Cringeworth cgi
Ive seen some bad cgi over the years, but this has got to be the worst cgi since the 90s. Even the cgi in the spawn movie was better
what was wrong with it?
Its the best blending of CGI, green screen and perspective manipulation (large god/small humans) i have seen in a while, much better than Peter Jackson's LOTR
the studio feel is often masked by the panaroma in the green screen
http://myimpressionz.tk
Come on, where did you put your eyes? As long as it was full CGI, it was fine, but as for the green screen keying, most of them were horrendous. Especially the close-ups on character heads before green screen? I couldn't believe those are release-quality shots.
You can't even compare with LOTR and that's like fifteen years back.
I agree, though in the trailer looked quite rubbish, the movie was actually very good at blending actors with cgi generated "everything else". Anyone with a doubt, go see this movie, then watch Riddick (2013) to apreciate the appaling difference with only 3 years in-between.
shareHave you played any of the Uncharted games or The Last of Us? Naughty Dog made better water effects than Gods of Egypt did..
sharemuch better than Peter Jackson's LOTR
This is just hilarious. Even at 15 or so years old, LOTR still represents the best that the industry has to offer. I have yet to see a film that truly blends live action and visual effects so seamlessly and realistically as that trilogy managed to do. Now, The Hobbit is another story...was not so impressed with that. But LOTR? Still way at the very top. Gods of Egypt doesn't even come close. Few things do.
As for Gods of Egypt, it's not even a contender for quality effects. Yes, there was some beautiful cinematography but "good effects" =/= "lots of effects." They could have taken a more subtle approach and gotten beautiful results but they went all out and then some, and the result was way too over the top and downright cartoonish much of the time.
Hell, Dragonheart was made in 1996 and I still haven't seen many films that managed to bring a non-human character to life that well. Gods of Egypt had far too many annoying tropes, overdone dialogue and performance and went hardcore style over substance. share
You have to be kidding me, Gandalf at Bag End was laughable....Their eyes dont even meet, Gandalf was looking straight over bilbo most of the time.
http://myimpressionz.tk
The matte paintings were pretty obvious
-----------
It's like selling a million grills at the same time! With extended warranty!
Couldn't disagree more.
shareSo then, what your saying is that you couldn't discern the matte paintings.
It's not somethhing you can disagree on, you either see it or you don't. The fact that I can discern them means that they are obvious (I don't think I have a trained eye or anything like that).
They weren't as obvious as the ones in Batman 89, but still.
-----------
It's like selling a million grills at the same time! With extended warranty!
cgi was ok. i think camera work was bad. the same moving camera shots seemed just too repetitive and draw the eye out of the scene and of story
shareIts the best blending of CGI, green screen and perspective manipulation (large god/small humans) i have seen in a while, much better than Peter Jackson's LOTR
One of the most ridiculous posts I've seen in quite awhile. Many video games look better than this. share
Distracting CGI was part of the charm.
This movie was supposed to be campy and fun.
Is that the argument people are using now to try to defend how @#$% the movie is?
sharebecause it s a darn fun movie, full of heart
http://my-impressionz.cu.cc
You must have been born in the 90's.
share