MovieChat Forums > White Bird in a Blizzard (2014) Discussion > Was the acting good...or terrible?

Was the acting good...or terrible?


There is something really really peculiar that I can't put my finger on about the acting in this movie....I can't tell what the hell is going on and what they were wanting to go for in terms of stylization of acting. Like with traditional in-person theater, you'll see people exaggerate some aspects more - in order to project in a large stadium. Or with the 1920s-1940s they were purposely acting in old Hollywood's distinct theatrical style - which nowadays films want to echo here or there when wanting to give a respectful nod to the time period (hence Di Caprio's and others' acting in the Gatsby remake or various of the side actors' quirky style in Boardwalk Empire).

For some reason Eva Green was acting in that style. Christopher Meloni (go SVU!! w00t) was acting well; Shailene was sometimes acting well, sometimes being a bit forced; and a lot of the side actors were just outright forced and comical? I couldn't tell if they were purposely doing it to evoke a certain era. Or if there were just moments where the acting was just weird and almost brazenly fake and forced by the actors? Or is this just a feeling I'm getting? Maybe it was meant to be done that way because they wanted to make Green's mental state that much more obvious??

reply

Personally I thought the acting was crappy, especially Shailene. The poor acting itself was the reason I am on IMBD right now. I just wanted to see I wasn't alone on this. Green was good but somehow it didn't fit well with the other actors.

reply

I think I may be the only person on this thread who thinks that all of the actors involved did a great job (except I thought Kat's friends were kind of weak and forced at times, especially her gay friend, who seemed to just be a "typical gay guy" trope). I feel that every actor and actress had their characterization down, and that they were pretty consistent. I think the stylization that some people here have stated had a purpose -most notably Meloni's and Green's characters seemed exaggerated, because as viewers, we are relying on the narration of Kat, and therefore the storytelling reflects her perspective. Kat even said it herself, that growing up her dad was always weird and wimpy, and her mom was always pretty much bizarre, crazy, and seemed jealous. Therefore, her perspective on what she had to deal with on a daily basis was exaggerated by showing her parents be just like that, like how she explained them to her therapist and others. I mean, everyone has the tendency to exaggerate when they tell a story, and I think that's how Kat's version of the story is told.

Kat on the other hand, I believe is a very apathetic and jaded individual - much like most (if not all) of the characters in every other Araki film. I think the only main character I can think of that wasn't apathetic was Faris's character in Smiley Face, but then again she was stoned all the time, so I guess that could count as apathetic - and plenty of other characters in that film just seemed "over it" constantly. I am pretty sure that Araki must really relate to that feeling of apathy and just enjoys personifying it in his films, and also in a comedic way, to show how apathetic he is about his apathy (if that even makes sense, lol). I thought that Shailene's acting was very natural, and any weird quirks and mannerisms added to the conflict that her character felt - apathy and emptiness towards her mother, loneliness and abandonment in her love life and relationship with her mother, concern and confusion about what happened to her mom and why she left, and also I think a large part of her that worried about WHY she didn't feel sadder about her mother's disappearance, and also that she would never get over that part of her life and move on.

Anyways, as you can tell, I am a very huge fan of Araki's films, but that is not the reason why I am conjuring up all of this theory. I'm just saying what I personally was thinking throughout the movie because there are some bizarre moments and strange occurrences and I mean, I have had my fair share of strange and bizarre people and events in my life, and people acting somewhat over-the-top in REAL LIFE, so to me, this movie doesn't even seem that unnatural. LOL But I could see how it could be perceived as such.

Also, let me just say that I finally watched Kaboom the other night and I really enjoyed it, but the ending was a HUUUUGE let down. So there, I'm an Araki fan but I can admit his faults. :P

reply

It was very uneven. I felt the director was more worried about lining the shot up perfectly (I admit he's good with that) than telling the actors what to do. Meloni was solid and Woodley was okay for the most part, but everyone else seemed to be confused as to what they should be doing. Tom Jane seemed to be on auto pilot as The Punisher and Eva Green was still Ms. Ives from Penny Dreadful. Angela Bassett has a thankless role as the therapist, and everyone else save Gabourney Sibide (who is always delightful) was forgettable to bad.

reply

I believe they could do the best with the poor writing and weak direction of the film.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2604794/

reply

Acting was terrible. Even "Stabler" was bad.

reply