Unnecessary nudity
Don't get me wrong I'm all for late teenage female nudity, but the main girl in it seemed to get her kit off for no real reason. Didn't seem to add anything to the story.
shareDon't get me wrong I'm all for late teenage female nudity, but the main girl in it seemed to get her kit off for no real reason. Didn't seem to add anything to the story.
share[deleted]
Others might point out that clothing is unnecessary and that nudity is the more natural state. After all we are born nude.
..*.. TxMike ..*..
Make a choice, to take a chance, to make a difference.
And pre-teens and teens become sexually developed years before the age of 18, it doesn't mean they should have sex.
A good review of "Inside Out": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXC_205E3Og
"And pre-teens and teens become sexually developed years before the age of 18, it doesn't mean they should have sex."
Yeah well they always did, are still doing and will always do anyway. They don't need your approval, fortunately.
Let us know how that works out in a snow storm.
shareI was quite surprised, I'm used to seeing Shailene in teenager type roles, was not expecting to see her boobs.
shareIf you know any girls, they generally do tend to be naked during sex--it makes penetration a lot easier. As for looking at themselves naked in a mirror, I'm pretty sure they do that too.
Moreover, a pretty young female checking out her nude body in a mirror is VERY cinematically appealing in itself. You don't have to justify it. It's like filming the sun setting in the ocean. Who the hell cares if it's "unnecessary"?
"Let be be finale of seem/ The only emperor is the Emperor of Ice Cream"
There is no such thing like unnecessary nudity.
shareHave you ever seen a Gregg Araki film before? I have not seen them all but this is VERY tame for his work.
shareWhere was the yummy male nudity?
shareI know the actress isn't 17 but considering she is playing a 17 year old the nudity does seem a little inappropriate.
share