Why didn't it work?


On paper, this series should have been a monster. Not a King Kong sized monster like Lost, but a serious contender. I have started watching it again, and the first episodes are good. What went wrong?

Here are some of my thoughts:

1. The characters were not interesting enough.None of the main characters, like Mark, Olivia or Dimitri grabbed me.Compared with Lost where you had Jack, Sawyer, Hurley and Kate. You cared about them all stuck on that island.

2. The Flash forward was too short a time frame, it should have set 12 months ahead rather 6 months.

3. Too many characters were FBI agents which then made a show a police procedural rather than a sci-fi mystery, or worse, a hybrid of the two.Why not have a priest or even a writer?

4. The action should have been set in other cities or countries. The black out was global, yet we only saw glimpses of the rest of the world.Heroes was a able to covey the impression of various characters from all parts of the globe.

5.The producers cast two actors(Sonya Walger and Dominic Monahagn) who had been in Lost!To me, that indicates a lack of faith in the whole project.

I would love to know what others think.

reply

Not a bad critique of the series. I must commend you on bringing some sound reasons to the table for why the show failed instead of just saying it sucked. I kind of disagree about the characters not being interesting. I actually found them all amusing in one way or the other. I really enjoyed Monahagn's character. I think that part of the reason why it failed was it lost direction mid way through the season. It wasn't clear where the writers were taking the series. It wasn't until the last few episodes that it regained some of its focus, and by that time it was to late. Also, the writers overly embraced the idea of being the Lost successor by directly taking story telling devices from lost and using it on the show (flashbacks, episodes focusing on one character). They also took some things from 24. But the main reason the show failed is because of peoples poor attention span. Today people have no patience. They are not willing to allow a show to work out its problems. They expect it to be perfect from the start. For a show like Flashforward (or even the Event) that isn't possible.

reply

I really, really enjoyed it and Idk why it didn't work, because there are other shows that IMO are not as good and they are still doing fine.

I'm sad it got canceled.

reply

Your arguments and pseudo-analysis is ridiculous.

1. May not have worked for you. But the characters were well played and easy to connect to emotionally

2. ludicrous argument; A flashforward of 4 weeks would work just as well as one of 52 weeks

3. FF is fully scripted-serialized. There is not a shred of police-procedural in it

4. FF does take a global approach a'la heroes et al

5. WTF

Opinions where opinions are due, but dazfiddy is a moron. If this post wasn't that lengthy I would have judged it to be a troll-post

-==-
Life's too short for mediocrity
Best shows:http://www.imdb.com/list/n9h_caKA-ZU/

reply

[deleted]

To me this whole show was a travesty. The actors are decent but were far from decent in this, which makes me think the directors and writers are to blame for this huge debacle. The actors couldn't exactly convey a sense of reality. The idea behind the show is brilliant, the execution was extremely awful.

reply

1. LOST eclipsed this show..I was watching this at the same time as Lost and it got pushed to the side.
2. It was a great show but it didnt get good until the second half
3. Was underpromoted after the hiatus...I remember watching the first 10 episodes and then being like where did this show go?
4. Not enough strong leads. Courtney B vance was excellent and sonya fogler but I think they could have had 2-3 strong supportng male/feamle actors to carry the side stories.

reply


I agree with much of your analysis. I loved the idea of the show but along the way things just weren't clicking.

First, I found it odd that out of the whole world it would be the LA FBI office that is leading the investigation. Shouldn't the main FBI office in Langley take up the lead? Did the Brits, Russians and Chinese have nothing to contribute?

Yes, most of the main characters I didn't really care about. The marriage difficulties of Mark and Olivia seemed small potatoes and inconsequencial compared to what had just happened.
I liked the Ricky Jay character, he seemed poised to be an intriguing baddie but then he dies after 3 episodes. Bad mistake I thought.
Similarly the Shoreh Aghdashloo character could have been interesting but was underdeveloped.

It was silly that if Mark knew a team of bad guys was going to break into the building and attack the office, why wasn't a team of SWAT guys waiting around the corner?

I think in a show like this the writers needed to know before hand exactly what was going to happen in every episode before any shooting began. Map it all out precisely. Maybe they did, but it didn't feel that way, usually it just felt haphazard.

As someone else said, many of the episodes just had too much filler with maybe 5 minutes of plot advancement. I don't mind some red herrings and dead ends but that ratio of filler:plot should have been better. They could have taken a couple lessons from the writers of 24 (or even looked at Babylon 5.)

In the end, a sad waste. I think it deserved a second season and I would have liked to see what developed. But, now we never will.

-Doughdee222

"Fire me, boy!"

reply

[deleted]

Characters are of course important, but otherwise I don't the other points really matter. I think the most crucial flaw is that the whole series became a description of a self-fullfilling prophecy. Almost none of the events would have occurred if they hadn't seen them in the flashforwards. This was the ultimate flaw in my view.


Blogs:
entertainment-evolution.blogspot.com
inacompleteworld.blogspot.com

reply