MovieChat Forums > Spring Breakers (2013) Discussion > Honest discussion about this movie?

Honest discussion about this movie?


I am a 27-year old male. I did not watch this movie when it first came out because it's advertisements were very clearly geared at young females, and to a lesser extent young males. It made it seem like another party movie. Last night I got over this fact, and I had literally forgotten that Selena Gomez, and some blondes from shows that my girlfriend watches were in it. Honestly, had I remembered that, it would have been enough to keep me away from watching it. Once you take out that hype, and just concentrate on the movie itself, it was really good! The art direction was really well done and they story did play out to the end.

I would like to know actual reasons of why you did or did not like it.

reply

Uhhh, cuz it had no plot, storyline, or reason for being? If I want to watch "art", I'll go to Moma. Fortunately, it was free on Amazon Prime. Otherwise I might've had to kill someone for my $10 back

I suppose you're gonna say, well, it was about 4 girls who go to SB and find and learn about themselves, and that there's no place like home. Keep in mind, you're 27, and that means, for many reasons, you don't know beans yet. I've passed more interesting gas than this garbage. There was no quality to it whatsoever

reply

Well, I did see this movie in theaters and I liked this movie enough to buy it on Blu-Ray, but I can really see why a lot of people didn't like this movie. Personally, I enjoyed it, even there were flaws about it and it felt like I was on some kind of trip. I did find some things ridiculous about it, particularly the ending, but I did kind of enjoy James Franco's role in it, as well as some of the music.

All I need is one mic...

reply

Social commentary. That's a reason for being right there.

reply

What social commentary? That you can package garbage and sell it to people like you and call it art.

There is more social commentary in an episode of jersey shore. Go see Kids or Natural Born Killers for a movie with social commentary. Seriously, if I filmed my foot for 30 minutes it would be more intellectually stimulating than this crap. I will never cease to be amazed at how gullible some people are.

reply

I'm pretty sure your foot isn't a commentary on the nihilism and sociopathic nature of today's youth

reply

Now that is funny. My foot represents the apathy of today's youth. The dirt under my toenails represents the emotion under the surface of our over medicated culture.

If that sounds ridiculous it is no more so than your take on this movie. I can claim whatever meaning I want, but in the end it is just a picture of my foot. If you believe that meaning is there in this movie you are gullible beyond belief or 13 years old.

reply

Or maybe you just didn't get it because you yourself are naive and/or 13

reply

Hehehehe. I really do not understand the logic behind someone so venomously hating on a movie. Don't like it? *beep* off to another thread/movie!! :)

www.usedrugsnow.livejournal.com

reply

the movie is very much polarizing, which you obviously see in the hatred comments.
i liked the way of editing, and i can see what the director likes to tell, but its definitely not my cup of tea.



www.welcometothemachine.at

reply

Go see Kids or Natural Born Killers for a movie with social commentary.


Actually, Korine wrote the script for Kids

reply

I actually gave Kids credit. This movie was a bomb! It was basically a movie for guys to see boobs. BTW I'm in St. Pete and just to let anyone know who wants to run down here for nude beaches.. they are not here in public as shown. Sorry.

reply

Does this kind of thing happen a lot in the US? Teenage girls joining the mob during spring break and committing mass assassination while dressed in bikinis? If not, how does such an outlandish scenario qualify as social commentary?

reply

Exactly. I think it was supposed to be a commentary on spring break culture (not necessarily spring break specifically, but that hedonistic excess), but it failed by taking it ridiculously far. Instead of forcing the audience to think about behavior that is common among college students it almost gives them the excuse of "well I'm not going to kill anyone on spring break".

"Just because you understand the mechanics of how something works doesn't make it any less of a miracle"

reply

This kind of thing doesn't really happen, however, young people do flock to beach towns and bring a lot of money to the drug culture in those areas. While these kids aren't actively participating in the violence, they are in fact funding and facilitating it, all in the name of "letting loose" and "finding yourself"

---
You'll never get what you want if you don't know what it is.

reply

Plot: Four college girls go on springbreak and get into some heavy *beep* some of the girls bail, while the others reveal their true nature


reply

And it was so easy for them to just bail and go home. No one thought they'd run to police.

reply

WTH What possible reason would there be for Cotty to go to the police? Missing prison? And Faith? Was Alien supposed to be all "Now that you know my first name (and apparently don't want to have sex with me) I obviously have to kill you"? I mean just imagine she told the police that a creepy guy bailed her out of jail! Ridiculous complaint.

reply

Keep in mind, you're 27, and that means, for many reasons, you don't know beans yet. I've passed more interesting gas than this garbage.
Well, he seems to be a 27 year old that can articulate himself pretty well, while that post uses the hyperbole, reasoning and vulgarity I would expect from someone half that age. Really, just being older doesn't make one more mature.

I thought was movie was boring at times, but interesting in how it gives a subjective view on a generation that thinks life has to be like MTV, but never really comments on it one way or the other. It also looks and sounds nice.

reply

If I want to watch "art", I'll go to Moma.


This is one of the dumbest things I've ever read

---
You'll never get what you want if you don't know what it is.

reply

[deleted]

I thought it was garbage. Poor script, ham acting (from Franco), wooden acting from the girls, horribly repetitive voice over, ridiculously contrived shoot out at the end.

A nice little T & A movie would have been much more preferable and no more shallow than the actual film.

What was wrong with the other three girls getting their tits out?!

Rated 3/10.






Looks bobbins.

reply

Man IMDB posters are retarded these days. I thought it as pretty good, absolutely stunning visuals and the whole tone of the movie is surreal, like moving through a dream. The people who say that it doesnt have a plot etc have no *beep* clue what they are talking about, its just one of those internet phenomenons where they get on the hate bandwagon because they cant think for themselves. If you want a plot, try following the religious sub-plot that is heavily integrated throughout the whole movie.

reply

Yea, right, lemme guess your age.... 23, and you're a fan of Sandler/Ferrell/Stiller movies. Please, get a clue. This is the kind of faux pseudo crapola that fools the average moron. It was garbage. I can take better pictures with my 1970s instamatic. Not impressed

reply

Well said, agree completely. Good call ignoring the idiot who responded to you.

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

Unless you just want to see girls in bikinis there really is nothing much to like in this movie.

It really wants to have some deeper meaning, some reflection on today's youth culture, but it fails miserably. It is no better than the trash it tries to satire.

I just can't imagine that anyone over 16 actually takes this movie seriously. And trust me, it's not that those of us significantly older don't get it. We've just been around long enough to see plenty of movies that brilliantly pull off what this movie wishes it could. I could make some pseudo intellectual argument for meaning in just about anything, but it is just not there in this sad excuse for art.

reply

EXACTLY, Mtedmonds

reply

I saw it opening night with my girlfriend, and there was no one in the crowd under 20, which made me very happy.

reply

So what exactly is your point? The only way you could know that anyway is if the theatre was almost empty.

If it was full, you are obviously just making something up since you would have no way of knowing the age of everyone there. Either way, that doesn't have anything to do with how good the movie is.

reply

To me this was an hour and a half music video. I liked the cinematography. I liked how they overlaid music that contrasted with the mood of the scene. James Franco was entertaining but overall I did not care for any of the characters. I did not buy into these girls going into self discovery. I appreciate the artsy fartsiness (the slow motion and repeating of lines) but dragging that out through the whole movie made it so bland and boring.

reply

[deleted]

Boring, long and drawn out, no real storyline, just an excuse to let four famous young girls grow out of their clean girl images.

And there was just too much nudity and too much of the same old rubbish I'm always seeing in every movie nowadays, especially those aimed at the younger generation - look at us we're getting drunk, we're getting high, we're walking around naked, we're going crazy, we're having sex, we're flirting with everybody and anybody, we're partyin', someone told me to kiss another woman so I'm doing it wooooooooooooooooooo!

Quite sad to think how many teenagers are going to watch movies like this and think 'This is how we HAVE to behave'.






Ashmi any question

reply

I thought it was a great satire; it's everything wrong with the youth culture – the stuff I may rarely acknowledge but am constantly aware of and surrounded by – made hilarious. The voiceover of the girls talking about (for example) how this is the most 'spiritual' place they've ever been to, while the camera shows them pissing on the sidewalk... and James Franco (the only actor I knew prior) is genius casting and ceaselessly amusing ("Look at my s...!") and then there's the Britney Spears scene, which is... there are no words...

The whole thing's all so trashy but it comes together into something brilliant and oh so funny to me in that dark comedy way I love. It's a cult film, and I'm not surprised people are gonna react to it differently – especially if you do find something glamourous or 'sexy' in the culture the film depicts (or worse, if that's why you checked out the movie). But yeah, I honestly just thought it was a wickedly enjoyable and hilarious... psychedelic head-trip of a movie.


--- grethiwha -------- My Favourite Films:
http://www.imdb.com/list/Bw65XZIpkH8/

reply

Good to see someone talking sense on this thread. I love it when a director uses subtle humor to highlight something bigger. There's always a downside to it because people wouldn't get the drift. The repetitive voice overs are deliberate and if you could just leave all biases and personal opinions at home, you'd probably get a different perspective about what the film is really about. It is beautifully layered. Conventionally, you would want a plot to have twists and turns and surprise you at intervals. But this isn't a conventional film. It speaks volumes about how something like spring break is glorified and how people are imitating *beep* like the American pie series in their lives . I watched this right after Le Grande Bellezza http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2358891/?ref_=nv_sr_1 and wasn't disappointed at all. Both films talk about the problem that is predominant in the popular culture. Though both styles are different, they are both beautiful in their own way.

Lick My Two Shoes

reply

I didn't find it to be great social commentary (and social commentary in movies is VERY overrated). It is somewhat satirical, but I don't think that is really the point either.

It is a very non-narrative film that relies on visuals, repetition, and music. Plot and dialogue are secondary to the point of being irrelevant. It's like an avante-garde film that Korrine tricked the Hollywood idiots into financing by casting James Franco and a bunch of Disney actresses in skimpy bikinis. People seem to bash on it for not being a conventional movie, but that is WHY I liked it. Movies in Hollywood are way too focused on plot, dialogue, character development, and so-called "realism" at the expense of anything else.

As for "you just want to see girls in bikinis" argument. Well, there are countless "Girls Gone Wild" type videos, 10,000,000 porno movies where the girls aren't even wearing bikinis and are getting penetrated six ways to Sunday, and there's even stupid reality crap like "The Real Cancun". I wouldn't waste my time with ANY of this garbage. This is really the almost of opposite of that "reality" nonsense--it's deliberately unrealistic or surrealistic with human caricatures and intentionally vacuous characters. Yeah, the girls in bikinis make it more interesting than "Trash Humpers", but that's hardly the only reason to watch this.

reply

I agree. I had only heard bad things about this movie, that it was trashy, had no substance, was only about girls showing their boobs. But honestly I was very impressed. It's a wicked, dark yet satirical ganster movie, and a very well acted and directed one. A great story about how things can descend into darkness while the people who are in the thick of it only see beauty in their downfall.
Really wasn't expecting anything like this. Great movie.

reply

Besides the ludicrous plot, the pretentious, self-satisfied writing, the sexism, the racism, and the ridiculous number of times the viewer has to suspend disbelief, the movie committed the cardinal sin of being boring. It's nothing more than a middle-aged man's wet dream.

The only reason I decided to watch it is because Manohla Dargis put on her year's best list. This is the last time I take her seriously.

reply

Really? Sexism? It is one of the most feministic movies of recent times...

reply

I liked it, but you could definitely argue it either way. There is a huge "male gaze" going on with the way the camera ogles nubile flesh.

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

Well, the ending though disagrees. The leading male dies and the girls save the day.
Also the way first half works is basically more of a Criticism and even Satire of the whole Spring break deal.

reply

I would say it's a classic "have it both ways" deal.

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

Also, how was it racist? Personally, I think the movie is actually trying to say something about class and race but I'm interested in why it could be read as racist.

---
You'll never get what you want if you don't know what it is.

reply

Although, again, I liked the movie, I can see how this could be argued. There were no black characters shown who came across as anything but unintelligent stereotypical gang-bangers.

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

And they were only cannon fodder. Made me a bit uncomfortable.

reply

Right, good point.

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

[deleted]