It addresses institutionalized misogyny, yes, but Ella's subplot still depends on men. Without her romantic subplot, she couldn't get her story out, thus exposing them. A man betrayed Ella and passed her story onto another man who then passed it onto the school counselor (a woman). A case could be made, however, that Frank was only acting out of concern for Ella when he gave up her story she wrote for the class. That being said, her entire subplot still depends on men. It also began with a man raping her and giving her syphilis. (Not sure how spoiler-y all of that was, but putting it under a cut just in case) Men betraying and exploiting her, but men none the less.
Also, the movie ends with both women going off in separate directions to be with men, romance implied. Hardly a man hating note. As another poster noted, a man saves the day in the 3rd act. With these two things in mind, male viewers are reminded that if they persevere and play the white knight, they will be rewarded with romantic female company.
And as another poster noted, Clara was forced into sex work by a man. I'd say that's pretty evil. Not sex work in and of itself, but being forced into it. That sort of thing exists today, as well, in all parts of the world.
My point, is that while the film addresses some very real things that happen to women (and can happen to men too, betrayal, rape, stds and being forced into sex work), men are still along for the ride at every turn and are rewarded by the narrative.
All of that being said, I realize that Clara/Ella's relationship was not working out and both were, at times, very unhappy. The film shows us that they could not continue on that way, which is why it ended the way it did.
It's interesting that you consider a film addressing institutionalized misogyny as man hating. Consider that most films are marketed towards men and made by men.
reply
share