I don't think he would react with "How's your luck" or "Why me?" and other quirky phrases.
Death is looming nearby, and fast, and this isn't a day of leisurely fishing when the lures get tangled, or a day or carpentry when you accidentally hammer your thumb and curse "Why me?" or "That was smart!" He's morose, silent and very worried, and not to mention under the constant physical strain of exhaustion and hunger. I do not see much room for self-deprecating phrases when he's in that state of danger.
Him not speaking to himself felt natural to me, and that's how I imagine most would react. The fact most of us sit at a computer for a long time, highly entertained by the flow of videos, words and imagery, but still say absolutely nothing for hours, means humans don't talk to themselves that much. That's a film/TV convention and something more appropriate to Tom Hanks in the mainstream Cast Away (whose situation for a while was far more pleasant and less urgent than Redford's character, to say the least).
It was actually refreshing to see a film with no words, and have it all based on glances and action. I'm sure thoughts were running in his head constantly, but having that silence punctuated at even intervals by forced humor or levity would actually feel more unnatural to me. This film sets its own tone and its own terms early on, and a dialogue-free Redford seems consistent with the long takes and spare manner of filmmaking. And I noticed that the emphasis was on the ambient sound instead (the lapping water, cabin squeaks and storm clouds), all used to further the sense of isolation from civilization. It also seems to intensify the dominance of nature.
reply
share