Who did more damage JJ or Rian?


In your opinion between these 2 which do you think hurt the lore, story, characters and themes of Star Wars more (especially now with the trilogy being complete)?

I think I might be in the minority that thinks that JJ did more damage. It was he that undermined the characters of Leia and especially Han; turned Luke into an absent leader and never had a reason planned for it, turned the force into marvel like super powers, set up a completely implausible setting with the First Order and did not one bit of world building to make it feel in place, did another death star, and now with TROS finished off the trilogy by completely undermining the legacy of STar Wars by bringing back the emperor and making Rey related to him (effectively ruining the entire point of the OT and changed it from a Skywalker Story to a Palpatine story).

Rian did quite of bit of damage and made some of this wounds much worse so it would be interesting to discuss which was the worse between the 2.

reply

The fans

reply

While the fans and their reactions were a contributing factor to the writers and producers decisions; the fans did not write and shot these films. That was JJ and Rian that did that. So of them which did more harm?

reply

Neither, blame the boss Kennedy

reply

I think there are two ways of seeing the sequels:

- They're a continuation of the Star Wars narrative as established by George Lucas.

- They're simulations of a theme owned by Disney, in this case the "Star Wars themed simulation" of the work of Lucas.

It's easier to understand what has been produced if you look at the films through the prism of the second perspective, and the motivations behind their productions.

The directors of the sequels were charged with the task of creating films that reflected the Disney ethos which I interpret as being the following:

- A story that reflects positive messages and is presented in a light entertainment format, and features youthful characters as leads or as being central to the narrative.

- Cute sidekick characters that support the main characters in their adventures.

- Lively engagement with theme material to create a "world" or environment which the viewer recognises from the broader world. Examples: westerns, pirates, supernatural, spies, animals, particular franchises or well-known fictional characters or stories from classic literature or modern day pop culture, etc.

- Achieve Popularity and excellent box office results/ratings, with the movie serving as marketing material for Disney merchandise and related live entertainment facilities like Disney World, etc.

Both Abrams and Rian had to meet these objectives to some degree to please Disney executives. In addition to that activity was the professional and personal wish to put their individual creative stamp on the films. Equally, the direction of the films involved interpretation based on assumptions and beliefs about fantasy and scifi. But does the interpretation faithfully reflect what makes Star Wars great?

Abrams appears to have had the most influence throughout the trilogy, directing two films and executive producing one. With his brief to work on films that reflected the "Disney vision", he seems to have attempted to duplicate the original Star Wars as a

reply

Since Lucas's story treatments were tossed, I think the 2nd view is the only one that is valid.

Your breakdown of what went into the motivation behind the decisions is fairly likely and we see the results. You can't corporate produce art and STar Wars was art.

Abrams definitely now has the edge on influence now; but as of the release of TLJ it was 100% equal. Abrams in TFA only cared about doing his 'love letter' to ANH and fill it with his brand of fast paced mindless action, visual imagery mimicking, and riddled with empty mystery boxes. When tasked with actually filling those mystery boxes he first told Rian to do whatever he wanted and then when he had to fix it himself you see what he did with TROS.

reply

(cont.):

tribute to the original trilogy to make it exciting and absorbing in a manner which he feels was effective. In the first film he dutifully presents new characters as the youthful heroes and villains who seem to owe their experiences to the heritage of older characters that were once young themselves and from a time rather long ago. The presence of the new characters promote courage and social diversity but the message is symbolically delivered more than literally conveyed in speeches or dialogue, so the audience are made aware of the themes on some level (in this way the socially positive messages are marketed to reflect the values of Disney and perhaps as a response to the perceived values of the audience being targeted).

Here Abrams vision of Star Wars is of a frenetic battle where the characters are kept on their toes as they move from one challenge to another. They are people under pressure and there is no time really to talk or relax. One might ask where is the Force in all of this, where is the "spiritual" feel or tone? It's there somewhere but what's more important is the action sequences which are often impressive. It is hard to see how the characters are really established in this film, we just know what they are meant to represent - inheritors of tasks from characters who are their archetypal matches, ie. Luke, Leia, and Han. The appearances of these classic Star Wars characters is a little lacklustre - they seem tired and really have limited roles to play in the story - they are there as theme brand recognition and fan service.

The first film has its good points but it obviously is seeking acceptance from the audience as being genuine, true and authentic without necessarily being creatively engaging - there is too much borrowing from specific aspects of the original films. He wanted to "freshen" the old by adding new droids and new humans but with the benefit of a template that reinterprets scenes with great similarity from the old

reply

(cont.):

movies - copying the old creates a feeling in the audience that somehow the old is diminished and the new is somewhat cheap. I think this overrides any idea about "honouring" the old or classic - it suggests that somehow it was impossible to create both a new story and one which reflected accurately and with heart the older films.

In the third film, there is more of the same, but it has been tempered somewhat. Characters are given room to breathe.

Rian Johnson as the director in the second film seemed more interested in character interactions and exploring emotional stakes. There is more conflict and a morose Luke Skywalker is actually probably just the kind of mentor Rey needs - he knows what lies behind events, the tragic and deadly history of Kylo Ren - and given the turn of events where the Dark Side threw him off his game as a faliable human being and a wise Jedi he can now help Rey negotiate the current turmoil in the galaxy (even Yoda makes an appearance and mentors Luke about the importance of letting go and being his own guide despite the burden of history).

I guess the question is: did this film convince you that Rey is a worthy inheritor and student of a Jedi path? Or that her friends are real heroes and relatable and virtuous people? Or are they annoying and poorly written or somewhere inbetween?

Once again it should be noted the film attempts to duplicate in some aspects scenes from the old films - the Yoda and Luke experience on an isolated planet, the imperial forces confronting the rebels on a white landscape or cold desert, etc.

So whilst Abrams and Johnson haven't ruined Star Wars more than each other they have contributed a mixed bag result of good and bad, their movies suffering from the maladies of "remakitis" and "rebootism". Part of this situation is the desire to exploit the more than willing fandom phenomenon which has received ample boosting from the comic book movie craze of recent years.

reply

How is it not Rian Johnson?

Has anyone seen "The Last Jedi"? What, exactly, is there left for the third film? There is no hook, or anything to build off at the end of that movie. Rian Johnson killed Snoke and replaced him with nothing, so that story line just ends. He gave Luke a character arc that a lot of people hated and then resolved it... and then killed him, so that story line is dead. Holdo blows up the 1st order fleet, with a made up maneuver that alters space battles for ever, and that ends. Captain Phasma is killed... again, and her story is done. You see where I'm going here?

I can't even imagine being tasked to write a third film after TLJ. JJ and Terrio must've been irate and pulling their hair out. "There is nothing left to do!!!!" "We're gonna just have to make up some crazy shit because Rian left us nothing."

Everyone always says: "Well at least he tired to do something different." Who the hell tries to do something different in the middle entry of a trilogy? It'd be like getting Michael Bay to direct "The Two Towers"... Imagine it, Frodo, Sam, and Gollum all make their way to Mordor with Bud Lights in their hands, The Nazgûl can cause explosions now, Eowyn is played by Megan Fox, Gandalf returns in a Camaro, ect. The damage would be too great for Peter Jackson to overcome, just like it was JJ.

TFA is a good introduction. Say what you will about it being a retread/reboot or whatever, but it doesn't do any major damage, and it leaves room for so many cool ideas that they could've done.

reply

Snoke had no set up; there was no backstory. He was a carbon copy of the Emperor but had no plausible explanation for even existing in the first place. If I got handed that mess to sort out I would just kill the character too and try to move on to something else. Snoke got replaced with nothing because he was a nothing charcter to begin with. He was a stand in for the emperor and when JJ got tasked to fix his existance he actually did make him a stand in the for the ACTUAL emperor. That is on JJ, not Rian.

What explanation would Rian provide for why Luke was absent for years while Snoke and his former apprentice/nephew inflicted unimaginable harm on the galaxy? There was never going to be a good answer to this.

Phasma should have been dead after TFA; and she was even more of an empty character than Boba Fett.

I can't imagine trying to write my way out of the empty, completely implausible set up that TFA was.

What was the biggest criticism TFA got almost unanimously? It was unoriginal and relied too much on nostalgia. So what is Rian supposed to do with the next film? more unoriginal and rely on nostalgia? The guy was boxed into a corner and said 'f' it I am taking this franchise down with me'. I blame TFA for being so implausible and open ended that Rian had the narrative ability to do whatever he wanted to fill in the gaps.

TFA was not an introduction it was a film not a preamble. and it was was not an into either , it was a reset to a pre- ANH universe. . "doesn't do any major damage"? seriously? Han a dead beat dad regresses back to being a smuggler? First Order and Snoke being the same as the emperor (thus undermining the victory of ANH)? Luke running away? Rey turning the force into a marvel like super power that one just has and doesn't have to 'learn". Seriously the damage was done by the time Rian go there. You can say that he just put it out of its misery.

reply

Why did Snoke need a set up? He's a mysterious new villain, and it's left open to decide who or what he is. Could he be Darth Plagueis? Set up in the prequel trilogy, able to cheat death, ect. Sounds pretty good to me. What's Rian's choice? I can't think of anything good, so I'll just kill him. I'll leave Kylo as the main villain even though he's already been beat twice. Great...... It's like those old grade school English assignments where one person starts the story and the next is supposed to continue it, except there is always one kid who eventually ruins it. Rian is that kid.

Any explanation for Luke would've been better than what Rian came up with.

They could've done something with Phasma, but both directors pretty much screwed her character over.

So instead of using nostalgia in a positive way, and it is possible, Rian instead decides to do what he wants, which results in killing half the the fan base and starting a civil war online. Brilliant.

TFA is an introduction, and since Kathleen Kennedy didn't bother to have her story group plan any of this trilogy out, you get this huge mess.

reply

Snoke needed a set up because we were NOT in a new universe and we know were the characters left off 30 years ago. Because he was introduced in such similarity to how the emperor was they needed to distinguish him right away and JJ did not bother to do that. So he just comes across as a discount Emperor. If I was handed such a character to flesh out after it should have already been done I would kill him off too, in spite.

Yes Kylo is a poor villain to leave as the big bad because of how many times he got beat, remind me which film was it that he had those defeats in? Oh yeah TFA.

No explanation was going to be good and not feel incredibly contrived. I can't come up with one, I doubt anyone could and still be true to character and the narrative.

Phasma was done deal after she lowered the shields with almost no resistance and then was humiliated by being tossed in the Garbage disposal. Again which film did that happen in?

JJ did not use nostalgia in a positive way, he used it as a crutch to hide his incoherent story and weak characters.

If TFA is just an introduction than it is a 2.5 hour long trailer without a film to go with it. Again all of this is failing of TFA and JJ, not TLJ and Rian.

reply

Then you have no imagination because it really wouldn't be that hard to flesh him out. And for a supposed writer himself, Johnson, it shouldn't have been hard either.

And instead of developing him into a better villain than JJ, he instead decided a "Twilight-esque" romance with Rey would be better...

Contrived is still better than making a generation of people that loved him sour on his character. Not to mention, having the actor who plays him giving out bad press because he doesn't agree with the decisions. But we loved his fake change of heart didn't we? What that? ... you say that I'll be blackballed in Hollywood by Disney if I don't change my tune? In that case... I love what Rian did! lol.

If that's the case than Rian is dumber than JJ for bringing her back. Just write her out.

Rian failed because he only wanted to subvert expectations, and do his own movie, not be part of a trilogy.

reply

dont either bother exchanging with arflexit , i think hes a prequel era fanboy and doesn't get the lore of star wars.

As you say , TFA is a fine introduction to jump start a new trilogy , its not like we new the origins of the Emperor in Empire did we.

reply

"prequel era fanboy"

I saw TPM when I was 18 in theaters. and I hated it. I hated ATOC even more. ROTS didn't bother me as much but I saw it as dumb action mostly. So no I am not a prequel fanboy. And I think if you take no issue with Rey doing a jedi mind trick without training, it is you that does not get the lore of Star Wars.

TFA did not introduce anything of substance though. Everything was just a stand in for the OT content but with weaker plot and characters.

"ts not like we new the origins of the Emperor in Empire did we."

We knew enough by the middle of the first movie. That the emperor somehow took over a former galactic republic and turned into an empire with the help of Darth Vader. Nothing else much was needed because we did not know the State of things prior to ANH (at least at the time) but that film gave us enough and then explored more later. The problem with TFA is we know exactly what the state of the galaxy was 30 years prior and so we needed to have the gap filled. TFA didn't bother, it just reset the state of the universe to pre-ANH all over again.

reply

My point is that Snoke was always a stand in for the emperor; so no matter what was done to flesh him out would have come across like retroactive engineering. Perhaps you are right and Rian could have made it work; but I doubt it. and all the fan theories I heard about Snoke (being Plaguis, etc) were all lame, IMO.

Agreed, TLJ was weak in of itself but I blame JJ for setting up the poor introductions that had no set plan to explore.

I don't know, Luke already being missing already was bad enough; a contrived explanation would have just been like proping up a corpse. Better to burn the corpse, at least I think. but as I said elsewhere; what JJ did to Han is at least as bad as what Rian did to Luke.

I don't think Rian had a choice about bringing Phasma back; that felt like a corporate decision and Rian had to figure out a way and reason to include her. I could be wrong about that though.

Rian didn't just Subvert expectations, he purposefully undermined them. I think TLJ is terrible and Rian is awful, so don't get me wrong. I just blame TFA and JJ for setting up the setting a poor introduction to the ST that allowed for this all to happen. It all played out almost exactly like I called it in 2015. Which is sad.

reply

JJ. He had a blank slate to work with in Disney 7 and what did we get? Resistance when it should've been the New Republic. First Order when it should be the remnants of the Empire. Deadbeat Han. No Luke. Idiot Poe. Mary Sue Rey. Token Finn. Useless Phasma. Emo Kylo. Nazi Hux. Souped up Death Star that doesn't move. And a beeping beach ball. With a blank slate to work with, this is the best he can come up with?

Granted Johnson disregarded everything JJ did, which caused Disney 9 to be a retcon show, but JJ did absolutely nothing to cement the legacy characters and he didn't have to bring back the Emperor to undermine Darth Vader's redemption. Basically, Disney 7 undermines all of the victory of the Rebels from Ep. 6. That's stupid.

reply

Exactly. The damage was done already and JJ had FAR more liberty to craft his characters and story. Rian had to get the broken pieces that JJ created and try to make a story out of it. Now Rian took those pieces and figuratively burned them to ash, but IMO opinion the one more at fault for that is JJ.

It is like you have a violent assault that leaves a victim in pain suffering and bleeding out. A really crappy paramedic comes along and decides to start amputating limbs to avoid gangrene. Who gets the more severe charge in this case?

reply

Rian, hands down ... until RoS. Now I have to say they are tied for being shit.

But damage? Actual damage to the canon? Then it is no question Rian. JJ's sins are mostly (not all) bad writing and directing. Stupid plot points etc. When it comes to damage, I say Rian 1st for ruining the main 3 characters and light speed raming. Lucas is 2nd for Midichlorians. JJ 3rd for Emperor is back for no reason. Im not saying JJ made better movies than Lucas (although TFA gives preqs a run) but I am saying that he did less damage.

My bias: I am a 4 & 5 fan with various levels of distaste for all that came after. Some barely tolerable. Some utterly shit.

reply

I gotta tell ya', 5 was pretty damn exciting in the theater back in the day - I was only 14, so the perfect target audience.

reply

I am a little later to the party; I came into star wars right around the first time they came out on VHS box set. I want to say that was the late 80's if I remember correctly. I was not around for the first 2 and was too young to see the 3rd in theater.

reply

I was 11 and walking home from school with a pal talking about AD&D when a friend of my family drove up off the street saying "Your dad sent me to take you to see Empire Strikes Back." I didn't think twice (a different time and I knew him well). I blew $1 on Asteroids in the lobby waiting for the start time. No sequel has ever been as anticipated by me in my entire life. It sure delivered. Cemented my already feverish fandom.

A treasured movie memory. One of several from that era that are crystal in my mind.

reply

I don't know, JJ ruined Han at least as much as Rian ruined Luke; IMO. With Luke being ruined I also put that on JJ for having the "Luke has vanished" plot in the first place. He was ruined the moment he went missing without a planned reason for it. They needed to have a 100% acceptable reason for why Luke would run away, and they didn't. That is 100% on JJ not Rian. Rian had to try to figure out the reason Luke would run away and he should not have had to figure that out in the first place.

Really, you take more issue with Midichlorians than JJ bringing back the emperor thus effectively undoing Vader's entire redemption and the OT's entire plot. Come on man, you have got to be blinded by your hate of the PT to see it that way. Midichlorians were annoying because they were trying to quantify force potential (like an IQ test). That does not undermine the mysticism of the force. What undermines the mysticism is turning it into a 'marvel' like super power and having an untrained person just pull mind trick out of their ass and out force a trained user. Rey hurt the series far more than Midichlorians did.

reply

Undermining the mysticism of the Force is exactly what I think it did. It did to the OT what Highlander 2 did to Highlander.

Although I am less pissed at what JJ did to Han than what Rian did to Luke, I have to give your assessment credit. JJ's setup created a problem. At the time, I was more irritated by the "space map" instead of "why is Luke hiding?" I assumed there must be a cool reason. I liked the way TFA ended. Made me hope the next one would rock. I have learned a lesson.

reply

I suppose there was some hope that TLJ could have done something interesting, but the problem I called out was that no matter what Rian did it was going to feel like retroactive patch work. I said there was no way to both be a patch job film and tell its own story at the same time. and I was right.

Yeah, if Luke was hiding why the f would there be a map to him? That stupid mcguffin device was another weakness of the TFA plot. What is even worse is Rey is such a Mary Sue she even usurps the role of the mcguffin by about halfway through the film.

reply

Additionally, why a map? Why not just a specific coordinate? The map between two points in the vast vacuum of space is a straight line. Who needs this zig zag bullshit? Also, whoever made that map knew where the viewers of the map would be? Nearly as idiotic as the Sith dagger in TRoS.

I like Rey. I know she is a MS and, yes, that bothers me. Never the less, I like the scavenger who journeys into adventure. I also like the reformed Stormtrooper idea. TFA had promise IMO. I liked it more than the prequels in spite of its many flaws. They ruined Rey and Finn. Even beyond the whole MS indictment (a well deserved indictment), they ruined Rey. I also liked Kylo when he wasn't schitzo-whiney-spaz. My interest in these characters was erased with TLJ and not restored in TRoS.

reply

yeah the map to luke was a very poorly contrived mcguffin; there is no explanation of how it can even work, it doesn't even explain if he left the map or if it was a map that he used and then wanted destroyed. TLJ suggests the latter. but it doesn't matter because it was so poorly set up in the first place.

Rey and Finn had a lot of potential. The idea of a scavenger (with FOrce potential) and ex-stormtrooper redeeming himself are great ideas. But they were both utterly wasted and ruined by the end of TFA leaving nowhere to go with them except more of the same in the next 2 movies.

reply

Both in equally stupid but different ways...and some of the same ways.

Also, why isn't Kennedy in there? That bitch deserves plenty of blame herself.

reply

While I agree with you that Kennedy is arguably the person most at fault for managing the IP so incredibly disastrously. I wanted to narrow it down to the actual writers/directors that people blamed more. The way I see it is she had these boxes she wanted checked but it was on the writers/directors to get those items she wanted in but still in a story satisfying way; which they both failed out, and in my opinion JJ was the worse of the 2.

Now that is based on my assumption that Kennedy had little to do with the actual story portion of each film. From appearances she did not seem to care what the story did so long as her agenda was fulfilled. But I might be wrong, she might have ben the one to put crazy criteria in there such as Rey being super overpowered, never losing any fight or battle, never facing any real consequences, and not taking any help or training from a male character. If I was being cynical I would assume all that came from her. But actually I think that Rey is JJ's wish fulfillment character that just happens to be female because Kennedy wanted a female lead.

reply

JJ definitely did. With Johnson yeah he turned Luke into an infantile, pathetic loser but JJ brought back the Emperor which meant everything Luke did in the OT now means absolutely nothing.

reply

Yeah if people did not feel that JJ was the bigger offender after TFA they definitely should after TROS. Bringing back the emperor completely undermines the entirety of the OT and renders it pointless. If people actually love the OT there is no justification that is acceptable to not be outraged by this.

reply

JJ Abrams. I was underwhelmed by TFA and there weren’t many interesting places for the story to go. I didn’t care about Snoke to begin with so I wasn’t too bothered that Johnson killed him. Otherwise, Johnson just spun his wheels for an entire movie. Then Abrams was brought back to do more damage.

reply

Yes, that is how I felt too. Snoke was just a stand in for the emperor and was a cardboard cut out. It was a stupid character to begin with. Then since Rian was 'bold' enough to just kill him off unceremoniously, it forced JJ to remove the cardboard cut out and just present the 'real' emperor; which is what he was doing in all but name in the first place. This all a failing on JJ's part for not having an actual plan for Snoke and just making a carbon copy Emperor.

reply

Yeah, Snoke was Palpatine, Kylo was Vader, Dux was Tarkin, and the First Order was the Empire.

Captain Phasma and the Knights of Ren were the only interesting villain concepts but nothing was done with them.

reply

Captain Phasma was more like a stand in for Boba Fett; The only concept that had potential was the Knights of Ren and the idea that Kylo lead some kind of elite force. But like you said nothing was done with it.

reply

I liked the idea of a Stormtrooper as a main baddie. They didn't do anything with her, certainly, but I like the concept.

reply

Hmm, yeah if they had done something with her and fleshed her out a bit more than yeah; the idea of a big baddie inversion of Finn would have played out nicely had Finn not been such a joke and Phasma so utterly pointless (well except lowering the shields without much resistance inexplicably.)

OH man, every time I think about nearly every frame, every scene and every character of TFA I cringe. It was so incredibly bad. How can anyone justify liking it? Once again I say it, all spectacle and no substance.

reply

I think it's turning into a new Phantom Menace. When Phantom Menace came out, a lot of fans were super excited and defended it against the "naysayers". I admit, I was a young'n when TPM came out and I was a defender for a while until, gradually, I admitted it was terrible. It wasn't overnight. I slowly began to say "Well, it's not perfect but Darth Maul was badass" and eventually had to own up to it, especially in light of the two follow-up movies. Force Awakens seems to be going down that path.

reply

I do seem to remember that at first most liked TPM. But the very vocal "George Lucas raped my childhood" minority got everyone on the hate bandwagon. I did not like TPM right away. The flaws of it are numerous and the execution is poor (not to mention way too polished looking and dry/boring in a majority of the film). I was not on the hate bandwagon and tried to appreciate what they got right but I would never view it above say a 4 or 5 out of 10. But now in comparison to the ST they look a lot better.

I think more people are 'waking up' to what the Force Awakens was (no pun intended) but there still seem to be some bitter clingers (mostly from the above stated "george lucas raped my childhood" crowd that refuse to acknowledge the prequels were not nearly as bad as the sequels and that their hate is what lead directly to this.

reply