About the sky turning dark too quickly during the stock exchange heist is nonsense. Christopher Nolan is a huge fan of On Her Majesty’s Secret Service and the exact same thing happened during the ski chase, so if anything Nolan was clearly paying tribute to one of his favorite films.
Add that to the list of debunked “plot holes”.
That’s the least of this terrible movie’s problems.
shareI still haven’t heard a legit problem with TDKR , I have however heard a bunch of pathetic haters bitch and moan nonstop about the sky turning black too quickly.
shareWhat about problems with the horrible script, writing, directing, acting, pacing, editing, etc.
shareIs that your assumption, or do you know for sure? Either way, claiming that it was a tribute to a cheesy movie is a poor defense for this particular complaint.
And there are many other criticisms that bring this movie down, these two videos sum them up nicely.
Honest Trailers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQJuGeqdbn4
Pitch Meeting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqANAGsywIc
It’s blatantly obvious because the exact same thing happened in OHMSS, and Nolan has said he’s a huge fan of OHMSS and he references a James Bond movie is just about every one of his films.
Citing Pitch Meeting and Honest Trailers is redundant because they do the same thing for pretty much every well known movie. Also I have debunked every single complaint that the moronic haters have come up with. You are just trying to hate the movie because you think it’s cool, you obviously have very low self esteem and self worth.
Nolan has said he’s a huge fan of OHMSS and he references a James Bond movie is just about every one of his films.
Citing Pitch Meeting and Honest Trailers is redundant because they do the same thing for pretty much every well known movie.
Also I have debunked every single complaint that the moronic haters have come up with.
You are just trying to hate the movie because you think it’s cool, you obviously have very low self esteem and self worth.
It’s blatantly obvious that he was paying tribute to OHMSS, you being too stupid to realize this is your own damn fault.
Both of them nitpick everything , what they did to TDKR is no different than what they did to Casino Royale, Die Hard, Lord of the Rings, etc. And I have yet to see any legitimate complaint about TDKR, I usually don’t do this but critical and audience opinions clearly indicate it’s a great movie, you are in the minority, kiddo.
I don’t ignore them, I have ripped every single complaint that has been presented to me to shreds. The haters are nothing more than a bunch of bitchy, pathetic troll boys.
Not desperately defending anything, just calling it like it is. I am an objective, impartial observer and I am a great source of actual truth. TDKR is a great film, the problem is there is a very stupid group of haters who are so bitter that they don’t understand it.
I am an objective, impartial observer and I am a great source of actual truth.
I’m sorry the truth hurts, but you’re just a butthurt fanboy hater. You can’t stand it that the movie was successful and is considered to be one of the greatest films of all time yet it didn’t need the Joker and it didn’t need to do the exact same thing as the previous film.
shareWhich is it? Am I a fanboy or a hater? Got any more oxymorons, kiddo?
shareFanboy’s can be haters as well just for other movies, you’re a fanboy but not for TDKR, you wanted TDKR to just be TDK all over again. For TDKR you’re just a butthurt, stupid hater.
EDIT: I also never said you were a fanboy for TDKR, learn how to read numb nuts.
Lol, where did I say I wanted Dark Knight Rises to be just like The Dark Knight?
At this point, I've deduced that you're either an immature kid who can't take criticism, a troll, or autistic. Go ahead and pick one, and have a nice day.
It’s blatantly obvious, you people are like a broken record.
shareMoviechatuser497 is a blind fanboy. He will bend over backwards to defend even the most minor thing about it.
I will tell you his arguments. It will be one of these or a variation of them.
A: Pay attention when watching Batman Begins next time.
B: You don't understand it.
C: it is rated high on IMDb.
D: That is nitpick.
E: I've never heard a legit complaint about it and I've debunked all the complaints.
That last one's gotta be my favorite, love them oxymorons.
shareHow is that any oxymoron? I have heard illegitimate complaints and I’ve debunked them. For example a complaint that I’ve debunked is that Bruce quit because of Rachel, where there are several lines of dialogue that suggest otherwise and I’ve proven that isn’t true. Another one: Alfred would never leave Bruce, well in the comics he did so that debunks that idiotic complaint as well.
shareAlso don’t put too much stock in what moviefanatic505 says, he’s a racist who called Candace Owens an “Uncle Tom”
shareIt's stupid because it's entitled. It's basically saying in order to have an opinion on this film you have to get through me first. Oh he will also create straw man ghost arguments. He will accuse you of thinking Bruce quit because of Rachael dying. It shows he can't defend the movie. I actually like the dark knight rises but I'm not blind to it's flaws.
shareHe's as effective at defending this movie as Millsey72 is at defending the Democrats.
shareYou mistake the word “proof,” which means “test,” for the word “evidence,” which means “fact.” You are a dullard, hence, inconsequential. Begone.
shareProof:
noun
1. The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.
2. The validation of a proposition by application of specified rules, as of induction or deduction, to assumptions, axioms, and sequentially derived conclusions.
3. A statement or argument used in such a validation.
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.
Shouldn't he be paying attention to film continuity instead?
shareSometimes directors intentionally insert continuity errors, like in Wolf Of Wall Street when DiCaprio is on drugs.
This was clearly an homage to OHMSS, anyone who isn’t mentally disabled should understand this.
Then all you have to do is prove it was deliberate.
shareIt’s obvious it was, why don’t you prove it wasn’t?
shareSo obvious, it only took 9 years for exactly 1 person to make this claim.
shareI didn’t feel it was necessary however since apparently the butthurt haters don’t get it I guess I do need to explain this.
share[deleted]
If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes.
Sounds familiar?
lmao yes...because all cinematic homages have demonstrative proof that they are deliberate.
shareThe people claiming that it isn't an homage have the burden of proof to prove it isn't. Right now all signs clearly indicate it was an homage to On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Heck Nolan flat out admitted that the ice level in Inception was an homage to the same film.
share