MovieChat Forums > Arrival (2016) Discussion > Spoilers; This Movie Is Full of Plot Hol...

Spoilers; This Movie Is Full of Plot Holes


If Amy Adams can simply "remember" a phrase in Mandarin, and can "remember" a phone number that she has never seen before, then why couldn't the aliens "remember" how to write in English (or any human language) and simply write "we come in peace" from the very beginning?

It seems that aliens smart enough to travel through space without emitting waste and with the superpower of clairvoyance should be able to figure out a simple plan to use these powers to communicate with humans in a non-vague way like "use the weapon".

And if they can see the future why did the aliens not know there was a bomb on their spaceship and push Amy Adams and Jeremy Renner out of the spaceship earlier so they could have time to run for cover?

Also, why did they arrive in 12 different locations and make it a puzzle? Why couldn't they just arrive in one or two locations? And if they knew that the Chinese were super crazy and violent why not just land somewhere else?

When you consider that the aliens could see the future it makes all the conflict in the movie seem unnecessary. These are beings that plan thousands of years in advance but they can't come up with a more efficient plan for making contact with humanity?

reply

Alien One - "We're going to visit the humans tomorrow"
Alien Two - "But what's tomorrow if we're supposed to be non-linear time aliens?"
Alien One - "Shut up!"
Alien Two - "Ok how are we going to visit the humans then?"
Alien One - "We're going to take 12 ships and land there, say nothing and freak them out, and wait for them to figure out a way of talking to us"
Alien Two - "dude, that's a bit dramatic isn't it - it might really freak them out. Cant we write them a letter first or something?"
Alien One - "No, because I've already seen it's the way it works"
Alien Two - "Ok...but it seems a bit silly, i mean we can just tell them why we're there. Why are we going anyway?"
Alien One - "Because of the whole 3000 years thing... "
Alien Two - "But aren't we non-linear time aliens where time doesn't matter?"
Alien One - "yes - but it's determinism, you see?"
Alien Two - "But if it's determinism then doesn't what happens in 3000 years still stand? - it won't actually change"
Alien One - "Shut up you're confusing me! just watch the film"

reply

Best comment ever !!

reply

Lol yeah.

reply

[deleted]

Careful the people who loved the movie will launch a smear campaign against you and call you dumb just because you didn't like it. I agree with you.

reply

Haha , I liked it although they didn't expound on theory part at all, Do agree with lot , drama disguised as Sci-Fi but they had interesting idea.

reply

It's the nature of time and destiny though. You're assuming that the aliens can see the future and make changes to it. But in this movie, at least, it seems that changes CAN'T be made. That, in itself, raises all sorts of paradoxes (for instance, if destiny is set in stone, than how would knowing the future help or change anything?). One "theory" of time travel is that everything that will ever happen has already occurred and, again, can't be altered. That's what this movie seems to follow. The truth is that all time travel stories require a suspension of one's disbelief.

reply

That's a plot hole! She talked to the Chinese General in the future and knew exactly what she had to tell him now. If she wouldn't have seen the future then she would have been able to call him.

reply

It is not a plothole. You interpret it incorrectly since you think of time as being linear. That is exactly what is not the case here.

reply

Chinese General knew . she had to see his number what the hell was that about ?

reply

Wasnt that the same in interstellar. Murph see's the books fall of the shelves in her bedroom but to us the event that causes this hadn't happened yet until McConaughey's character had gone into space and made the books move.

reply

I agree with you here. Every event is tied together and essentially gridlocked into happening. The failures have to occur along with the successes. Amy's character couldn't decide when she saw a flashback/flash forward or what that information would give her. She just had to live it to learn that it even happened or mattered.

reply

Maybe they can't make changes because they are on our planet and have to do things within the confines of Earth's limitations?

reply

The movie gave an explanation for this, whether it sounds plausible or not is a different matter.

But, in the movie it's said that human being had to work in order to understand the alien language, in particular to work together. That is why there were 12 different locations spread around, because the countries needed to overcome their mistrust and share information in order to usher in this new, cooperative era in human history.

If they had just come down and said, 'we come in peace', according to the logic of the movie this would not have been effective in getting people to work together.

Also, there would have been no movie.

Why Abbot had to die, I don't know.

reply

So just because a few people in the military worked together in one instance that means that all of humanity entered a new era of cooperation? That makes no sense, it's almost like the way a child would think.

Countries cooperate together all the time, I mean we have the United Nations. The United States and the USSR worked together to bring down Nazi Germany, but that didn't mean that from then on the US and Russia would have amazing diplomatic relations.

reply

Exactly, it's a very stupid and nonsensical movie that's masquerading as something intellectually searching.

reply

"So just because a few people in the military worked together in one instance that means that all of humanity entered a new era of cooperation? That makes no sense, it's almost like the way a child would think."

Or the way a liberal writer would think.

reply

by bugsyboo;

"The movie gave an explanation for this, whether it sounds plausible or not is a different matter.

But, in the movie it's said that human being had to work in order to understand the alien language, in particular to work together. That is why there were 12 different locations spread around, because the countries needed to overcome their mistrust and share information in order to usher in this new, cooperative era in human history.

If they had just come down and said, 'we come in peace', according to the logic of the movie this would not have been effective in getting people to work together."

It's more subtle than that especially considering the ideas from the short story.
- The cooperation in the film is not going to necessarily create a new era in world history.
- What the intervention of the space aliens did was to change the timeline in such a way that humanity will be able to help the space aliens in 3000 years.
That's it.

The space aliens know the future timeline and the effects of their actions. They act in a specific way to get a specific effect which will result in a certain event in the future.

The OP wrote;

aliens smart enough to travel through space without emitting waste and with the superpower of clairvoyance should be able to figure out a simple plan to use these powers to communicate with humans in a non-vague way like "use the weapon".

The aliens act in the way they do to get a specific effect on the timeline.
Of course the space aliens could more directly communicate with Dr. Banks.
But the aliens went through the motions in a certain way to have a specific effect.

- There are movies which go through the idea of a timeline where a simple change has massive effects.
One very famous one is "It's a Wonderful life". That movie shows the timeline with George Bailey and without George Bailey.
A simple change of one life can have a profound change on what happens throughout an entire town.
- In "Arrival" the space aliens act in a particular way around the earth to get the exact result that they want which will in the future lead to an event in 3,000 years which they desire.

Imo at least, BB ;-)

it is just in my opinion - imo - 🌈

reply

I am afraid your plotholes have too many .... plotholes

"If Amy Adams can simply "remember" a phrase in Mandarin, and can "remember" a phone number that she has never seen before, then why couldn't the aliens "remember" how to write in English (or any human language) and simply write "we come in peace" from the very beginning? "

You make the assumption here that because the Aliens does not speak English , they cannot speak English. Highly unlikely. The reason why they dont speak English is clear, because they dont have to and they gain nothing from it. Their prime mission is to teach humans their language, so they can see forward in time and help them advanced technology wise.

Its also possible that they have foreseen that humans would act violently out of mistrust and that may led to the conclusion that would be safer to let humans blow some steam , cause obviously they cannot harm the aliens, and this could lead to building a more deep trust between eftapod and humans.

Think of it as the alien version of "turn the other cheek" .

I think this answer all your plothole very easily, why they did not destroy the bomb, why they did not act more rapidly , why they were so vague and why they arrived in 12 different places.

Actually you can see that clearly because when they bomb wents off they dont leave or even retaliate, so its clear they expected that but they just levitate in higher altitude. Its clear that they wented the bomb to blow but they did not want other bombs , possibly because they wanted to make sure that their statement was

"We are your friends, but dont waste our very valuable 3000 years time"

In order to make someone trust you have to know when to turn the other cheek and where to draw the line ;)

reply

Wait. They could have used English to teach humans their language the way other people teach language. Duh.

Those aliens were dumb but they had soohisticated space crafts. How did they make those space crafts with no opposible thumbs? Or were there humans on their planet that made those space crafts for them?

reply

Unfortunately when I saw it last night I was asking all of the same questions because quite simply, the movie did not make sense.
In her opening monologue she is seen with her daughter speaking about how rough things are in the present state. To begin, this is the first time the movie tries to trick you into believing the daughter has already died. Second, in talking about how ugly this is, why would you choose to have this kid with the scientist when you know the genetics will lead to a rare condition resulting in death? I would not wish that on any child.
My girlfriend saw the movie with me and tried to make sense of it, saying that altering the future could have a domino effect that could lead her to not have talked to the Chinese diplomat. There's a problem with this theory as well, she already obtained the information and used it to calm the Chinese Military and time IS linear.
I was also extremely upset with the music selection. It was downright annoying at most parts of the movie, and I have read that the movie has been disqualified from the Oscars because so much of it was copied from other movies.
It seems very unlikely that she is the only person on earth, apparently, that can see the future but oh thankfully she is chosen to speak to the aliens and, oh, what a coinky-dink, the aliens no she can see the future too!!!
The relationship with the scientist was extremely forced. After solving a global issue, I generally feel like the "I know that I was supposed to meet you" line did not work for me regarding their relationship. Then all the forwarded cut scenes leading to "let's have a baby"... I don't buy it.
Again, if she knew her actions would leave the child fatherless why not tell the scientist WAY in advance what she had been seeing and not drop that bombshell on him. Hell, I'd be running from that crazy bitch too.
The scientists conclusions from when our main character had fallen asleep and he figured out the 3D structure involved time seemed really ridiculous and scientifically speaking, I can't make any legitimacy of it.
Why the hell was the bird there? The damn thing was so go damn annoying. Others told me that they thought the bird could talk to the alien but when was a single time you saw the alien address the bird? The damn thing went ape *beep* Talking of poor cinematography, it looked like they continued to use the same shot of the bird flying from one end of the cage to the other over and over!!! Seriously!?!?!
Finally, yes the idea of time travel is, as others are frequently mentioning, the key point the movie has emphasized... by accident. I don't have to reexplain how damn awful they messed up playing on linear time is, as many other redditors have clearly done so, but it was absolutely pathetic.
I left the movie shaking my head "No" at this film.

reply

Why the hell was the bird there? The damn thing was so go damn annoying. Others told me that they thought the bird could talk to the alien but when was a single time you saw the alien address the bird? The damn thing went ape *beep*


Why yes, of course, just like miners used to bring canaries into mines in order to engage in conversation with the rock.

reply

Why yes, of course, just like miners used to bring canaries into mines in order to engage in conversation with the rock.
ROFL!

reply

tadlockparker, first, you should use some paragraphs when you write big texts. It makes easier to read.

I agree with what you say. Yes, lucky for us, the only person on Earth who can communicate with them, was chosen to go there. No one else from 7 billion people could do it, only her. Why, what was so special about her?

Second, this was supposed to be an incident of global effect, that would affect every human. So what the f-word was so significant about her and her daughter? All these type of movies focus on ONE person, and it just doesn't make sense. Yes, of course movies can't have like 50 protagonists, but in really good written movies like "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", although you see only one man's story, the movie ends without having the feeling that the aliens came ONLY for him or he was the ONLY one who could understand them and "save the world". It wasn't only him who left at the end with the spaceship, they were others too. Plus of course, they came back to return the ones they had taken. It was't like Dreyfuss was the focus point of their visit.

But in "Arrival", it's like all these aliens came to Earth only to make contact with her, and let her know that her daughter will die from cancer. And she gives birth to her anyway! Yeah, ok, she will have about 10 good years, but she will die suffering. So what?

I won't reply to anything else you say, because I don't know what to say. You left the theatre shaking "no" at the movie, I left and I hadn't understood why this movie was made, and why did I watch it.

As for the bird, me too I was confused, but I think they say in the movie that they brought it with them to see if it would die, so to know if the spacechip was contaminated or whatever.

reply


Second, this was supposed to be an incident of global effect, that would affect every human. So what the f-word was so significant about her and her daughter? All these type of movies focus on ONE person, and it just doesn't make sense. Yes, of course movies can't have like 50 protagonists, but in really good written movies like "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", although you see only one man's story, the movie ends without having the feeling that the aliens came ONLY for him or he was the ONLY one who could understand them and "save the world". It wasn't only him who left at the end with the spaceship, they were others too. Plus of course, they came back to return the ones they had taken. It was't like Dreyfuss was the focus point of their visit.


I can answer that question. The answer is screenwriting 101: pick a hero and give the hero outward motivation that we can see/hear and then give the hero challenges that make a conflict for the hero to overcome.

reply

by tadlockparker;

"why would you choose to have this kid with the scientist when you know the genetics will lead to a rare condition resulting in death? I would not wish that on any child.
My girlfriend saw the movie with me and tried to make sense of it, saying that altering the future could have a domino effect..."

Imo your girlfriend is on the right track.
For the space aliens the timeline needs to happen in a certain way so that in 3000 years humanity can help the aliens.
Dr. Banks understands that. Even though her daughter will die of cancer, she accepts her fate and focuses on the positive times she will have with her daughter. And then her actions follow the timeline as she has seen it.

"could lead her to not have talked to the Chinese diplomat. There's a problem with this theory as well, she already obtained the information and used it to calm the Chinese Military and time IS linear."

I don't see a problem.
Dr. Banks had the information from her actions in the future.
She used that in the past to affect the timeline.
But Dr. Banks still needed to play out those events at the party with the Chinese General otherwise there would be a paradox which would be this; a future event is seen but the future event does not happen.
- Anything seen by Dr. Banks from the future must happen to keep the timeline the way it needs to be.

"It seems very unlikely that she is the only person on earth, apparently, that can see the future"

The movie indicates she is the only person who has that skill.
This is not only a standard movie idea especially in hero films but it is also true in our world.
Sometimes only one scientist at the time can figure out a scientific problem whether it was Newton or Einstein.

"... but oh thankfully she is chosen to speak to the aliens"

Of course she is. The movie shows that she is the top language expert in the US.

"... and, oh, what a coinky-dink, the aliens no she can see the future too!!!"

Yes the space aliens know that she is the one who has the skills to see into the future.
The space aliens also can see into the future. They know they will meet Dr. Banks before it happens.

"Again, if she knew her actions would leave the child fatherless why not tell the scientist WAY in advance what she had been seeing and not drop that bombshell on him."

Because Dr. Banks knows that the timeline has to be preserved as she saw it for the reasons I've explained.
- It was very uncomfortable for me to see the future tragedy of her marriage and her daughter's death.
But I also also understood why she would follow the timeline.

"...our main character had fallen asleep and he figured out the 3D structure involved time seemed really ridiculous and scientifically speaking, I can't make any legitimacy of it."

Agreed. There is no scientific reason for Dr. Banks to be able to see into the future.
It's a premise of the story which seems like a superpower.
- There are other drama films that have time travel which handle the power this way, like a superpower;
Including; "Somewhere In Time" and "The Time Traveler's Wife".

"Why the hell was the bird there?"

In the past canaries were used in mines to test whether the air was safe.
If the canary died, then the workers knew there was a danger and would get out of the mine.
- tap the bird was in the movie was simply to test whether the air was safe to breathe.

Imo at least, BB ;-)

it is just in my opinion - imo - 🌈

reply

BB-15, I haven't yet responded to your interesting comments on my comment from a week ago, but will soon!

Meanwhile, some additional thoughts about this exchange:

"It seems very unlikely that she is the only person on earth, apparently, that can see the future"

The movie indicates she is the only person who has that skill.
This is not only a standard movie idea especially in hero films but it is also true in our world.
Sometimes only one scientist at the time can figure out a scientific problem whether it was Newton or Einstein.

"... but oh thankfully she is chosen to speak to the aliens"

Of course she is. The movie shows that she is the top language expert in the US.


I just wanted to add that I think the aliens come to earth at the exact moment in history where they know they will make contact with a linguist who will be able to learn their language and utilize it to its full extent. By full extent
I mean learn how to travel mentally through time once the language has rewired her brain enough to do so.

Also, her brain is already unique by virtue of being the best linguist in the world, and the ability to access time differently is an extension of her language ability - not of anything supernatural. So it's not like she coincidentally has two rare skills (linguistic genius AND ability to see the future) because in this movie they're two aspects of the same talent.

reply

by bugsyboo;

"I just wanted to add that I think the aliens come to earth at the exact moment in history where they know they will make contact with a linguist who will be able to learn their language and utilize it to its full extent."

You've done a nice job to emphasize how much the aliens were aware of their role in the situation with humanity and Dr. Banks.
* This point deserves your added attention.
- The aliens had the vision of the future before they came to earth.
- Before arriving the aliens knew English, they knew the future reactions of humanity, they knew they would meet Dr. Banks and that she would learn the future vision skill.
- The job for the aliens was to do their part to make the events happen.
- Of course humanity does not know the future. They were panicked and stressed by the situation.
- And at first Dr. Banks does not yet have the future vision ability. She has to learn the alien's language and their skill.

"her brain is already unique by virtue of being the best linguist in the world, and the ability to access time differently is an extension of her language ability - not of anything supernatural. So it's not like she coincidentally has two rare skills (linguistic genius AND ability to see the future) because in this movie they're two aspects of the same talent."

Agreed. In the film she is one of those exceptional people in history who is able to do something better than anyone else, like an Einstein or a Newton.
- She has the ability to learn the alien language at such a depth that she acquires the future vision skill.

Imo at least, BB ;-)

it is just in my opinion - imo - 🌈

reply

BB-15, oh no they are closing the boards, what a horrible terrible decision!

I liked this discussion and had intended to write more, where will people like you and Garchomp going to be posting in the future?? I hope they reverse this heartless move.

reply

Yes, the movie blatantly tries to trick you by inserting a future vision into a scene in which she has not developed the power to see into the future yet. They do this so that people cannot figure out the eventual, rather weak plot twist.

As for the daughter having cancer thing, this is actually one plot point that I do not have a problem with, because it seems to be one of the main themes of the movie. She chooses to still have the kid because the visions she has had make her love her future daughter already. She would rather spend 10 years that she will cherish forever than never have that daughter. It is not out of any determinism, I-cannot-alter-the-timeline thing. It is simply because she wants those few precious years with her daughter. It's supposed to come off as sweet and beautiful, it comes across as kind of crazy to me.

Anyway, most of y'alls explanations honestly do not convince me. Yes it is plausible I suppose that most of the things CAN happen if the aliens choose to act very stupidly, but it's not believable to me.

I think the reason is that this movie is an ALLEGORY. It is not meant to be a hard sci-fi portrayal of a visitation from aliens. It is first and foremost a drama. I have heard the concept that your language affects the way you perceive things. For example, an aboriginal tribe is rumored to have no concept of the word evil in their language, so they have absolutely no crime. Is this actually possible? Probably not. But the movie uses this idea that language can deeply affect the way we view the world.

It should also be noted that movies that rely to heavily on a plot twist often are constructed in a very precise and delicate way. Movies like The Village and The Sixth Sense often do not make that much sense when you really think about them. The reason is that the writer has to construct the movie in a very specific way so that the twist is impactful but at the same time unpredictable. An example would be in The Village, everyone speaks in "old timey" English despite not really having any reason to do so.

reply

by Garchomp;

"Anyway, most of y'alls explanations honestly do not convince me."

Which is fine.
And at the same time, your arguments have not convinced me.
This is not meant as a criticism.
People can have very different reactions to the same film.

"she wants those few precious years with her daughter. It's supposed to come off as sweet and beautiful, it comes across as kind of crazy to me."

If you believe something is crazy. If you think that no one in a science fiction story could do what she did, then fine.
I think that someone in a SF story could do what she does (and I can think of some examples) but it doesn't matter.
- You think it's crazy and I can't argue with your gut feelings about that.

Which again is fine.
And that leads to my just agreeing to disagree.

Imo at least, BB ;-)

it is just in my opinion - imo - 🌈

reply

Garchomp, I agree with you that she decides to have her daughter because she already knows her and loves her and not because she has no free will. I know my comment is coming months later and doesn't contribute anything to the discussion, but on this point we do agree.

reply

If Amy Adams can simply "remember" a phrase in Mandarin, and can "remember" a phone number that she has never seen before, then why couldn't the aliens "remember" how to write in English (or any human language) and simply write "we come in peace" from the very beginning?

The difference being we see Louise being given her information.

Whereas it would seem the heptapods never learned our language well enough to communicate in the manner you suggest. As Louise speaks directly with them on the other side of the glass, it's still pretty rudimentary.

They simply did not become adept enough, but then they didn't need to.

It seems that aliens smart enough to travel through space without emitting waste and with the superpower of clairvoyance should be able to figure out a simple plan to use these powers to communicate with humans in a non-vague way like "use the weapon".

That's not what they said -- that's what we think they said.

Like Louise receiving the information from the General, it's probably likely the heptapods deduced where they must be and what they must do based on the outcome. The details only become clear once more focus gets paid toward that particular moment in time.


And if they can see the future why did the aliens not know there was a bomb on their spaceship and push Amy Adams and Jeremy Renner out of the spaceship earlier so they could have time to run for cover?

It had to happen. Instead of running for cover, Louise was drawn in by Abbott's actions. All the while she's being shown how the heptapods do not act with malice or even vengeance. They act for the greater good, which includes maintaining human survival for at least another 3000 years.

Also, why did they arrive in 12 different locations and make it a puzzle? Why couldn't they just arrive in one or two locations? And if they knew that the Chinese were super crazy and violent why not just land somewhere else?

The theme is about breaking through miscommunication, which is represented by many different nations. The number 12 probably has more to do with the points on a clock than actual location.

When you consider that the aliens could see the future it makes all the conflict in the movie seem unnecessary. These are beings that plan thousands of years in advance but they can't come up with a more efficient plan for making contact with humanity?

I know. There's that line from THE MATRIX where Morpheus gets super obvious saying something like "Whatever happened happened and couldn't happen any other way." Maybe I'm making that up but it seems like something the Wachowskis would say. Time travel stories are often about choices, and in real life how we make "bad" choices that we either regret or move on from. Yes we wish things went better, and we ask ourselves couldn't it have gone differently?

But the deeper question is what part of you wants such a thing, to relive a moment, and why? It wouldn't make much of a difference because the experience won't be erased. You'll always remember it. It was the very thing that made you want to go back and change it. When we get to the part of ourselves that wants to transform our history, we will also need to ask, "Was what happened all that bad?" Maybe it was melodramatic, occasionally violent, and certainly very tense -- hell, all this made for a great movie for me.











REMEMBER: Sofia Vergara =/= Vera Farmiga

reply

it is stupid and boring movie

reply