MovieChat Forums > A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas (2011) Discussion > Paula Garces' ass

Paula Garces' ass

posted 13 years ago by JazzSamurai
27 replies | jump to latest

Was that really her, or a body double? That scene was already amazing, but if that was her ... wow.

[–] trigun_78 13 years ago

What didnt make any sense is why she was bottomless... she had her panties on 2 seconds before, and never took them off.

COMA COMA COMA COMA COMA CHAMELEON!

[–] WorldWar1000 12 years ago

she had a strip covering it where you can unstrap it like a bra. they weren't actual panties.

{!_!}
My eyes are watching you

[–] Wicked_Genius 13 years ago

good looking girl, but those stretch marks on her tummy when she took off her robe were disturbing. get those lasered or special creamed away before you do that!

[–] irishfl80 13 years ago

Just to confirm it for anyone still not sure
http://www.mrskin.com/a-very-harold-kumar-3d-christmas-nude-scenes-t48 806.html has it as a body double.

[–] slayintheilluminati 12 years ago

yes because real girls dont have them, real girls also dont take *beep*
good luck in you holloywood fantasy world... you mustve never had a real girls did you?

[–] Jeff0015 12 years ago

that ass is rediculous!

loved the movie by the way. suprised it doesnt get more love here.

[–] mail-924 12 years ago

Paula Garces had children before this was filmed, so probably not. Hers would have looked like a mom's butt.

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]