I couldn't agree more with the original question posed, the reality is that the Monarchy has to survive no matter what or who is sacrificed.
Not true…was never true, but now people understand it. And if ANY establishment starts sacrificing human beings to survive, then the establishment, whether it is a Monarchy, government, business, religion, or anything…then it should NOT survive.
And today, people know better and Britain is a democracy, not a dictatorship. And secondly, the Monarchy is not the one with political power; that belongs to the Parliament and Prime Minister; they are the ones who pass the laws.
Parliament is VOTED in by the British people, not hand-picked by some dictator; Britain is a free country, not some 1930's Nazi dictatorship.
The establishment couldn't have a future step-brother/sister to a future King who for 1) would be a Muslim & 2) would be mixed race.
Now they could…and Diana for one was infertile after she had Harry, so the whole possible new pregnancy myth was a moot point with her anyway…and secondly, infertility notwithstanding, despite what some mistakenly believe, Diana was in no way, shape or form planning to have a new baby at this point in her life.
Her sons were nearly grown; they weren’t little anymore and she herself was nearing menopause; she was not a young woman anymore.
Furthermore, the Monarchy has changed; they are no longer as racist as they used to be (Diana herself was part Irish Catholic, yet Charles married her and they had their two boys), so if Harry or George married a Muslim or woman of a different race or religion, it might draw some speculation, but it would not be considered some great “scandal” as it would have been in the past.
It was upsetting the Queen & other important people, so something had to be done. British history is littered with the corpses of Kings & Queens who have been killed.
In the past, yes…but let’s not confuse the past with the present. The Monarchy is NOT some Nazi mob organization. I can tell you’re buying that whole Diana was “murdered” nonsense.
Diana was NOT, NOT, NOT “murdered.” She died because she was leading the paparazzi away from the Ritz hotel so the other patrons would not be bothered by all the flashing, intrusive cameras.
She and Dodi had just had a fun night and drank loads of wine with their dinner, so they were slightly tipsy and didn’t realize two things…their driver was drunk and that the security guard was too busy checking his face in the rearview mirror to notice Diana and Dodi’s tipsiness or that they forgot their seatbelts and that the driver was drunk.
That’s how Diana died. She was a HERO, not some lame “murder” victim out of some bad spy/thriller/mobster film.
Diana was LEGALLY DIVORCED from Charles, so the Monarchy no longer had any hold over her; she did not have to answer to them any more. The only ties Diana had with Charles or Philip were thru her sons and even then, her sons were nearly grown at this point and away at school.
At this point, Charles was getting ready to have a Y2K wedding with Camilla, so he and his parents were paying scant attention to what Diana was doing since she was away from them. Diana was in NO way standing in the way of Charles re-marrying.
Charles and Philip treated Diana shabbily and have behaved horribly, but they are not that depraved or evil. Even if they had been, neither one of them are smart enough to plot some elaborate car crash scheme to “murder” her.
I think it’s disrespectful to her legacy to circulate these awful “murder” myths; the lies upset her sons, who want to remember their beloved mum as a hero, some “murder” victim.
Diana would be embarrassed red in the face and it would worry her to no end if she knew, wherever she is in the afterlife, that these lies were still being floated about.
The British public hate it because she fell in love with a Pakistani & an Egyptian which played to the racist part they keep hidden in these politically correct times.
Now that’s an insult to the British people…most British, like most Americans, Canadians, and other Europeans, are NOT that blatantly racist. Few people “hated” that Diana fell in love with anyone of a different religion.
Are you sure you don’t secretly harbor racist attitudes yourself and are projecting them onto others?
They were not that bothered when it emerged that Hewitt was having an affair with her and that Harry could be his ginger off-spring there were jokes about it in the media at the time.
Now let’s knock off that stupid myth about Harry! Harry is NOT Hewitt’s son. Diana did not meet Hewitt until Harry was TWO or so. Diana’s sister and mother had red hair; that’s where Harry gets his red hair, not to mention that some people on Charles’ side of the family had red hair.
Harry’s face looks like Charles. Diana would never be foolish enough to become pregnant from an adulterous affair, then lie to her own child about their parentage. Show Diana and Harry more respect than this.
Actually, Charles and his parents WERE more bothered by her fling with Hewitt than with either Hasnat or Dodi…because she was still married and because Charles’ own adultery with Camilla and Kanga had been exposed.
Charles HATED Hewitt and wanted him kept away from any polo field he was playing on. Hewitt himself was a jacka$$ who made money off Diana and betrayed her; she ended thing with Hewitt quickly. And actually, Diana never even slept with Hewitt; they just had a few necking sessions; that was all.
But Charles, despite his own affairs that he was trying to keep covered up, threw a HUGE tantrum over Hewitt; he didn’t really even pay attention to Diana’s flings with Hasnat or Dodi later since by then they were legally divorced and Charles was wrapped up in planning his wedding to Camilla.
Charles actually was bent out of shape again when Diana DIED…because her death put a wrench into his wedding plans and forced him to put it off until later, so he wouldn’t get the Y2K wedding he was fancying.
In fact, after Diana’s death, Charles broke things off with Camilla because in the wake of Diana’s death, it would make Charles look bad to be planning a wedding then and talking about Camilla. It would have been public suicide for Camilla to show up at Diana’s wedding with Charles also.
Falling in love with a non-white was the biggest no-no & it is speculated that she was pregnant at the time of her death, that I'm afraid sealed her fate.
No, she was NOT pregnant at all…like I said, the speculations are lies. Diana could NOT become pregnant again after she had Harry; her fallopian tubes were too damaged to release any more eggs (largely due to her bulimia).
No “fate” was “sealed” for her…since the divorce, she was free to sleep with and fall in love with whoever she wanted. And she FREELY chose to lead the paparazzi away from the other patrons. She just had the misfortune of having an incompetent bodyguard and a drunk driver….could have happened to anyone.
She died free; she died happy; and most of all, she died heroically protecting the people. Let’s honor her legacy as is, not repeat a toiletful of tabloid lies and myths.
When she was alive Charles couldn't re-marry so what happens, she is killed and Camilla who everyone loathed before, now miraculously love her & they change the Church of England rules for them to marry, this is so similar to how they covered up the JFK killing in the US.
No, they were DIVORCED…she was no longer legally or morally bound to Charles and he was no longer bound to her. Charles was perfectly free to re-marry while Diana was living. And Diana was fine with it; her heart had mostly healed from Charles and the divorce by 1996.
No one “killed” Diana…and Camilla really is still not very popular today. Like I said, Diana DYING actually hindered Charles and Camilla’s wedding plans…had Diana not had the misfortune of dying in that accident, Charles and Camilla’s Y2K wedding would have gone off without a hitch probably in June of 2000.
Diana’s death forced Charles to postpone his wedding until a few years after Y2K, which did not make Charles at all happy.
One last point, she was loved by the world for decades as long as she towed the line, when she wanted to be her own person the establishment using its many tentacles (media, cohorts, newspapers, Murdoch, conservatives, celebrities) all have tried to tarnish her for History, u just have to do some of one's own research to see the truth.
Not all the Monarchy was against her; actually toward the end of Diana’s life, the Queen herself gained a new respect for her when she saw all the good Diana was doing for the world.
And most of the world loved her even more when she disentangled herself free from that drama and mess that had consumed the House of Windsor and spoke out about what was really going on in that marriage.
True that Charles, his cronies and Philip did try to slander her and TRIED (but didn’t succeed) to ruin her reputation…but most of the media saw thru Charles lies and so did the people of the world.
Diana herself stood up for not only herself, but her sons and the people in her quiet, dignified, soft-spoken manner…which won her even GREATER worldwide respect and love.
Diana was a humanitarian, a beloved mum, a dear friend, an international ambassador, an advocate for the public, and most of all a world HERO, not some lame “victim” of some “murder” plot…so let’s be more respectful to the true memory of her and stop circulating these “murder” lies and “secret pregnancy” myths.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
I can see that u r a dyed-in-the-wool monarchist and would no doubt defend the Monarchy to ure dying day, but the facts dispute what u have stated.Firstly, Harry is probably James Hewitt's Son because of his red hair and he looks nothing like Charles. His racist views and wearing the Nazi Uniform was no doubt because he hated that his Mother fell in love with an Egyptian and a Pakistani Doctor. The Queen only made a statement after the British public made an outcry, the memorial has past into obscurity because it was an insult to Diana and no one thought it was a fitting tribute. They have basically erased her from History and memory and now Camilla is in the fold and Charles is making speeches against Muslims attacking Christians in the Middle East, Cameron has stated that multiculturalism hasn't worked and therefore Britain should go back to a mono-culture, in my opinion all these things are linked to the establishment and the powers that be.
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Now, let's knock off that stupid lie about Harry! It is well-known that Diana's oldest sister Sarah and Diana's mum have red hair...that's where Harry gets his reddish hair from.
Hewitt's an opportunist who made money from Diana, so if Harry had been his son, it would be a sure bet he'd come forward again and demand a paternity test, so he could then cash in on the glory of fathering a kid belonging to the Princess of Wales.
And Diana is NOT stupid; she would NOT be irresponsible enough to bear a child from adultery and risk a huge scandal with an innocent child right in the thick of it.
Not to mention that Harry was already a toddler by the time Diana had the misfortune of crossing paths with that stupid Hewitt toad.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
And Diana is NOT stupid; she would NOT be irresponsible enough to bear a child from adultery and risk a huge scandal with an innocent child right in the thick of it.
In regards to that point, I am certainly not saying that she was stupid... Diana however was not afraid of scandal or speaking the truth she gave an interview on British TV 4GodsSake that scandalized the whole House of Windsor & that's another reason for the murder theory...
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
In regards to that point, I am certainly not saying that she was stupid...
Diana however was not afraid of scandal or speaking the truth.
She gave an interview on British TV for God's sake that scandalized the whole House of Windsor and that's another reason for the murder theory...
Puuleeeeease...we're talking about a shy, quiet mouse of a lady who was afraid of her own shadow, let alone scared of scandal, gossip (which you appear to enjoy), and speaking before the entire world.
Did you actually watch the whole interview??? The woman could barely control her trembling.
Not to mention her swallowing several times, clearing her throat a couple if times, and blushing nervously a few times.
Also, her body is tense; her head is ducked while she looks up timidly and speaks in a soft voice.
But she was brave in feeling her fear, yet not letting it stop her from doing the right thing by her people.
She knew she owed it to the people and her boys to temper Charles' cruel slander.
Charles was the one who had no scruples about causing one scandal after another and also of damaging the House of Windsor through his lies about his own wife, the mother of their sons.
Diana's interview only "scandalized" Charles, Philip, and SOME of their Palace cronies...because Charles and Philip were finally exposed for the frauds they are.
Even though the Queen was peod at first, she came around in time and gained a new respect for Diana for telling the truth.
And as I said before and you apparently missed...neither Charles, Philip or any of their cronies are smart enough to think up any elaborate car crash scheme that might backfire.
I notice NONE of the "conspiracy" to "murder" wackjobs have been able to answer this question I've posed, you included...why risk some complicated car crash ruse that was no guarantee and that she might have survived?
Why are you having so much trouble accepting that this shy timid woman was a hero who died protecting others?
Are you craving drama so much that you feel a need to twist quiet, soft-spoken, sweet Diana’s life into some bad mobster/gangster fanfiction?
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
Did you actually watch the whole interview??? The woman could barely control her trembling.
Not to mention her swallowing several times, clearing her throat a couple if times, and blushing nervously a few times.
R u kidding me, she ARRANGED that interview to publicize what the Royal family were doing to her, she knew how upset they would be & even
she wouldn't have thought that they would have gone to the lengths that they did to shut her up...
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
R u kidding me, she ARRANGED that interview to publicize what the Royal family were doing to her, she knew how upset they would be & even she wouldn't have thought that they would have gone to the lengths that they did to shut her up...
Naturally, she arranged the interview. How else can you have an interview?
Still didn’t ease Diana's nervousness and fear. Of course, she knew CHARLES AND HIS MINIONS would throw their tantrums because this interview was for the benefit of the PEOPLE, not to flatter either Charles or Philip.
And if you really watched her interview, you'd know that despite her saying what was really going on, she NEVER said anything remotely negative about Charles or ANYONE.
And what she discussed...her bulimia, the affairs, the low self-esteem, her pain...none of it was really news...she was just merely comfirming what was true and tossing out what was NOT true.
She also was reassuring the people that she was here and NOT pining away in some mental institution or dead from suicide.
She was telling us that as long as she was alive, she would NOT abandon the people to Charles’s malicious lies and slander.
Watch the interview on YouTube and see Diana swallow several times in her fear, especially when she talks about her fear of being put in a mental hospital.
Charles was the one who needed to be "shut up"; Charles was the one running his vile loud mouth slandering Diana and spreading horrible lies about her.
Quiet, mousy Diana just gave the one QUIET interview then went about her business raising her sons and continuing her outreach work.
She was NOT the one slandering anyone nor was she causing trouble for anyone.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
And as I said before and you apparently missed...neither Charles, Philip or any of their cronies are smart enough to think up any elaborate car crash scheme that might backfire.
These people have had the best education money can buy with a lineage that descends centuries. They have access to all the military intelligence & politicians that they want, they r wealthy beyond ure or my dreams have the ear of the world's leaders & r u seriously telling me that they r NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH to come up with something that will eliminate a thorn in all their sides!!!
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
These people have had the best education money can buy with a lineage that descends centuries. They have access to all the military intelligence & politicians that they want, they r wealthy beyond ure or my dreams have the ear of the world's leaders & r u seriously telling me that they r NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH to come up with something that will eliminate a thorn in all their sides!!!
Lol!!!! We're talking about Charles the insipid Toad here and his imbecile dad, Philip here.
Sure they have millions and fancy titles and access to fancy schools...but all those millions will NEVER buy either Charles or Philip the necessary ingredient of pure INTELLIGENCE.
And it's laughable to suggest that all the world's leaders, especially Diana's GOOD, LOYAL FRIEND, Tony Blair, would take any slander from Charles or Philip seriously at all.
If Charles or Philip had come to any leader or politicians with complaints about a timid little mouse like Diana allegedly being a "thorn in their side," they would have been LAUGHED out of the room, not taken seriously since most world leaders, politicians, and higher government intelligence KNEW and RESPECTED shy, quiet Diana.
Not only Tony and several other world leaders were good friends of Diana's, so was Hillary Clinton.
If you're mental enough to suggest people like Hillary and the White House and the whole Parliament and US Congress were allegedly "in" on some "murder" plot against shy, mousy, timid, kind, nervous Diana, I'll fall over from laughing so hard.
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Far from being totally "erased" from history, memorials and books honoring Diana are abound worldwide...not to mention the billions of websites dedicated to her.
Diana's boys, the queen, whether you want to believe it or not, and Diana's siblings would NEVER have allowed her to ever be simply deleted from history.
And Camilla and Charles' marriage is NOT happy either and Diana's sons will definitely NEVER think of Camilla as a mum figure at all; Diana will remain FOREVER in both sons' hearts as their true and only mum.
Your likening sophisticated LONDON, ENGLAND to some 1950's racially segregated Mississippi or Alabama is laughable and ridiculous...London hasn't been "mono-cultural" for at least a hundred or so years.
Diana herself has Irish Catholic blood in her, so she and her family are part of the multicultural society and world.
Mono-cultural countries are a thing mostly of the past.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
I see u never addressed the issue of Harry's racist remarks against Pakistani's & wearing the Nazi uniform or training & fighting on the front-line in Afghanistan, that boy has a lot of hate in him for brown people & I think we can guess why...
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
I see u never addressed the issue of Harry's racist remarks against Pakistanis and wearing the Nazi uniform or training and fighting on the front-line in Afghanistan, that boy has a lot of hate in him for brown people and I think we can guess why.
Because there's no proof of any "racism" on Harry's part. Provide the links on any alleged incidents of Harry making any "racist" remarks or shut up and stop slandering poor Harry.
I do hope neither of Diana's sons or any of the Spencers or any of their friends, including Diana’s friends see your slanderous accusations about Harry...or be prepared to face a lawsuit for slander and/or libel.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7822883.stm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/prince-harry-racist-remarks
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/jan/12/prince-harry-video-pakistani
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-01-12/uk/28050830_1_racist-remarks-british-army-racist-term
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/4586296/Prince-Harry-in-new-race-row-after-telling-comedian-Stephen-K-Amos-you-dont-sound-black.html
R those enough for U
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Harry apologized for those incidents which happened YEARS AGO. Did you yourself read the article? It was a friend of Harry's in the first instance and it was affectionate bantering, not some mean-spirited attack...and Harry did realize late how others were upset by it and apologized SINCERELY.
Harry still needed his mum even more than Wills and he had been badly wounded by her death. Harry and Wills both went through a TERRIBLE time for several years after Diana's death.
The Palace sure descended into a noisy, hot, sun-glaring, chaos after Diana died...without Diana’s siblings, close friends, and Queen Elizabeth, the boys would have had no one.
Diana didn’t take life for granted;she knew as a famous figure, she was at higher risk for a premature death...so she planned with her siblings, mum, and dearest friends, who all cared for her sons, to help look after her sons in the event of her death.
Please, please...make sure they are not alone if I die too soon was her soft, but powerful plea.
Harry did get a bit wild for several years after Diana's death and did and said some things he now regrets, but it was his late mum's spirit with the help of Wills, Kate, the Queen, and Diana's siblings that pulled Harry from the brink of disaster.
Diana planned well; she knew how deeply her sons loved her, but she knew she could fall to the misfortune of a premature death.
Harry has straightened up his life immensely since then and is now taking up his mum's outreach work in Africa. Diana's spirit from the afterlife in addition to the loving memory of his mum no doubt moved Harry in that direction.
Face it, scandals, wild behavior whatever...both sons will FOREVER remember thier beloved mum.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
It was a friend of Harry's in the first instance and it was affectionate bantering
for one thing it was Harry himself who said it, it was all over the media at the time & it wasn't that long ago. 'affectionate bantering' that is what all racists say when caught out & tell me was that Pakistani cadet in on the jokeas Bernard Manning used to say when making racist remarks...
You sound like a monarchist apologist & cant see whats clearly in front of your eyes, u r deluded...They hate their mum & it's due to the influence of their Grandfather who is a well known racist, just google him & it will curl ure hair...even Charles has moved away from tree-hugging & visiting mosques & wanting to be the leader of ALL faiths,since Diana's death he's living it up with Queen Camilla...
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Oh, I've read about Philip's stupidity and ignorance...which is why he doesn't have the brains or the the respect of world leaders to carry out any complex scheme, especially against a quiet mouse like Diana (whose brain could run a million loops around Philip's, Charles’ and Camilla's put together.
No, Wills and Harry do NOT "hate" their mum...which tabloid fanfiction are you getting this from????? Lol.
Her sons are long on their own and do not live with either Charles or Philip.
Charles yes, has been living it up with his moronic wife since BEFORE Diana died and is still having affairs with other mistresses behind her back.
They bicker behind closed doors almost constantly and don't sleep together anymore, so things are not all rosy with them either.
Charles is actually now badmouthing his own oldest son and his daughter-in-law just the same way he trashed Diana because he's jealous of the attention Wills, Kate, and little George are getting.
Really pathetic toad Charles is. Thank Heaven he and Moron Camilla are not young anymore.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
Diana's boys, the queen, whether you want to believe it or not, and Diana's siblings would NEVER have allowed her to ever be simply deleted from history.
"Diana's Boys" they haven't mentioned her since her death, Harry is playing naked games in Vegas & the other one has married a drone without anything in her head & they r now laying low till the next stage managed occasion to just keep the line going...
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
What does any naked games Harry does have to do with anything??? And Kate is intelligent and interesting...sure she's more outgoing and bolder than timid, shy Diana ever was, but she's about as solid as Diana was and like Diana, they are raising their son (and soon more to come) quite well so far.
The sons, while not talking about their mum incessantly, do mention her, visit her grave from time to time, and carry on her legacy in quiet, but meaningful ways.
Wills passed on Diana's wedding ring to Kate mire than TEN years later when they married.
Wills and Harry put on a memorial concert TEN YEARS after their mother's death...hardly sounds like they've "forgotten" her, have they?
More evidence that Diana is FAR from "forgotten" by her sons...
http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/110289/diana-remembered-on-15 th-anniversary-of-her-death http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/prince-william-and-kate-middleton-hon or-dianaa-s-memory-2479370.html
Nine days ago, while the rest of the world fixated on every last detail of their impending nuptials, Will and Kate took a boat to his mother's final resting place.
The couple spent a quiet day at Lady Diana's remote burial site, and walking the grounds of the nearby arboretum where Will and Harry planted trees alongside their mother as boys.
"It was very important for William to take Kate to visit his mum just before their wedding day," a royal insider told the Daily Mirror.
"Diana is still a huge part of her boys' everyday life and always will be."
This was particularly true today, as William bit his lip nervously, standing at the altar with his bride, just as his mother did on her wedding day.
It was a reminder to the millions of viewers who've watched the prince become a man, he's still his mother's son.
http://celebritybabies.people.com/2007/08/31/princ
es-william/
Prince Harry, 22, Prince William, 25, and their royal family and friends gathered to remember Princess Diana who passed away in a tragic car accident 10 years ago.
Prince Harry, who was 12 when Princess Diana died, said at the memorial service,
"To lose a parent so suddenly at such a young age, as others have experienced, is indescribably shocking and sad.
To us, just two loving children, she was quite simply the best mother in the world. When she was alive, we completely took for granted her unrivaled love of life, laughter, fun and folly.
She was our guardian, friend and protector. She never once allowed her unfaltering love us to go unspoken or undemonstrated.
It was an event which changed our lives forever, as it must have done for everyone who lost someone that night.
But what is far more important to us now and into the future is that we remember our mother as she would wish to be remembered, as she was: fun-loving, generous, down to earth and entirely genuine."
The memorial was held at the Guards’ Chapel near Buckingham Palace.
Both Harry and William were responsible for organizing the service and for them it was a tribute to a mother they loved and adored.
Hardly sounds or looks at all like two sons who've "never" mentioned or "never" remembered their beloved mum and all she did for them, does it?
reply
share
BoultersCanary
11 years ago
other one has married a drone without anything in her head
Taking after his father then?
The church may shout but Darwin roars
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Not at all...but now Charles is married to a real moron without an intelligent thought in her head...what a contrast from the quiet, intelligent Diana.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
The 'Murder' theory is not a lie, only recently it was stated that an SAS soldier knew of the killing, do a google search, it was in all the papers...
reply
share
11 years ago
[deleted]
Humanity2869
11 years ago
The only thing that is extraordinary about the evidence is that anyone coming forward to the police is immediatley gagged & never heard of again... She & Dodi were murdered & it was a cover-up...I don't believe everything I read in the papers I am going on the letter written by Diana in her own words that she was going to be killed & the protestations from Dodi's Father who has said that they were murdered... It will one day all come out in the wash...
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Right on, mhansen!!!! Finally some sense here! No evidence at all of any "murder."
None of the Royals are bright enough to dream up any complex car crash ruse that Diana, who was a sturdy woman, might have survived.
These "murder" fanfics would worry Diana to no end.
reply
share
11 years ago
[deleted]
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Agreed, mhansen2-961-763053p...Diana might have very well survived that crash...then what?
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
No, it's a fat lie that the tabloids made up. And drama junkies are gullibly buying the story hook, line, and sinker.
Neither Charles or Philip are bright enough to dream up any complex car crash ruse.
The fact that you blindly believe that "it has been stated" that some SAS soldier allegedly "knew" of a "killing" is laughable.
There are a lot people who will claim they "knew" about anything, even if it's a lie, just to get their name in the papers and on the news.
Sure the "murder" fanfics were in "all" the papers...the tabloid ones.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
People like Philip & Charles only have to show their displeasure & the people that matter take notice. The amount of secret societies that exist in Britain are too numerous to list but I can assure you that this crime of Diana & don't forget Dodi Al Fayed was the biggest injustice since JFK was assassinated... I & millions of others believe they were murdered & one day in the future all will be revealed... Only last week a Panorama prog was one exposing the secret undercover unit in the British Army that were dressed as Irish people in plain clothes committing murder in Ireland, that is just an example of how the wool is pulled over the eyes of people to achieve a goal...
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Definitely a tabloid drama junkie here...I suppose you believe in the nonsensical fanfiction that JFK was killed by this huge international collusion of "everyone" from the US Congress, the CIA, the U.N. and all of their mothers.
These "murder" fanfics from the tabloids that the drama junkies are brainwashed into believing are quite entertaining really...they often make me laugh.
Diana herself would laugh at these little fictions if they didn't involve people she cared about.
Here's a fine Royalty fanfic site you can post your gangster!Royals/murder victim!Diana on...
http://royal-fanfiction.tumblr.com/fanfiction
I know there are other gangster drama lovers who'd enjoy your fanfics there...check out that site and post there.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
U r losing it...
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Sounds like you've lost it years ago. Nutjobs like you are the ones that worried Diana just about the most...in addition to the homophobes and how the the Reagans (truly a scary couple) frightened her back in the 1980's.
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
The woman herself told u what she was going through in interviews & letters, this is not tabloid rubbish just take a look around, can u see her living? no she is dead & I am theorizing that the evidence is there to suspect foul play. It's really ultra-monarchists like u that probably have pictures of the queen all over ure house with a shrine built to them that are walking robots...
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Sure, Diana told people what she'd been through. And yes, she's no longer here on Earth. But she died because she was protecting the other Ritz Hotel patrons from media intrusion, NOT as a result of some "murder" plot.
I love darling Diana and have lots of pics of Diana in my place.
It's insulting to her legacy to depict her as some lame damsel-in-distress sitting about helplessly awaiting her "murder" when common sense tells MOST of us that if she suspected any of the other Royals were out to "kill" her, she’d be taking steps to protect herself and her sons and her siblings.
reply
share
eamonn7
11 years ago
by
Coryraisa
But she died because she was protecting the other Ritz Hotel patrons from media intrusion, NOT as a result of some "murder" plot.
Explain how she was protecting the patrons you fool as she was with her lover leaving to go elsewhere and didnt leave because a few journos where outside, so how is that protecting the guests ?
reply
share
Coryraisa
11 years ago
Explain how she was protecting the patrons you fool as she was with her lover leaving to go elsewhere and didn't leave because a few journos were outside, so how is that protecting the guests?
They were headed back to Dodi's place after eating...and they wanted to lead the press AWAY from the hotel and the other patrons...at Dodi's place, the media would probably camp out there, but Diana and Dodi would be in a private place where no one else was.
That way, no other people would have to have cameras all over the place. That's how Diana's death was heroic and a sacrifice for the people. It was just her bad luck that the hotel had an incompetent bodyguard who failed to realize that the driver was drunk; the bodyguard was too enamoured with his own image in the mirror.
Diana and Dodi had earned a fun night out and were a bit tipsy...that's where the bodyguard should have stepped in...Trevor should have seen Diana and Dodi's tipsy state, seen that if the driver was drunk, gone back and demanded a SOBER driver.
If Trevor had been doing his job and if Paul Henri, another oaf, hadn't been irresponsible enough to get behind the wheel of a car after drinking, both Diana and Dodi would still be alive today.
That's the story, NOT some stupid "murder" plot...Charles and his minions are not that bright.
reply
share
BoultersCanary
11 years ago
The amount of secret societies that exist in Britain are too numerous to list
Yeah, there's the House of Lords, the SAS, the paramilitary wing of the Boy Scouts, the WI, the EFDSS, the RAC.........
The church may shout but Darwin roars
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
Ever heard of the Freemasons? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-528751/Freemasons-open-lodge-Buckingham-Palace--Queen-isnt-amused.html
http://now-here-this.timeout.com/2013/08/11/londons-top-ten-secret-societies/
http://www.eliteukforces.info/rumours/sas-secret-societies.php
reply
share
BoultersCanary
11 years ago
I have not only heard of the Freemasons, my uncle was one. Nothing sinister about them at all.
http://now-here-this.timeout.com/2013/08/11/londons-top-ten-secret-societies/
All dead (with the possible exception of the Catholic one) and they were mostly societies for would-be witches or to give rich alcoholics some drinking company. Terrifying .
http://www.eliteukforces.info/rumours/sas-secret-societies.php
Paranoid drivel.
The EFDSS is MUCH more scary than any of those. They do Morris Dancing!
The church may shout but Darwin roars
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
my uncle was one. Nothing sinister about them at all
no, really... doesn't a mason have to do a favour for other masons? what happens to equality if employment is the issue & the employer is a mason? how about having a noose around your neck & blood oaths etc...occult behaviour? what about the revelations from ex-masons & the sinister things that go one...
reply
share
BoultersCanary
11 years ago
doesn't a mason have to do a favour for other masons?
Within the law, yes.
what happens to equality if employment is the issue & the employer is a mason?
The Masons are very firm believers in meritocracy.
how about having a noose around your neck & blood oaths etc..
How about it? Have you been reading Stephen Knight? He had an agenda, you know. (I don't know what - perhaps his mother was scared by a mason when she was expecting him)
what about the revelations from ex-masons
Yep, you've been reading Stephen Knight.
& the sinister things that go one...
What sinister things?
The church may shout but Darwin roars
reply
share
Humanity2869
11 years ago
No, I haven't been reading Stephen Knight, I am going more on Aleister Crowley & ex 33 degree masons revealing that the Freemasons actually worship Lucifer & the Gods of the ancient Egyptians... They are only told the truth after they reach very high in the organization when they have too much to lose if they leave...
reply
share
BoultersCanary
11 years ago
Aleister Crowley? A relentless self-publicist (even more so than Princess Diana), drug addict, racist, misogynist and inventor of a dodgy religion.
What he never was was an actual Freemason. He seems to have been involved with some of the more esoteric fringes of masonry (like the Order of the Golden Dawn) and claimed to have been more involved than he actually was and to know occult secrets about the order (which nobody else seems to know) - but he is hardly the most reliable witness to anything. The man was a serial romancer.
The church may shout but Darwin roars
reply
share