Untalented, HIDEOUS LOOKING, just godawful in every way. Is this how it was back in the day? I don't know, if I saw Star Wars for the first time back in 1977 I wouldn't ask the same about Mark Hamill, he was cute looking, he is obviously a natural for the camera. Now I seem to ask this question for EVERY SINGLE FILM RELEASED TODAY. Who thought these people could step in front of a camera? So fucked up. It's the Dustin Hoffman effect I guess.
shareDaisy Riley is just an actress, she has not written the awful script and we don't know whether she agrees with it. The same way Hamill is not to blame for what they have done to Luke.
sharemy point is, the people in charge are terrible, hence why they cast someone who is terrible.,
shareAnd my point is that you can't really say that one actor is bad with such an awful script. At much, you can say that they are not great actors, because such ones would make even a terrible script look fine (and indeed Hamill has proved how an amazing actor he has become). But young actors are rarely that good.
sharelol young actors are rarely that good?? go watch a young Elizabeth Taylor. That's the fucking problem, everyone is acting like film was invented in 2013. Sorry these new actors are HORRIFIC. And Hamill unfortunately was terrible too.
sharelol young actors are rarely that good?? go watch a young Elizabeth Taylor
So, let me understand your reasoning here: I said that young actors are rarely that good, and to prove my statement wrong you point out to an actress born in... 1932.
Yikes, you don't know Elizabeth Taylor was a child actress?? Poor you, seriously.
shareI repete since you it seems you didn't get it: to prove wrong my statement that young actors are RARELY that good you point out an actress born in 1932.
shareAgain, film did not begin in 2015. Since the beginning there have been unbelievable young actors. You are just making excuses for mediocrity. A lot of the greatest film actors began when very young and they were incredible. But to know that, one would have to know about films produced before 2001, which I'm not sure you have seen any.
sharedamn, this dispute is a convoluted mess.
shareThere's nothing remotely special about her and think her acting is somewhat flat but she has enough of a generically attractive enough face in a poor woman's Kiera Knightly sort of way to get the hapless nerds fawning over her which is almost guaranteed for whoever the female lead is in Star Wars films
sharethat's the thing, she is not attractive at all.
shareYet another posh English girl with little acting talent, who also seems to be a bit of a bimbo by believing the term Mary Sue is sexist.
shareI have nothing against her but there's something about her head shape that irks me, it looks like a box or something. I can't put my finger on it.
shareshes not too bad, alot better than hayden christian , i cant stand him in the prequels , sounds like a dumb ass
shareI find it difficult to feel strongly about Daisy Ridley either way...
share