JUST WATCHED, NOT COOLER THAN SAM RAIMI'S SPIDERMAN

Your non sequitur is dismissed.

It isn't a matter of which would be better in real life. If it were, there are plenty of improvements that could be made. For example, give Spider-man the strength and durability of an enraged Hulk, and the ability to fly like Superman. It's about accurately portraying the character, and the character has mechanical web shooters; not just any mechanical web shooters either, but ones that he designed and built himself, which demonstrated his intelligence. The limitations of his web shooters (such as running out of web fluid or malfunctioning) were part and parcel of his limitations as a character, and were plot points in certain stories.

Exactly, many people say that Toby McGuire was a great Peter Parker but not the best Spider-Man, and Andrew Garfield was great at being Spider-Man, but a terrible Peter Parker. Tom Holland is able to be really good at both! He's a great Peter Parker and a great Spider-Man

And what you said makes sense because the director of Spider-Man has made indie films in the past. Many people complain about how there is too much comedy in the movie, but I loved it and it was one of the reasons this is my favorite Spider-Man movie. I like the teen comedy feel because it helps me relate to Spider-Man more because he's a teenager. It was so funny, and I think it worked

"yet never once NOT feeling like Steve Ditko's work come to life"

That's hilarious. I've already refuted your nonsense in another thread, and you resigned from the argument, thus tacitly conceding at the same time. Yet here you are, still peddling your already-refuted foolishness.

The 2017 movie got practically everything [drastically] wrong, yet somehow it feels like Steve Ditko's work come to life? LOL at that. Flash Thompson, MJ, Liz Allan, and Aunt May were nothing like their Ditko counterparts, and J. Jonah Jameson was missing altogether, as was Parker being a freelance photographer for JJJ's newspaper.

Even worse, Parker himself was nothing like Ditko's Parker:

Ditko's Parker was a loner, and he kept his secret identity, you know, secret. Homecoming's Parker had a buddy/sidekick (who quickly found out about his secret identity, followed by Aunt May finding out too) and was a valued member of some big "academic decathlon" team at school.

Ditko's Parker made his own costume, and it certainly didn't have an AI voice rigged up to it. Homecoming's Parker only made a crude version of the costume, and Tony Stark gave him the polished version, complete with the ridiculous Iron Man-esque AI voice.

Ditko's Parker didn't dream about joining the Avengers; he had no "hero worship" going on for anyone. He was arrogant, as demonstrated in TASM #1 where he broke into the Fantastic Four headquarters wanting to join their team (strictly motivated by money; he lost all interest when they told him they were non-profit), and acted like he was doing them a favor by joining their team. Note that this is a fundamental character difference compared Homecoming's Parker. It's like the difference between Alex P. Keaton and Skippy Handelman (Family Ties), or the difference between Spike and Chester (Looney Tunes), or the difference between the Lone Ranger and Tonto.