Wow cool the 473rd Batman!
Next
Well look at how many villans haven't been used yet.
shareYeah, there's so many villains we hadn't seen yet like Clay-Face or Mad Hatter or Hugo Strange.
shareI've always wanted to see Clay-Face, and now's the time with all the advancements in CGI.
If this film ends up being the dark, detective noir that it's looking out, that'd be totally rife for a sequel with clay-face, with batman trying to figure out the presence of a shapeshifter.
Who’s left? Man-Bat? Hush?
I’m pretty sure we don’t need a Batman movie with Calender Man or Condiment King.
You're not really a batman fan, are ya?
shareActually I was at work and it was a bad day. Looking back, there's actually a few big villains that the movies could use as long as the writers don't mess them up:
Hugo Strange, Court of Owls, and Lady Shiva could work as main villains.
Man-Bat and Clayface, I don't know, those two could go either way.
Hush could work as a secondary villain but not as the main villain, not in a movie anyway.
Though I stand by what I said about Calendar Man and Condiment King, as well as Killer Moth and Fire-Fly. Could those four work with competent writers? Maybe. Do we want those particular characters as main or even secondary movie villains? I mean, I don't.
I’m pretty sure only like 20-25 of his villains have been featured in a movie. And he has well over 100.
shareWell, going off this particular list of top 25 Batman villains, turns out there's still a few on there that could work in a movie if handled correctly:
https://www.ign.com/articles/2015/06/29/25-best-batman-villains
Though if re-using villains is on the table, I'd like to see Mr Freeze, Poison Ivy, and Riddler get second chances. The Batman Arkham games have shown that they can work in a dark and gritty setting, even though their portrayals were based on the 90's Batman cartoon, which just does to show that even in a cartoon those characters can be taken seriously if done right.
Like there could easily be 473 more batman movies.
share