A) A truly stimulating piece of art ideally doesn't have to cost anything, anyone can make it. If the economy wants to forsake art, that would be good in my view, because the economy bastardizes everything.
B) Good and smart people have always been the minority, but good and smart films always get made by the people who are willing to make them, people who care more about art than money.
C) For better or worse, we are stuck on a planet with a huge variety of people, many of whom choose to be monsters, choose to be ignorant, and choose to do the wrong thing for a short reward.
D) I was a young person, and I grew up on Hollywood tripe, but I didn't like it as much as the deeper, darker gems that I sought out for myself from the incredibly diverse library of films the world has created over time.
E) The people on these boards are a very small group of people, usually snobs or fanatics.
F) The obvious point: that if true art was taken by the consumer, it would be thrashed. We don't want that. I am glad that a film like "Melancholia", an unabashed art-film with blockbuster production values, gets made. I do not care if it is adored by everyone, or if they sell "Melancholia" posters at Wal-Mart.
G) "Melancholia" is a film about a minority justifying the mass-murder of herself and the majority. Why would the majority of people like this movie? People who are cowards, afraid of pain and punishment and their own inevitable retribution? Humanist films are more popular.
H) If the state of film gets too heavy to bear, the levee will break. Film as an artform is relatively young, there is no shortage of brilliant ideas that have yet to be explored. Some of the most groundbreaking advancement in cinema will be made intently on the cheap, by whoever cares to experiment with the art.
reply
share