You're a Good Cop
I love that moment in the film. He thinks it's all coming to an end, and what more can he say? Such a perfect line at the perfect moment.
shareI love that moment in the film. He thinks it's all coming to an end, and what more can he say? Such a perfect line at the perfect moment.
shareI absolutely loved that. I think naysayers are underestimating both how this Batman/Wayne was written, and how much Pattinson is putting into this character, and that scene was one of the reasons why.
It was so awkward, but it was all he could say, and he felt like he had to say something.
The way he was growing so uncomfortable, while everyone around him was ignorant to what was before them, was powerful, as was his subsequent confrontation with Riddler. Pattinson was able to convey so much with body language, as well as with his eyes. Most superhero films rely on having the hero remove his mask for long periods of time, in order to let the actor act. Pattinson is the first I've seen who is able to do so much while in a mask.
shareUnrelated, check out Dredd if you haven't seen it. Karl Urban does fantastic with only half a face :D
Yeah, I totally agree. This movie didn't showcase Pattinson's range, but it certainly did show his ability to act within limited constraints. As I was watching, I actually thought of the movie Rover (also starring Pattinson lol), where Guy Pearce was able to convey so much of his emotional state with very little words, and only his expressions and body language.
Dredd is one of my favorite lesser-known superhero films, and Urban is great in it. I watched it when it was new in theaters and was shocked by how good it was, and finally had a chance to watch it again about a year or so ago, and it definitely held up overtime.
shareIt was very good there was no nonsense about him being tempted to, silence the threat. That would have just not fit any Batman presentation.
shareDidn't Affleck's Batman kill a bunch of people? Not specifically to protect his identity, but still, he was okay with killing. I think Keaton's Batman did the same, though in a more "for laughs" kind of way? Not that I disagree-- Batman should not kill anyone-- but it seems some presentations of the hero have not stayed true to that idea.
shareDidn't watch the Affleck movies. And I don't think Keaton killed anyone on purpose. Someone may have fallen off of something during a fight, but, not direct purposefully action type shit.
sharehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ULSvR6hhyI
shareGod. That was not good.
shareI always reference that scene when people complain about Batfleck. Batfleck didn't directly kill anyone on screen. Maybe the on-fire guy, but it's a comic book movie, so eh I'l let that slide.
Keaton straight up murdered that guy...with a psychotic smile!
(No hate on Keaton's portrayal btw. Long before Batfleck came on the scene, my friends and I had already discussed how Keaton kinda pulls off a deranged version of Batman that's often overlooked due to the films' overall campiness).
It fit the cartoonish nature of the film. It's more reminiscent of Tom & Jerry or the Road Runner, where characters are blown up one minute, then fine the next, than anything one experiences in real life.
shareBatman is responsible for a lot of bad things in Gotham specifically because he refused to kill people like Joker who then end up killing more and more innocent people. Batman should most definitely kill people.
shareHow should he decide who to kill? And once he starts killing, what differentiates him from any of the killers he pursues. They no doubt also have a moral code, and criteria for choosing victims.
shareThe decision is simple - those who have killed others and want to do it againt should be killed - Joker is a good example of this. What differentiates him from other killers is the people he would be targeting.
shareHere is better scene:
B: Your a good cop
G: Nah, just doin my job, man
B: Shutup! Your good
G: You Shutup!
B: I love you, man (They kissed)
G: You better kisser than detective
B: My bf say da same