MovieChat Forums > The Next Three Days (2010) Discussion > What I didn't like about the movie.

What I didn't like about the movie.


Granted, the movie wasn't terrible, I've seen worse. It could have been better and there were many areas it could improve upon, most notably casting and acting.

However, here are the things that killed it for me:

1. College teacher is smarter then the police?
Not just any police either, but I got the impression from the film that the lead cop was someone high up on the food chain.

2. Brennan plans very carefully, but neglects to notice that the birthday party will be at the zoo? Dude, read the freaking invitation.

3. Brennan wields a gun with some skill, and gathers enough gumption to do a one man raid on a meth lab. Really? That's a little far out there.

4. Said meth lab is only protected by a wily dog, some big guy, and a dude who stupidly promises to kill Brennan. Here's a hint, when a guy is really desperate and has a gun in your face, don't promise to hunt him down and kill him. If that were me I just might shoot you in the face and save myself from the sequel.

5. After going through all that, his wife wants to throw herself out of the car?
That was absolutely terrible writing.

6. Then, finally, we are treated to an epilogue where the detective, who obviously couldn't care enough in the beginning of the movie, decides to look for the button, and doesn't even find it even though we get to see it. I mean, what was the point of that scene? Was it to prove to us that she didn't do it? After everything Brennan went through, I honestly don't care if she did it or not. the scene only serves to give us some satisfaction that - hey - she was a good guy all along and deserved to be free.

Is that suppose to make me feel better? Brennan still had to kill someone (even if he deserved it) so that makes only one murderer on the loose.

Now, if the detective had found the button then it would have served as some Gift of the Magi type of irony. That she might have been set free after all so all of his efforts were in vein, yet none of which would not have come to pass if he had not set those events in motion in the first place.

Although, I don't see how a single button would have exonerated her, regardless of who it fell off of.

Now that I'm on a rant...

7. What's with that girl asking if that is what the detective calls coffee? Is that the same girl from the beginning of the movie at the restaurant? If so, who gives a crap. Its a pointless scene. That should have been on the cutting room floor.

8. Speaking of pointless, the other mother - Karen's mom what was her name... Nicole? Whatever, too much camera time for an unimportant character.

9. She? Yes, that is what Brennan's wife said when he came back to the car and reported that "she" had taken their son to the zoo. The tone in which implies jealousy. Really? The man just popped a meth producer, dumped a dead meth dealer, robbed a meth lab, doctored records, B&E, struck in officer, BROKE YOU OUT OF CUSTODY, and then dragged your whiny useless ass through the streets to save you and your family and you want to inquire about a supposed relationship with a woman you don't know.

And then throw yourself out of a car?

Poor acting.
Poor casting.
Poor writing.
Poor directing.




There is no flavor text!

reply

1 - 6 I think your criticisms are a bit overreaching. This is not a documentary. Much of it seemed plausible as movies go.

7. What's with that girl asking if that is what the detective calls coffee? Is that the same girl from the beginning of the movie at the restaurant? If so, who gives a crap. Its a pointless scene. That should have been on the cutting room floor.

Answer: Yep same girl. I laughed out loud. A bit of comic relief. She played the perfect over-the-top bitch.

9. She? Yes, that is what Brennan's wife said when he came back to the car and reported that "she" had taken their son to the zoo. The tone in which implies jealousy.

Response: I agree. That was weird. Not sure what that was about.


Poor acting.
Poor casting.
Poor writing.
Poor directing.

My Take: I thought the acting, the screen play and the directing were all exceptional.

reply

I didn't read your entire post. But why would you NOT think that a teacher and or professor is smarter than a detective? No offense to law enforcement officers but most teachers have a masters degree and most profesors have phds. Most detectives have high school diplomas and are trained to think like a criminal, in order to track them.

reply

i really dont know, why the OP first had the time to view it, then plan out the questions and then had enough time to write it here and start out a rant!i cant understand, in most of the movies of this type, which involves a little out of the ordinary happenings and doings, by the lead role, people try to criticize it to that much extent. its a movie, not that its any equal to the bourne series, i mean no comparison here as i feel the bourne series is the best agent type movies, involving the cop chases and all lying low stuff...i feel rather good about this film, and it was a good viewing, why cant u watch a movie just for the movies sake?why it cant be digested smoothly?...

reply

I enjoyed your rant and I agreed.

reply

[deleted]

It could have been better and there were many areas it could improve upon, most notably casting and acting.

i stopped reading after that

HP is a bad ripoff of LoTR
http://www.mugglenet.com/hpvslotr.shtml

reply

[deleted]

hahahahahaha college teacher is smarter than the police?? preschool teachers are smarter than the police, why do you give police so much credit? many are just guys who were punk kids with ego problems that wanted to feel superior, they are not intellectuals by any stretch.

reply

I'm replying to your old post, but I have to disagree on pretty much all counts. I thought this was an amazing movie with a lot of heart.

Just randomly picking one issue from your post... #9. You bring up a lot of reasons why the wife shouldn't be jealous, but most of those things she doesn't even know about. All she knows is that Crowe just broke her out of prison and her son is staying with another woman. I would understand some questioning jealously there. "Who is this woman?" "Why does she have my son?" Maybe even asking herself, "has my husband had a lover all these years that I've been gone?"

But that may be over-analyzing. In any event, I loved the movie and thought it was great drama and action. It is a stretch that a regular guy could pull this off? Yes, but clearly he is no regular guy. Most regular guys wouldn't even consider a jailbreak.

Regarding #1, remember at the end, the cop says something like, "And this guy's a teacher?" So I guess he was as surprised as you were. :)

reply