Are Turks Turks?
t's happening again just like with The Hunger Games (Katniss had olive skin in the books). Rose wasn't white, she was half-Turkish and there are many passages in the books describing her dark eyes and eyebrows and hair and olive-like skin tone.
I don't understand why so many people these days seem to think that anyone with slightly dark skin is not white.
When I was a kid racism was not as discredited as it is today. Lots of people still believed that race was important, that races were not equal, and that the white race was the most superior race. Being very white myself, with very pale skin, red hair, and blue eyes, I didn't see much wrong with that idea.
I could have classified anyone who was not as white as I was as a nonwhite and thus inferior. But instead, being a nice kid, I had the attitude that anyone who was not clearly black, or yellow, or red, was white, even if they were much darker than me - and almost everybody was darker than me.
These days there are fewer disadvantages to being classified as nonwhite, and thus less meanness in classifying other people as nonwhite. But I still can't help being shocked by the way some people seem to restrict being white to people of Germanic, Scandinavian, or British ancestry and consider all other Europeans and Mediterranean peoples to be nonwhite.
To me all Europeans and Mediterranean peoples are white.
Are Turks Turks?
That may seem like a silly question but I say that kind of question can be asked about almost every nationality, and get the same kind of ambiguous answer, because Turks are only sort of Turks. For example, I believe that the people who call themselves Russians should really call themselves Moskovites, and the people who call themselves Ukrainians should call themselves Russians.
Much of Central Asia was inhabited by Turkish peoples in the Middle Ages and still is. Turkish peoples are part of the Mongolian or Yellow race, in so far as they can be classified racially, and thus are nonwhite, so half Turkish Rose could be considered half white - perhaps.
One of the main concerns of the present Turkish government is doing all that it can to prevent any international discussion of the Armenian Genocide during World War I. And yet that same government is doing all that it can to imply that there was a much more terrible and bloody genocide during the foundation of Turkey.
Many Turkish tribes invaded the Middle East in the 11th century AD under the Seljuks, and some of them invaded Asia Minor, then part of the Roman or Byzantine Empire. After the terrible Battle of Manzikert in 1071 Turkish groups poured in to settle and conquer Asia Minor. In 1461 the conquest of Trebizond completed the Turkish conquest of Asia Minor.
In the 11th century there may have been about twelve million people descended from various Mediterranean (and thus more or less white) ethnic groups living in Asia Minor, which was called
Rum or Rome by Middle-Eastern peoples because it was part of the Roman Empire. And about one million Turkish people are believed to have migrated into
Rum over a period of several centuries.
So the Roman or Byzantine natives greatly outnumbered the Turkish immigrants. And yet the Turkish government has Turkish school children sing songs about their Turkish ancestors in Central Asia without mentioning their Byzantine ancestors in Asia Minor. Thus the Turkish government implies to its people and thus to the world that modern Turks have no Byzantine ancestors and
Rum was turned into Turkey by a series of terrible massacres - the Byzantine Genocide - which make the Armenian Genocide seem small.
Fortunately genetic studies indicate that the citizens of Turkey ware mostly descended from the Byzantine population of
Rum and only a little bit descended from Central Asian Turkish peoples, and so the Turks are not really very Turkish. So the Byzantine Genocide never happened, and Rose's Turkish parent should have been mostly white, not nonwhite.
Saying that Rose is not white because she is half Turkish doesn't make any sense.
reply
share