MovieChat Forums > Jessica Jones (2015) Discussion > Is it the actress or the character?

Is it the actress or the character?


I'm not familiar with Jessica Jones in the comics at all. Is it the actress' portrayal that I don't like or is it the character? I don't know but I can barely stomach watching her.

I'm more interested in what's going on with the divorce and Luke Cage...

reply

With all due respect - it's the viewer.

Not that there's anything wrong with that. But Jessica's character is just not for you I suspect. She's very, very different from most superhero tropes so I think it's just not your cup of tea - which is fine.

It's impossible to say if another actress would have made you feel differently, but I suspect it wouldn't. To me, Ritter did an amazing job portraying a damaged victim who is terrified of her own powers. But that's only my own opinion.

Reading my signature constitutes admission that I am correct. (Too late)

reply

It's the character. She was way less unlikable in the comics. No actress could have played it better with the characterization set down by the coordinators. You might actually like her if you read the Alias series.

reply

So it's the actress then? If it was the character she would have been unlikeable in all iterations surely.

It's true. If you type "Google" into Google, you could break the Internet.

reply

Just like there's no way to do a perfect adaptation of any story, the character didn't get translated exactly right in this one. But given how they had to change the relationship dynamic between her and Kilgrave, it makes sense her overall personality and behavior would be different. Doesn't make it better than the original story or characterization, though. So no, it's not the actress in this case, at least not for me, though I'd probably still dislike Jessica even if I didn't read the comics and know about her being different there.

reply

I'll read some of the comics just for some perspective... Thanks for the suggestion.

reply

a bit of both.
she is just another carbon copy of the strong female lead character all the shows are trying to push right now. she's pretty, she's gritty, she says whats on her mind and she doesn't take *beep* from anyone, oh, and she's model skinny so obviously she has super strength but she can be emotionally vulnerable to pander to the weak PC masses. it's getting old. when people get off the whole PC way of doing things and go back to being edgy, which is what got shows views in the first place.
the show isn't terrible it's just nothing special.
the Boss lady and the Black guy are good actors and characters but that doesn't save the lead.
i think a different actress could help but it's looking the part that matters. plus the show takes too many easy outs.

reply

[deleted]

PC *is* ruining the world.
But it did not ruin Jessica Jones, which was an awesome show.

reply

I'm not familiar with Jessica Jones in the comics at all.


Yeah, that's a mistake.

Is it the actress' portrayal that I don't like or is it the character? I don't know but I can barely stomach watching her.


It's the character. The acting is spot on.

reply

Yeah, that's a mistake.



Zardoz (1974) has spoken!
My top 100 http://www.imdb.com/list/ls079512886/

reply

Actress. Ritter comes off as rather a wooden actress without much dynamic.

reply

It's a bit more subtle in the show, but it's there - originally Jessica Jones was something of a happy normal single woman with her roommate / sister, in a world where people with super powers were somewhat routine. She took a swing at being a superhero, but wasn't quite adept enough to make it work, so she became a private detective. Kind of normal.

Then came Killgrave. The man who enslaved her and made her do whatever he wanted for eight months. He raped women while she watched, made her go out and hurt people, commit crimes, etc, etc, etc. She knew on the inside what was happening, but couldn't stop herself.

She finally escaped, and yeah - it left her pretty damaged.

IMHO Krysten Ritter nailed the portrayal of a broken, terrified, angry woman. She's Krysten Ritter, so the "before" part wasn't as happy/bouncy as the comic Jessica, but it's the after part that matters, and it's what made her such a powerful character to watch. If you've seen Ms. Ritter's other work then you should know that's kind of who she is, but I wouldn't fault her - she was cast perfectly for the role.

We're not supposed to "like" her - this show is telling a story.


--
Philo's Law: To learn from your mistakes, you have to realize you're making mistakes.

reply

I like the way you described this part of the series. If that's how the original is, then it was changed to be more acceptable in a few areas, or Jessica was. I've liked this series since it came on and keep re-watching eps, or parts of them. There are things going on I don't really care for, and wish they weren't there, but when good things happen, I keep hoping for more.
I'm basically surprised by Krysten's work through this show. It's complicated in places I'm not sure of, but I do want more to watch. This and DD are my favorite shows this year. -I think I got out of comics too soon.-


(My book series on Kindle or paper)
Life in... 2097
https://www.amazon.com/Life-2097-Jason-Wetzel-ebook/dp/B015D9Z97G?ie=UTF8&qid=1464124541&ref_=tmm_kin_swatch_0&sr=1-3

Life in... 2097: Where Are We?
https://www.amazon.com/Life-2097-Where-Are-We-ebook/dp/B01EU04VTG?ie=UTF8&qid=1464124541&ref_=tmm_kin_swatch_0&sr=1-1

reply

I put off watching the show because I was too indifferent to these characters. I had never heard of Jessica Jones before. But this past weekend I decided to give it a shot.

Having finished the show last night, it's basically good in the long run, but it's so bleak and touches on such uncomfortable issues for a superhero show like rape and Hope trying to have a miscarriage. If I didn't know better I'd swear they upped the sexuality in this show just as a middle finger to those DC trolls who call Marvel too "kiddie." Jessica and her friends make so many bad decisions they constantly make things worse, maybe on behalf of the writers so they could stretch out the show. If Simpson had shot and killed Kilgrave rather than tranquilize him that one time they could have avoided a lot of pain and misery.

Sometimes it feels like they want us to believe Jessica is struggling between the line of hero and vigilante. But THE DARK KNIGHT (2008) this show is not. As morbid as it is to admit, Kilgrave is one of those villains who should die.


http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply

I'd swear they upped the sexuality in this show just as a middle finger to those DC trolls who call Marvel too "kiddie."


The author of the Jessica Jones comics *did* do that to some degree - I believe that "Jessica Jones" was the first (printed) Marvel title to go without the CCA approval. From what I've seen of the comics (just excerpts, I haven't read them yet), the show actually wasn't as sexual as the comics were.


--
Philo's Law: To learn from your mistakes, you have to realize you're making mistakes.

reply

You won't be forced to watch that icky Jessica in order to see his story line.

reply

Yes, I'm very lucky and I get a Punisher series!!! I'm like a kid in a candy store.

reply

It's the character on the show. In the comics she was a lot more likeable.

Believe in yourself and create your own destiny.

reply