Is 'one-night stand' a new term for Rape?

Too many ignorant comments. Do people not realize, that people are often having "one night stands" only because they are under the influence of something, primarily usually alcohol. She wasn't "outraged" by her rape ordeal, therefore, one cannot really class it as "rape". Saying to the doctor, she had unprotected sex with a guy, like it was no big deal.
Real rape victims are trumatized, and distraught. Sometimes contacting the police. She seemed to just act like it was some "one night stand" hence the subtitle.

you comment is dripping with ignorance.

first of all, being lesbian isn't a perversion, it's a sexual preference, and since sexual preference isn't black and white, she might have mostly sexual desire towards women but because her sexual desire towards men is so little she thinks of herself as lesbian rather than bisexual. I know a lot of people that say they're gay even if they sometimes engage in Heterosexual sex and vice versa. does it make those people bisexual? maybe, but their sexual preference and how they identify themselves is entirely up to them. not some holier than thou internet loser.

second of all, sex is good, that's why we all want to do it. which is also why so many men and women don't press charges when they are raped, they feel like their body betrayed them, because their bodies enjoyed it, when why do they feel violated? because just because your body acted in a way that makes it look like you enjoyed it, if your mind didn't, it's rape. our minds are the biggest part of who we are, so we should listen to it. it's completely normal for people to act like they enjoy sex even if they are crying on the inside, it's a coping mechanism, and just as normal as completely freeze or start screaming and fighting back. and just because someone agreed to have sex with you, doesn't mean you are entitled to sex. if at any point that agreement is revoked, you stop. if you continue, you are raping that person. it's as simple as that.

This is a completely irrelevant and hysterical tangent. Men absolutely can be raped by women and can be raped when drunk. Men patting each other on the back for it and telling each other they should feel lucky is not the work of feminism. It's the work of toxic gender roles which feminists are trying to stop.

The reason this was rape long before she said stop was because this man was a predator who roofied her drink. He was not also drunk. In situations where one party is drunk, the drunk party can call that rape. In situations where both are drunk, it is up to the person who is less drunk to say no or not initiate the action. It is up to the less drunk person to look out for obvious signs of "too drunk to consent," such as slurring, falling down, vomiting, losing consciousness, being incoherent, etc., and noticing whether or not the person has drank in excess in general. It is very rare that both parties are in that state because one party has to be coherent enough to initiate the action. And if ever in doubt, just don't do it. It's not that hard, I've done it myself.

Only 2% of rapists will ever see a day in jail. Stop pretending there is some pro-woman bias in the courts. Most women never even report in the first place, and of those that do, it's THEIR name that gets dragged through the mud in order to prove they are "pure" enough to be considered a victim. The majority of the time it comes down to he said, she said, even with physical evidence present, because nobody witnessed it so nobody can confirm she didn't want it. So knock this "booo hooo poor men who rape drunk women shouldn't be in jail" bit because they AREN'T in jail. This is REAL LIFE not Law and Order: SVU.