MovieChat Forums > The Irishman (2019) Discussion > Does any respected historian believe the...

Does any respected historian believe the mob killed JFK?


It’s fascinating to think that and would make perfect sense but doesn’t seem like there’s any evidence to support it

reply

Discuss

reply

Why would it make perfect sense?

reply

Because they helped get him elected then he turned around and betrayed them?

reply

Because they helped get him elected then he turned around and betrayed them?


Like you said in your OP, there isn't any evidence to support it. That's the problem with most conspiracy theories: lack of supporting evidence.

reply

I thought there was ample evidence to support them helping him win Chicago

reply

That happened. Well documented.

reply

I thought there was ample evidence to support them helping him win Chicago


That there was massive voter fraud in Chicago in 1960, that cost Nixon the election, I don't doubt. But there is little, if any, compelling evidence that the Mafia or any other organized crime groups were involved in the assassination of JFK.

reply

In general, though, it has to be said that the Cosa Nostra has a tendency to whack or off guys, though they very rarely whack them off. So the idea they'd have someone killed, whomever, is not ludicrous in itself.

reply

In general, though, it has to be said that the Cosa Nostra has a tendency to whack or off guys, though they very rarely whack them off. So the idea they'd have someone killed, whomever, is not ludicrous in itself.

Agreed in that the mafia has had people murdered is not a ludicrous idea, but they almost always confine their killling to each other and certain people are off-limits.

Remember Dutch Schultz? He was killed after he wanted to kill Thomas Dewey. When he put this idea to the other gangsters, they said 'no', but he was a hothead and decided to kill Dewey anyway. They put a contract on him and he was killed in New Jersey.

My point is if Schultz was hit when he wanted to go after a mere prosecutor, it stands to reason that JFK was also out of bounds as well.

reply

That's a fair point well made. Going after the POTUS for whatever reason would be a massive undertaking in just getting the other heads to agree.

I'm not even a supporter of the larger conspiracy by the mafia -theory myself, in fact I mostly just wanted to make the whack off joke, which was worthy of posting just by itself :)

So many probably wouldn't be theorizing about the assassination if it weren't for the fact that the 1976-1979 Congressional committee on JFK and MLK murders concluded, as all interested parties already know, that

on the basis of the evidence available to it, that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee was unable to identify the other gunmen or the extent of the conspiracy.


However, as far as the mafia goes, there's also
The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.


which might mean individual families or groups or affiliates had something to do with it? Hoffa was an active collaborator, shall we say, and very anti-JFK, so it's not out of the realm of possibilities that he had something to do with it, and was then punished.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations

reply

Just for the record, I'm not a believer in any of the conspiracy theories concerning JFK. The reason is simple: there is no compelling evidence to support such theories.

Others disagree and that's fne.

reply

I'd be inclined to disbelieve those as well, if it weren't for the Congressional Committee conclusions. It could be as simple as LHO having a few back up gunmen, but we'll never know for sure barring time travel or such.

reply

There's strong evidence that Joe Kennedy, JFK's father, was a mobster himself, and was one of the higher-ups in the Irish mob that ran Boston. There's even stronger evidence that after he "went straight," he collaborated with the Italian mob to get JFK elected, most famously by having them arrange for dead people to vote in Illinois, which tipped a close election in Kennedy's favor. Once elected, JFK did some things, most notably his handling of Cuba andd appointing his brother Robert as Attorney General, that flew in the face of what he'd allegedly promised to do if elected.

The above is the super-short, Cliff Notes, tl;dr version, but the idea is that the Mafia had clear reasons for wanting Kennedy dead, and they had the means to pull it off. That doesn't mean they did, but someone did, for some reason, and "the Mafia did it" is one of the more likely theories.

reply

I thought most historians refuted it as a rumor that Joe Kennedy was a bootlegger?

reply

Take it for what it's worth, but my family came to America from Castellammare, and my relatives were involved in illegal activities in Boston before, during, and after Prohibition. Even into the '60s, when certain members of our family would visit us, the FBI would show up at our door later with questions. Among our family, it was discussed as fact that Joe Kennedy was the head of a rival gang and was deeply enmeshed in criminal activity. He had the sense/good fortune to buy his way into respectability through politics and his association with FDR. Again, I'm just a "person on the internet," so take it as you will.

reply

It obviously wouldn’t surprise me, if it’s widely KNOWN he was shady and corrupt I’m sure there’s plenty we don’t know. An Irish Catholic in 1920s Boston doesn’t get as far as he did as quickly as he did without slitting a few throats.

I’d love to believe it’s true, makes for a fucking awesome story.

reply

The most novel theory I've heard is that Joe DiMaggio used his connections with the mob, specifically with Sam Giancana, to kill JFK in retaliation for killing Marilyn Monroe, whom DiMaggio still loved even after they divorced.

reply

You have a wild imagination.

reply

Don't shoot the messenger.

reply

Maybe the messenger deserves it in this case? You reek of pasta n gravy.....

reply

I'm just relating a theory I've heard. Google it, if you think I'm making it up.

reply

This is all super interesting. I didn't realize there was such bad blood between DiMaggio and the Kennedy's. I'm not convinced DiMaggio had anything to do with the murder, but it does look like he suspected the Kennedy's of knocking off Marilyn Monroe. So the motive was there at least. https://www.scotsman.com/news/world/joe-dimaggio-died-convinced-jfk-had-monroe-killed-1-545640

reply

100 Bullets dedicated an issue to the conspiracy, when Agent Graves visits an aging Joe DiMaggio and offers him one of his "magic" guns. That's actually the first place I encountered this rather offbeat theory.

https://chasemagnett.wordpress.com/2014/07/14/12th-level-intellect-100-bullets-27-wheels-within-wheels/

As an aside, 100 Bullets is my favorite comic book of all time. If you've not read it, give it a try. It built slowly and majestically over its 100 issue run, and a new issue was one of the highlights of the month for me back when it was still around.

reply

Looks very interesting. Thanks for the info. I'm not a big comic book reader but I may have to dig in.

reply

Joe was morally twisted for sure. He liked to sexually seduce off-the-boat Irish servants. Then torment them by repeatedly telling them they were going to hell for their sin.

reply

[deleted]

That 'arrange for dead people to vote' peaked my interest because the right used that excuse in the 2016 election. So it is possible to get supposedly 'dead people' votes in somehow...

reply

It's widely believed that voter fraud, including votes cast by dead people, flipped Texas and Illinois in favor of JFK. Had Nixon won those two states, he'd have won the election. I'm convinced that was the case based on what I've read, but there's no definitive proof.

The Great McGinty, which is one of my favorite films, made by my favorite director in 1940, starts with a hobo being offered $2 to vote in the mayoral election using the name of a recently deceased voter, so clearly the idea of such fraud long predates the 1960 election.

reply

>>using the name of a recently deceased voter, so clearly the idea of such fraud long predates the 1960 election.

Oh, way before. Read up on the presumed fate of Edgar Allan Poe.

reply

Joe Kernnedy was a financer of movies, a great way to money launder back then.

reply

Dorothy Kilgallen, whom Heminway called the greatest woman journalist, investigated and claimed she had the facts on JFK's assassination. Then she was mysteriously killed and her files disappeared.. She was a client/friend of my aunt's. So was Jacquie Kennedy. Jacquie had he own theory of who was behind the assassination, she had good reason to believe what she did.

reply

There is enough noise out there that it is difficult to determine. The "Mob" certainly had the motive, and the means and the opportunity. The media, fake or not, has for the last 10 years or so, maybe more, really been pressing the lone gunman theory with all kinds of scientific tests to the point ... I really do not know what to think. I cannot think that one nut with all this nefarious and evil connections decided to and pulled it off alone.

Also ... there was a recent something that I saw or read that talked about how the bullet that hit Kennedy in the head fragmented, and theory was it was not the same kind of bullet as the others fired at him because it really blew his head apart more than a solid bullet would.

That should have been a wakeup call for Americans to demand their country clean itself up, but even then America was too corrupt to bring justice to this situation, and if there is the threat that someone out there is going to shoot you, like Kennedy, I doubt any politician would ever legislate or vote for that. American politicians, aside from Warren and Bernie are not generally known for their courage.

reply

pretty obvious that Oswald was a patsy. said so himself.

reply

no

reply

The mob didn't kill JFK. The CIA did. The mob may have helped given the information about the Castro assassination attempts, but the CIA ultimately was responsible.

reply

Actually the film implies this very subtly by including Howard E. Hunt as an intelligence asset who seems to wrapped up in the whole thing. Many JFK conspiracies surround him.

But I agree with you that it was a total inside job. The driver slowed down for the shooting.

reply

This might be a stretch, but I've read a lot about clay Shaw's associates around the time of the assassination and it appears he knew many interesting figures. Especially intelligence people involved with the profumo scandal.

reply

Don't forget LBJ who also profited. I didn't see the movie. Just reading comments.

reply

I would never base my conclusions of the JFK assassination on this movie. One reason to think there was a conspiracy is how much noise has been generated from all these different sources.

reply

I am reading a lot of goofy theories but I noticed not poster gave the name of a respected historian 😄

reply

I am reading a lot of goofy theories but I noticed not poster gave the name of a respected historian 😄


Good point.

reply

The JFK assassinations is the most investigated crime ever. The scientific and forensic evidence proves Oswald was the lone gun man. As the technology improves the evidence becomes stronger. No evidence of the mod/CIA/etc

reply

When you make a movie about something, it cheapens it and makes it kind of stupid to put stuff like that into it. It is a pointless cheap shot, in a movie that is stupid, pointless and cheap.

reply

Hm that’s why it has received widespread acclaim from professional critics

reply

Nice to know what people who need to be told what to think believe, but then we already know.

reply

I can see for myself it is a masterpiece I’m just letting you know you’re in the minority and it’s obviously not a crap film

reply

I thought it was pretty crap.

reply

Haven't you heard?
In this day and age, opinion = concrete/verifiable fact.

Brux says that the movie is stupid, pointless and cheap. Therefore the movie is quite obviously stupid, pointless and cheap.

I also thought it was pretty good. Not the "best movie ever" like some people believe, but a good film.
I'm obviously incorrect in my assessment though, because Brux said it isn't.

/sarcasm.

reply

Yeah haha

reply

I'm sure there is at least one book from a so called expert who proclaims that the mob were behind it.

reply

Tell us which book that is

reply

I just read something about Martin Luther King...

I read a few years ago that Jackie Kennedy said her husband told her MLK was a very bad person, etc. That was a mystery.

Then, a letter was published and it was reported to be from the FBI, that was sent to MLK. It said that they knew all about his evil and perversion and he should kill himself.

Just the over day I read an article in the Guardian that MLK was bugged everywhere by the FBI. In June, a bunch of documents from the agents bugging him was released. They detailed that MLK was involved in a rape in his hotel room, he had orgies, and said he was a communist and not a religious person.

The full documents about him with recordings will be released 2027 and I hope I'm alive.

After reading all of that, I strongly believe the FBI had him killed because he wouldn't stop as they asked him to. They mailed him a letter telling him to kill himself, so the next step is to kill him.

JFK was similar. His family were criminals, he took a lot of drugs, and was a person with no morals when it came to sex. In addition, he may have had other things going on we don't know about, and he was killed in a similar way to King.

Typically, I don't believe this stuff, but after reading the MLK documents, I can completely understand it.

reply

What Kennedys were criminals?

reply

There families were basically drug dealers who made a lot of money on illegal alcohol. They were in with mobsters and were mobsters and then went legit after getting enough money.

It's easy to read about.

reply

There is actually no verifiable evidence to support that Joe was a rum runner, all Kennedy experts and historians have been unable to find any proof of this other than rumor.

reply

You googled that for two seconds.

Firstly, successful criminals do not have evidence tying them to making a career out of crime. So, he's not going to put a sign on his house saying "This house was built by drug money" because that's not smart.

He was tied to organized crime and lots of people knew what he was doing.

There's recent evidence about Martin Luther King that is horrible. It's from the FBI but that info is hard to find and probably most people wouldn't believe it. But it comes from bugging his dwellings. Tricky people don't say they're selling drugs, raping people, etc.

reply

You don’t think 100 years later after everyone is dead the facts would come out? Nothing is really secret anymore, everyone knows Joe was a dirtbag and shady businessman so why would this be a surprise?

reply

Have you ever done anything illegal?

Are there facts?

Drugs are dealt by probably millions of people and there's no records, so who knows?

reply

It's difficult to understand now, with MLK having a national holiday and everything, but in the years leading up to his assassination, a large portion of American society disliked him.

reply