Why is Alfred Enoch in this? Simple: Diversity. The notion that a Black man would have a seat in high society or the cultural elite of 1930s London is laughable. His inclusion is just another case of woke, forced diversity β anachronistic, unnecessary, and completely out of place. This is the woke rot in full display, distorting every piece of history or culture it latches onto.
shareWhat's really weird about forced diversity in the UK is that it virtually always favours black people, when they're a small minority, at 4%. In contrast, Asians are over 9%, but get far less "representation" than black people. East Asians are basically invisible.
It highlights that wokeness, DEI and all the other "progressive" shit are American imports that have no place in British society. There's no history of black slavery operating in the UK. All the black people who came here willingly migrated. The credulous, ideologically blinkered types in positions of cultural influence in the UK just swallow this crap whole without even thinking about it.
Itβs strange how media representation seems even more ridiculous in the UK. Sure, Hollywood has its problems, but there are still a few exceptions here and there where stories unfold without the obligatory inclusion of Blacks. In the UK, it feels like they force a Black character into every narrative, regardless of how unnatural or absurd it may be. For instance, if someone were to make a film about a room full of KKK members discussing their ideology, you can bet theyβd find a way to insert a Black into that group just to tick the 'inclusivity' box. Itβs utterly ridiculous.
share