MovieChat Forums > Longlegs (2024) Discussion > SPOILERS The Longlegs character, which w...

SPOILERS The Longlegs character, which was the movie's big selling point, was largely redundant and useless.


So there's a scenery-chewing Nicholas Cage, playing a psychotic trans woman, and all they do is give one threatening speech, make some dolls in a basement straight out of Serial Killer's Home Journal, and smash their head in on a table.

Longlegs does nothing. Longlegs was a wasted character. They perform some obscure doll ritual to make fathers kill their families, but there is no immediate threat from Longlegs. The agent's mom was a bigger threat in this! At least she committed actual murder.

The movie could have easily been done without Longlegs participating at all.

They should have abandoned the stupid supernatural angle entirely and just made Longlegs a no-holds-barred creepy psychotic killer with way more Cage freakiness and a bloodcurdling backstory.

reply

"They should have abandoned the stupid supernatural angle entirely and just made Longlegs a no-holds-barred creepy psychotic killer with way more Cage freakiness and a bloodcurdling backstory."

100% this. This would have been so much better without the supernatural stuff.

reply

Agreed. It worked fine as it was, with that character.

There are films where the supernatural is a good thing, and then films like this, which would probably be far better without it.

reply

I do feel that the doll-stuff feels like a B-level Tubi horror movie trope. But the rest was good. I think they wanted Longlegs to come off more as a Charles Manson figure, who lets others do his evil deeds for him. He was able to turn Maika Monroe's mother, a good person, into an evil murderer by the end. In many ways, that's more frightening. People say Cage needed to appear more often, but the film handled his character correctly: keep him mysterious throughout the film. The less we saw of him, the more we had to rely on our own imagination to fill in the blanks

reply