Why not Siskel?

Ebert ultimately had a greater impact than Siskel. Perhaps if Siskel had lived longer into the DVD and Internet era, but with Roger's great social media presence, the fact that he maintained a highly active blog (that he always interacted with readers on), and his numerous books, it seems obvious why he's the more impacting of the two (although I liked Siskel as well).

W.W.G.D.
What Would Gibson Do?

Good question. I think it's been too long for Gene ... he died so young. Roger was the "bigger" sellout though as well. I really got to dislike him and disrespected his reviews for the last 10 years or more of his life.

YES!

I think Roger did more schmoozing and drinking, whoring, whatever with all these connected people.
I liked Gene too, probably better as a person. In the early Sneak Previews I agreed more with Roger,
but I grew to not really like him and in the last decade or so I thought he was on the take or working
for the film studios he was so tolerant of crap movies.






1) UnWatchable 2)Watchable,ButBad 3)Decent,SeeOnce 4)Good,Repeat&Recommend 5)Great,Classic