Which subplot was more terrible?
1. Joker-Harley love Angle.
2. Natasha-Hulk love Angle.
Both are terrible. But the Joker-Harley thing, was more terrible. Not true to the Comics.
shareYou are correct. Both are. However, I cannot believe that while you have been a defender of this movie, you have the courage to go against it in this matter. Hat off!
FROM:"Save me Batman, please, save me" WB and MOS TO:"Save me Product Placement, save me" WB and BvS
And Natasha Bruce relationship was true to comics?
shareDont know. Never read Avengers Comics.
shareDont know. Never read Avengers Comics
This sums up about 80% of MCU fansAdults
I think 20% is pretty generous. Not that it really matters either way.
shareI really don't buy this argument. The COmics aren't True to the COics. There are multipel interpretations and coninuities. WHile I can appriciate disliking certain reimaginings, especially if it alters a core principel fo the CHaracter, the idea that Joker and Harley have to have only an abusive Relationship, and the Joker absolutley canot Love her is silly.
Actually it is true to the comics
Hulk/Natasha isn't true to the comics and completely made up
MoS|BvS|SS|WW|JL-1|Flash|AM|Shazam|JL-2|Cyborg|GLC
I will say number 2.
share[deleted]
The most evil thing done in this movie is when Harley stole something
[deleted]
All stuff we have seen in plenty of movies before
& they were more anti hero instead of outright bad guys
I'll go for number two.
Joker and Harley being together, has to happen in some form or other if both characters exist in the same medium.
That's how the comics go, having them be independent of each other honestly would be weird. Their very origins are tied together.
Natasha and Bruce suddenly being so deeply in love was just included cause Joss Whedon loves the "Beauty and Beast" dynamic, but wasn't interested in giving it any build up or explanation.
Natasha/Hulk. It came totally out of left-field.
shareNatasha/Hulk. It came totally out of left-field.Not to anyone who pays attention.
What is their to pay attention to?
Movie One, they barely interact. He intentionally terrifies her once, and then almost kills her leaving her clearly terrified and uncomfortable afterwards.
Movie two, the two are so hopelessly in love she can calm down the Hulk merely by being there (something Betty never could), and feels ashamed at the fact she can't carry his child.
Forgive me, but what were we supposed to be paying attention to?
Pretty ladies can always calm the Hulk down.
Uh oh spaghettios - Zack Snyder, David Ayer, Bryan Singer (2016)
Really? After "love is for children" and so on from Natasha I was totally not expecting it.
share2. Natasha-Hulk love Angle.Better than anything in the DCEU.
Really?
So to be clear your saying on single unexplained, unearned and impossible to support romance that came out of nowhere, served no real purpose, and at the end of the day was disliked by everyone down to the actors themselves, was absolutely better than everything over the course of three films?
Here's your explanation... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqKQ5d-QcVw
Uh oh spaghettios - Zack Snyder, David Ayer, Bryan Singer (2016)
Are yes, nothing says love more than purposely scaring someone to the point they nearly sick an army of goons on you.
Just look at the stars in her frantic eyes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlQ_thbFtDA Look at the way she's looking at him when she says "I've seen worse". You can tell she wants the green D.
Uh oh spaghettios - Zack Snyder, David Ayer, Bryan Singer (2016)
You can.
I just see a dismissive flick of the eyes.
Reguardless even you have to admit its a bit of jump to go from squint and you might see a drop or two fliting, to being deeply in love with each other.
Those are called f--k me eyes.
Reguardless even you have to admit its a bit of jump to go from squint and you might see a drop or two fliting, to being deeply in love with each other.Well clearly some time has passed between Avengers 1 and 2, so I would assume they got to know and understand each other a bit better in between the two movies.
Those are called f--k me eyes.
Well clearly some time has passed between Avengers 1 and 2, so I would assume they got to know and understand each other a bit better in between the two movies.
The problem is as we didn't see the development, it makes it appear left field.I agree that it would have been nice to see the development, but it didn't really bother me that much.
Its difficult to care about a relationship without any explanation for how it came about, or any demonstration of why it exits.They both bring each other back to the main fight in the third act. That's pretty cool imo.
I agree that it would have been nice to see the development, but it didn't really bother me that much.
They both bring each other back to the main fight in the third act. That's pretty cool imo.
He's a troll. Don't waste your energy
MoS|BvS|SS|WW|JL-1|Flash|AM|Shazam|JL-2|Cyborg|GLC
Answer = The Martha incest angle
Natasha/Hulk, it was a complete waster of time and came outta no where, and most likely won't even be touched again
At least Joker/Harley is going to continue
MoS|BvS|SS|WW|JL-1|Flash|AM|Shazam|JL-2|Cyborg|GLC
Natasha/Hulk, it was a complete waster of time and came outta no where, and most likely won't even be touched againTony Stark mentions it in Civil War.