People just don't get it apparently.
And that's fine. It wasn't made for you anyways. I thought it was a f'n hoot. Can't wait for the DVD.
share[deleted]
MovieChat Forums > Machete Kills (2013) Discussion > People just don't get it apparently.
The first one was more action based, this one was way more fun!
-=1000 travel books are not equal to 1 real trip=-
It was hilarious & kicked ass. People just suck
[deleted]
The first one was well done. Silly sometimes, that's true, but it made alot more sense and I liked the characters and the fluidity of the first story.
"Machete Kills" was just stupid beyond belief. Especially the El/La Camaleon that was played by Walton Goggins, and by Cuba Gooding, Jr, and by Antonio Banderas and even by Lady Gaga. It was a totally dumb unnecessary multi-faced character.
I expected something better than this after enjoying the first "Machete". I can't believe all those great actors and actresses actually allowed themselves to participate in such a dumb movie.
I won't bother to watch "Machete Kills Again....in Space". Heck, that title alone implies something could still possibly be even stupider than "Machete Kills".
Who'd've thought that that could be possible?
You must like every movie ever made then.
--
^Signature is below here
<-- I'm the first to ever use this icon
I loved Planet Terror and Hobo with a Shotgun. This was just lazy and bad filmmaking though. Like.. almost all of the blood effects was CGI! There's no fu##ing fun in digital blood.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
Shhhh, you just don't get it.
Laugh it up, fuzzball.
[deleted]
It's a movie done in the same spirit. This movie wasn't done as well, but it's the same spirit. Hell, they both spawned from a Grindhouse Trailer (I don't count Spy Kids). I'd like to know how you DON'T think they are related. Watch this movie again. Maybe you just expected too much from your first viewing. I do that all the time.
Laugh it up, fuzzball.
[deleted]
yeah, it's a blast! I mean I was never bored watching it. not that it was a great movie, it wasn't. but it was never boring and it just has so many things happening in it to keep you entertained. so many different characters doing interesting and entertaining things. it's so different, so creative, so original. but I didn't like the tone of it. it has a comedic and light tone to it. whereas the first machete had a sharp edged, balls to the wall, serious tone throughout most of it. and the first machete had a verve, an anything goes, and an unapologetic rawness to it that this movie doesn't have. so this movie doesn't have that same powerful, '80s action vibe and feel that machete has. also, the first machete has female nudity and lots of female nudity, whereas this movie doesn't have any female nudity so that drops this movie's quality down a lot. and that is another thing with the action and violence which made the first machete so good and so raw, it's explicit female nudity, that goes in the anything goes, we'll show anything category. what do you think of all this?
share