I'm glad you loved it. I gave it a five so 4.9 seems right on.
This film has serious problems in logic, story and elsewhere.
[spoilers]He dumps his gun in a trash can somewhere in Madrid, not right next to the embassy. Then Carrack takes him for a ride and when he flees, he's within blocks of that specific trash can and the gun is still there. Alright, they don't empty public trash cans that often, but right there, within two blocks of where he flees her car?
Cauterizing a bullet wound with a super-heated spoon? That's quite a stretch.
No one sees the only sailboat anchored off a beach sailing away after it's taken over by people who come up on it on fast boats, while people are swimming from the beach?
Israeli secret agents corrupting the entire police force of a small community in Spain? Maybe, maybe not. I'll give that one.
No broken bones in the fall he took from that roof using that cable? He's not Superman in this.
Carrack is a graduate of the CIA's training program. She's trained in evasive driving at high speeds. He's some business owner, but he manages to evade her and then pursue her?
Carrack is running an op from the embassy with the help of at least two henchmen and no one but Tom/Martin is aware of what she's doing? Possible, but hard to swallow.
Those are just the first few that come to mind. There were a lot more. [/spoilers]
In my mind, it was a 5. In your mind higher. That you find it better is certainly fair. But it isn't a certainty that the overall public opinion should match yours.
Jules Winnfield: "I'm sorry, did I break your concentration?"
reply
share