Did they hint that Q is gay?
Not that there’s anything wrong with that...
shareYes they did
shareYep, see how important it is to include this in a Bond movie?
Do these movie studios do this for money? probably
the gay mafia is behind this. just like they bullied that hot porno star into offing herself just for not wanting to work with homo dicks. RIP August Ames. the gay mafia will pay!! once the libturds import more of the middle east into this country we will have sharia law and they know how to deal with the gay mafia
shareDude settle down! I think you forgot your meds.
shareI thought it was slightly more than just a hint.
shareI don't why these insignificant supporting characters have become so important in the Craig era. They don't add anything to the films. We shouldn't know or care what Q's sexuality is. Q has been in nearly every Bond film, and his sexuality or private life was never relevant. He shows up for 1-2 scenes of comedic relief and that's it. That's the way it should be.
shareIt's put in the movie to appeal to a certain audience. That one movie reviewer on YouTube explains is all when she says how exciting it is to have Q as a LBGT character and she just wishes they would have went further by showing his boyfriend.
This is how brainwashed half the population is in thinking stupid shit like this is interesting/important/exciting.
I haven't seen the movie but I'm surprised it wasn't the same gay screenwriter who interjected ambiguous "gay hints" in Skyfall. I guess it was another screenwriter this time who couldn't resist interjecting their lifestyle preferences onto the Bond franchise. I'm assuming behind the scenes that someone was told "NO" to any more ambiguous "gay" Bond hints so had to settle for a minor recurring character to leave their gay stamp on.
shareYes and it felt shoehorned in.
shareYes it is wrong with that. Plenty.
share