MovieChat Forums > The Equalizer 3 (2023) Discussion > WTF was he thinking with that kid at the...

WTF was he thinking with that kid at the begining?


Denzel went from badass to dumbass pretty quickly during the opening sequence. As a veteran, highly skilled & experienced spec ops agent, he takes out an entire gang of dangerous gangsters & when he comes across a suspicious kid who's clearly connected to the gangsters he just killed, he casually turns his back on him, even after assessing him as a potential threat? Umm.. what? As just a random guy watching a movie, in real time I was dumbfounded by what he was doing before the kid of course shoots him in the back.

I understand it not being in his character to kill the kid just to be on the safe side but it would have been common sense to at least make the kid get out of the car to verify that he wasn't armed & then watch him leave the area, in an opposing direction. But nope, rather he leaves the kid sitting suspiciously behind a car door with his hands completely hidden & turns his back and does the slowest beeline walk of all time away from the kid, leaving himself completely exposed to a rear attack & gets shot like an idiot. Honestly this was so dumb that it almost took me out of the movie. If they needed him to get shot to set up his whole bonding with the local townsfolk plot, they easily could have come up with something that didn't make him look like a total fool. It would have been one thing if it was used as a plot point as a sign that he's getting old & losing his edge but nope. We don't even get that. Just a random, inexplicable brain fart that never gets brought up again. Very strange

reply

I agree, it was a really stupid thing to do. He could have easily tied the kid up or locked him up somewhere. The only thing I could think of that might explain his terrible decision is that the writer wanted to show him as someone willing to bet on such a young kid being fundamentally good.

reply

It was a plot device to simultaneously get us back to seeing him as the good guy (not shooting the kid) after massacring the house AND to have him need saving by the Italian good guys.

reply

The writers had to take away his plot armor to set him up as a convalescent in this scenic little Italian village.

Honestly, I was disappointed by this movie. Apart from that one mistake -- which looks very contrived -- they just overdid it with how badass Denzel's Robert McCall is. He's just made of awesome. He can effortlessly take down small armies of well-armed, hardened mafiosi, without even breaking a sweat or getting out of breath. With equal effortlessness, he can breeze into their homes and move with greater stealth than any ninja who ever lived. He never makes mistakes, gets backed into a tight corner, has a tough time with a particular opponent. The outcome is never in doubt. Everything is too easy for him.

reply

Right when he turned around to walk off, I was like, "Ummmm, are you sure you wanna do that?". One second later...

The writers could've come up with a better way for him to get shot if they wanted to lay him low for a bit.

reply

To show he was getting older and losing his touch. And BS that anyone thought the kid was going to shoot him. It was a nice surprise.

reply