MovieChat Forums > Kaboom (2010) Discussion > What kind of ending was that?? *HUGE s...

What kind of ending was that?? *HUGE spoilers*


Seemed pretty cheap to me! Although it was relatively interesting, what mostly held my attention throughout the movie was wondering how everything was going to play out in the end. I couldn't wait for the sci-fi stuff!
The payoff? A brief series of scenes reveal the secret a few minutes before all the main characters simply take a header off of a frickin' cliff. Cut to world exploding -The End, exit to the left please.

BUT WAIT! Add a little salt by immediately cut to giant graphic: "Why Not? Productions", which invokes a nonchalant passivity that seems in line with the amount of effort they seemed to put into said ending.
All that build-up just to have the movie end abruptly enough to make it seem as if the screenwriter(s) just threw in the towel. "Frick it, the world explodes, let's go grab a beer.".
"Yeah, why not?"

So the plot seemed like more of a simple conduit for showing much homosexuality (was there accidentally a 'straight' character in there somewhere?) rather than much else. Except for the hetero sex which later turns out to have been unintentional incest.
Was this just kind of a homosexual promotion (homo-promo (sorry!)) type movie?

Still a decent movie, I suppose. Just seems like they could have done a lot more with the ending. Anyone else get that impression?

K, I can't stop. Here's my take on the movie:
Masturbate, Party, Sex, knife-wielding furry. Lesbian sex, gay sex on the beach, Looney Tune stalkers, sex again, mom sex, heroic faucet, 3-way!! Mass-kidnapping, everyone dies and kaboom. Just thought this was going to be somewhat Sci-fi or something. Anything other than what it mostly was.

reply

Just saw the movie and i agree. The last 10-15 minutes did give you a what the hell just happened feeling. the last scene was extremely disappointing

reply

Ah, but did the world explode? Smith's father is seen pondering whether to press the red nuclear button in an all white room, which is how Smith's visions/dreams were presented. Perhaps the end of the world was just a dream? Or perhaps the majority of the film was an hallucination? A lot is made of SMith eating a biscuit (at the party where the girl vomitted on his shoes). Perhaps the biscuit was loaded with drugs?


Now put that gun down Heidi! You’re not solving anything by massacring people!

reply

verry good observation drhelenarussell!

reply

Ok, at first I was WTF about the ending, but then I came to the conclusion that Smiths father realised he couldn't save his son, daughter or disciples from the cliff fall, so pressed the button. Kaboom.

reply

Ok, at first I was WTF about the ending, but then I came to the conclusion that Smiths father realised he couldn't save his son, daughter or disciples from the cliff fall, so pressed the button. Kaboom.


That's the impression I got, too, especially since it was mentioned that some of the cult members had psychic powers. When Smith's dad "saw" that everyone in the van was going to die, he knew that his son would not be able to take over the leadership of the cult as he planned. So, he decided to just end everyone and everything by blowing up the planet.

I also got the feeling that none of the other cult members had any idea that the dad had the ability to cause that explosion, since they all thought that the world was going to end with a lot of calculated nuclear blasts.

reply

well said, esp the bit about throwing in the towel. i actually enjoyed the movie and was sorely disappointed with the end. whoever wrote the ending needs to be bitch slapped, -immediately!.

reply

while i enjoyed the ride (up till the last minute anyway) it writes off the movie for me!. and that is a real shame.

reply

the whole scene with them in the car was like D'fk!! What is happening....
like it seemed like a big "and then" ending.....where they have taken the story as far as it could go. and wrapping it up to tie up all the loose ends all the pointless character they introduced and say see there were important. and it was like WTF!!!!
And then it ends....

it just seems like one big trip,....or a crazy dream....where like a lot of things happen but you don't really know how it ends....and you know what, in dreams you dream but you never remember how it ends so its like the end doesn't matter...it's was came before it that was interesting and you remember that.

Oh and i don't think this movie got lable right. comedy, sci fi, mystery....okay ill give you the mystery. i didn't find anything funny about it.. i actually found it scary.....i was a lone at home watching it at night and kept thinking someone with animal masks were gonna take me....but

I guess im saying i didn't like it but i didn't hate it either...

reply

I thought the ending was f'in brilliant. Bear with me.

This movie belongs to a genre which might be called Puzzling Weirdness, which in turn is a subset of the Puzzle movie, in general.

There are certain rules that anyone writing a Puzzle movie follows, when it comes to revealing What's Actually Going On. A Rulebook of Revelations, if you will.

One rule is to spread your revelations out over the whole third act of the movie. Another is to arrange the pieces of the puzzle so that they are revealed in the most dramatic possible order.

And the biggest rule of all is show, don't tell. For instance, if there is a character who is Not As They Appear to Be (and there almost always is), show us: let us see them doing the thing that is shockingly out of character so that, after a moment's thought, we suddenly realize Who They Really Are. Don't just have them show up and announce that they've been a double agent (or whatever) all along.

Kaboom breaks every one of these rules with giddy, gleeful abandon. In fact, almost all of the revelations come in the space of two or three minutes, and they are almost all in the form of Characters Who Know telling the Characters Who Don't Know what's going on. Precisely the way you're not supposed to do it.

So at this point the movie has become a commentary on our need to have our puzzles explained for us. The actual explanations offered -- and this is crucial -- are 100% satisfying in terms of quality science fiction; they only come across to some viewers as silly or inconsequential because of the intentionally rushed delivery. So the movie completely has its cake and eats it too; it's at the same time a very satisfying puzzling weirdness mystery and a wicked satire of same.

Immediately after this comes the movie's only action sequence, and it's extremely well done given the low budget look of the rest of the film. And it ends in the most realistic way possible: once both vehicles are headed down the "Bridge Out" road, there's no stunt-driving epiphany, they just all apparently go off the cliff.

Since all the characters in the movie are now dead, having Smith's dad trigger Armageddon (and I took the final "exploding planet" shot to be symbolic of the nuclear war being started, not literal) then becomes meaningless! By killing every character in the movie off, and then the rest of humanity about five seconds later ... the movie is basically saying, these are fictional characters who have no life once their story is over, and it's a fictional world that has no existence once the story is over, so why not kill all the characters and then everyone else on the planet? The movie's over; they have no life either way.

It's not for nothing that Smith is a film major. This is a very self-aware, postmodern flick.


Prepare your minds for a new scale of physical, scientific values, gentlemen.

reply

Okay, emvan, I initially thought the film had the most annoying ending of any film ever, but now I realize it's the most pretentious ending of all time. Thanks for clearing that up.

I was really diggin' this oddball Donnie Darko wannabe (complete with Frank the Bunny Rabbit) until the absurdly fast-paced climax and abrupt conclusion. Like most viewers, I was looking for an offbeat Sci-Fi thriller with a reasonable (albeit likely implausible) ending, not an annoying "look how clever we are" social commentary. It's pretentious crap like that which killed Joss Whedon's "Cabin in the Woods" for me too.


reply