MovieChat Forums > Srpski film (2010) Discussion > The filmmakers should be arrested

The filmmakers should be arrested

posted 11 years ago by mstrainjr
40 replies | jump to latest

This is not art at all. This is the sick fantasy of a group of deranged people, the same ones who made this film. I understood going into this that there was going to be some twisted stuff in here, but I didn't think it would be as bad as it was.

I cannot un-see what I've seen. A newborn baby getting raped as it screams in pain, the pressure to have sex with an underage girl, the main character raping his own son... Oh my god, why was this movie made?

I wish I could sue for the awful images put into my brain. The ending scenes especially had me horrified to the point that I had to turn it off. I feel as if I've been assaulted by the makers of this film. The people behind this should be locked up for this disgusting abomination against art, against sex, and against humanity.

[–] Corpus_Vile 11 years ago

Arrest someone for making a fictitious film? I CALL TROLL!!!

Or else you're simply really illogical.

"Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!"

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Shaza123 11 years ago

How so? How do you know pedos are getting off on this? This movie had high themes of sexual violence. Rape is never about sex, it's always about power. Seems to me, that pedohpiles are far more likely to be getting off on movies like Oliver, and Annie.

I find the idea of hanging someone for making a fictional movie, far more disturbing, then someone making a movie that has themes of sexual violence.

"He's not the Messiah. He's a very naughty boy!"

[–] grrrdevin 11 years ago

Rape is never about sex, it's always about power.

Except, you know, it's totally about sex. That's kind of the whole definition of rape.

"I've been living on toxic waste for years, and I'm fine. Just ask my other heads!"

[–] Strazdamonas 10 years ago

Looks like somone hasnt done its research. Rape is about domination, about showing you are more powerful than another. Sex is only the venue of this domination.

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

[–] Galley_WormFilledSkull 10 years ago

How so? How do you know pedos are getting off on this? This movie had high themes of sexual violence. Rape is never about sex, it's always about power. Seems to me, that pedohpiles are far more likely to be getting off on movies like Oliver, and Annie.

I find the idea of hanging someone for making a fictional movie, far more disturbing, then someone making a movie that has themes of sexual violence.

You took the words off my mouth. Couldn't agree more. The very idea of censoring and hanging filmmakers is, in one word: FASCISTIC.
Moreover, the baby rape scene is not even realistic, the director didn't even try to make it look real. It didn't shock me as I was VERY aware that it was all fiction. Reality is much worse.

'What goes around comes around. Just like a kangaroo.'

[–] dargorrof 9 years ago

Actually I wouldn't even mind if pedos fapped to this instead of actual child porn. You know, considering this is fake *beep*

[–] Corpus_Vile 11 years ago

"Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!"

[–] jounicmx 11 years ago

And you know this how?Oh thats right,you just made it up in your head.

[–] dntbreathe 11 years ago

Arresting someone for something fictional? Such logic.

[–] Zombie55 11 years ago

There has already been one arrest made over it. Google Angel Sala - the director of the Spanish film festival!

[–] Circ81 11 years ago

Not actually charged though?

It's better to rest in the warm body of a friend, than in a cold hole in the ground.

[–] Zombie55 11 years ago

But still... although isn't it strange that someone can be arrested over a movie, and if that even can be the case, why not just have it not made in the first place?

[–] Circ81 11 years ago

It's crazy, but it's not the first time. Ruggero Deodato was arrested after Cannibal Holocaust because of one of the death scenes, it seems at the time it looked very real. The actor who played the part had to present himself at court to convince the judge that he was in fact very much alive.

I totally disagree with you that this film should not have been made. It's your right not to watch it, but that doesn't mean others shouldn't be allowed to. Yes it's quite a gritty film with some, shall we say interesting, content, but it's just a film, it's not real.

It's better to rest in the warm body of a friend, than in a cold hole in the ground.

[–] stitchesaresore 10 years ago

A similar situation happened with the 1985 film Guinea Pig 2: Flower of Flesh and Blood. Charlie Sheen actually made this movie more well known by contacting the FBI about the "snuff" film he'd just seen. The FBI and Japanese authorities looked into the film, questioning it's creators multiple times. They actually had to prove in court that it was fake.

[–] bflan78 11 years ago

I think the director or someone got arrested for Cannibal Holocaust. I am only fourteen and I regret watching this movie because of porn and the scene with the baby is just downright sick. I am actually the sickest person my friends know and they curse and stuff(I don't). But my point is I'm not sure if the amount of content put in this movie is right and I see no way in which people are able to enjoy this movie without thinking about quite some serious content present in the movie.

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] basketcasebelial 11 years ago

I was curious to see this then read your post detailing some of what occurs. It's best to be avoided. Thanks for that.

[–] rabksaj 11 years ago

I absolutely agree with you. I truly believe the people who made this movie are pedophiles and are able to get away with weird sick senseless crap like this. Death to all who were involved in creating this evil beyond words can describe this horrifically satanic crap.

[–] fingerst 11 years ago

Death to all who were involved in creating this

Yyyyyeah. That's not sick at all o_O

Just because your truth isn't the true truth, doesn't mean there is no truth, Ruth.

[–] DagNastyEvil 11 years ago

I feel as if I've been assaulted by the makers of this film.

Not being able to separate yourself from a movie: You, my friend, are screwed up if you allowed yourself to enter that world. SMDH at you.

-
Feminism is what happens when morons take Lifetime movies too seriously.

[–] EmilyRoad 11 years ago

I'm with you on this--but your signature is pretty offensive as Lifetime is the very reason that people have no idea what feminism is. Lifetime is to feminism what Barbie dolls are to feminism; a step in the opposite direction.

Unless you're being sarcastic, which is perfectly fine with me.

CIao

[–] oh_no_mrbill 11 years ago

Not being able to separate yourself from a movie: You, my friend, are screwed up if you allowed yourself to enter that world. SMDH at you.

Why do we watch movies except to enter the world of the movie -- or at least to observe that world for 90+ minutes? I don't go to a movie to "separate myself" from the movie. I want to get lost in it! But even if I should separate myself from it, then what's the purpose of watching it? What is it trying to prove?

If it doesn't mean anything, if it's nothing but a collection of sick and twisted fantasies from a writer and a director, why am I watching it? Am I just hoping to see a bunch of disturbing *beep* for no reason -- because then I might as well go to Ogrish or some other gore website. If it means nothing, it is pure torture porn.

[–] Reidimsn 11 years ago

I watched this movie when it released and I thought it was one of the best movies of the genre in terms of quality and storytelling. I didn't find anything in the film shocking, I was surprised, but shocking? I understand that a lot of people have not seen anything shocking in real life, but you having used internet for at least 13 years already, I don't understand how you could find anything in it shocking. You can find thousands of real life shocking videos in the internet within minutes that are worse than anything in this movie.

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Smokey_T 10 years ago

Ahh, but this is a *film*...

And film is not 'Art', it's 'Entertainment'...

And even art should be tasteful, beautiful...

Ugly art cannot be 'Art'...

Only sickos would like ugly 'Art'...

(is their limited thinking...)

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]

[–] BiiaCX 10 years ago

*way to f-king late to post this but alright*

This movie isn't a crime. Obviously. I've seen a lot of snuff films (the most awful was the one with the Dnepropetrovsk's murderers) and I do find this movie rather heavy for a work of fiction.

It didn't really have a point and that's the worst part for me. It's like the writers just sat around in a table thinking of ways to reproduce their masturbatory and sadistic fantasies. The "plot" in this movie is almost non-existent. The mere idea that someone thought "hey let's show in DETAILS the blood dripping down this little boy's a** while his father rapes him! shocking!" and saw nothing wrong with it...I just don't get it. I'm all for showing violence when it serves a purpose in storytelling. It's kind of like complaining that shows such as Dexter or Hannibal show "gore" and "death". But this one was merely shock-purpose and anyone able to come up with these ideas really needs a psychiatric evaluation. 😰

[–] Smokey_T 10 years ago

It's quite ironic that you tolerate gore, or violence in Hollywood films that have absolutely no point to them, as long as the violence serves the narrative purpose, but find gore or violence unacceptable in a film that *does* have a point, but which you missed...!

[–] BiiaCX 10 years ago

?!?! Do you realize the fact that you actually wrote "violence that has no point but serves the narrative purpose"? Are you aware that "serving the narrative purposes" equals "having a point"?? Anyways, yes I suppose I did miss the super profound point of this torture porn.

[–] Smokey_T 10 years ago

You need to engage brain *some*, and try again. I said that the films which were *pointless* featured violence that was only employed to move the narrative along. Which is violence for it's own sake.

A violent Hollywood blockbuster contains violence for its own sake, and to move the narrative along. The violence in of itself *means* nothing.

If you engage with this film at a superficial narrative level, the level at which you probably watch all films, then it *is* absolutely pointless torture porn.

You *can* read it as saying something... beyond and enabled by the representations of torture, sexual sadism (explosions, bullet-time-bullet-impacts etc). The same cannot be said of the Hollywood films that engage in extreme violence in order to entertain.

Did you watch the film or am I wasting my time talking to an ignorant dullard?

[–] dargorrof 9 years ago

So you're alright watching two teens bashing a man's head with a hammer in real life but if it's fiction then the person who came up with it is sick and should be evaluated at least. Yeah, makes perfect sense.