Hercules was likely a black guy in real life

 You're anachronistically mistranslating ancient words in a modern manner. In pre-modern languages, "light" and "white" were synonymous. In many Asian and African societies today, they still refer to lighter-skinned people among them as "white" to this day, but clearly they're not referring to white Europeans. In this case, Adamantius is a Middle-Eastern Jew, so he's obviously referring to Greeks being lighter-skinned than his own Middle-Eastern Jewish people. "Lighter-skinned" is the correct translation for leukoteroi tên chroan, not "white race".

I believe I would know what my ancestors were saying in their native language that I speak and understand fluently, more so then a none Greek who doesn't even speak Greek nor understand our language. The term used was LEUKOTEROI to describe Greeks, LEUKOI means white in Greek, it holds the same meaning in modem times as it does in ancient times. Adamants' actual quote: 

"leukoteroi tên chroan" 

That translates to "Whiter in Color" in other words, Greeks were white. In fact the term "LEUKOI" to describe ancient Greeks was used by many other ancient sources including the Greeks themselves. You trying to change the meaning of term because it doesn't fit your opinions doesn't change the meaning of the word nor the fact that it was used to describe Greeks as "white".

 The very idea of a "white race" was alien to the ancient mindset. Greeks never once believed they had anything in common with Northern or Western Europeans, but often went to great lengths to differentiate themselves from other Europeans, more so than they did with other Middle-Eastern peoples. For example, the Greeks often disparaged the Celts and Iranian Scythians for being lighter-skinned than themselves, believing their lighter skin made them dumber but braver, while on the other hand they viewed the darker Egyptians as being smarter but cowardly. The Greeks saw themselves as having an ideal medium skin tone, an idea that the Arabs also later used, portraying themselves as the ideal medium skin tone, but slightly reversed (with darker Africans being dumber but braver, and lighter-skinned Persians being smarter but cowardly).

Say the modern political correct liberals trying to promote racism based on color only in modern eras when ancient evidence proves them wrong. Racial difference and superiority based on color were very much part of the ancient world as they are today. Otherwise we wouldn't have ancient Greeks claiming Ethiopians as cowards and Celtics as stupid based upon their skin colors and appearances. That doesn't change the fact that Greeks were Europeans aka whites and this ridiculous attempt in trying to make Greeks less Europeans are humorous beyond belief. For the record Greeks went to great lengths to differentiate themselves from Middle-Eastern people who they called ASIATICS for the record, more so then they did with other Europeans. I can provide you Ptolemy I quote where he is degrading the Asiatic Persians as inferior to Europe if you like. And yes he does see his Hellenic identity as being part of Europe.

 Nowhere do any of your sources suggest there was no mixing, or that there was ever any law in any ancient society preventing miscegenation. This is coming entirely from your own modern anachronistic racialist interpretation of ancient history, not from any actual ancient sources. In pre-modern times, any anti-miscegenation law would be ridiculous, as that would mean most of the migrating men would be left with no brides and be forced to die alone. If Greek men never married Egyptian women, then there wouldn't be much of a Greek population in Egypt to begin with, yet ancient sources suggest they had a very large population by the
time the Romans conquered Egypt. And like I already pointed out before, Roman sources themselves point out that they could not differentiate Egypt's Greeks from native Egyptians by appearance, but only through language and culture, proving that there was a great deal of mixing between Greeks and Egyptians (primarily Greek men and Egyptian women) in Greco-Roman Egypt.

All my sources point to Hellenistic Egypt being ruled like an apartheid state with little to no intermixing between the ruling Greek Elite and lower class Egyptian natives. No Roman sources ever point out that they could not differentiate Egypt's Greeks from native Egyptians by appearance, that is your own personal opinions. 

Again go read Shaws "Gnomos of the Idios Logos". It was a handbook or code of regulations that consisted of a list of legal rulings relevant to the affairs of the institution of the “Private” or “Special Account” (idios logos) in Egypt under Greek and Roman rule. It describes the legal measures taken by the Greek ruling elite to prevent intermixing between Greeks and Egyptians and that also prevented the inheritance of property and citizenship. And like I said Egyptians even those who adapted Greek mannerisms could only rise so far. It was the Greek elite minority who ruled at the top and passed laws prohibiting intermix with the local population.

Like I said before, it's not simply a matter of adopting a Greek name or Greek customs, but a matter of having a Greek
father. Like in nearly all pre-modern paternal tribal cultures, if your father is Greek, then you are automatically Greek, regardless of who your mother is. If someone looks Egyptian, but has a Greek father, then he/she would be accepted as a fellow Greek, even by the upper echelons of Greek society. It was the same for nearly all pre-modern paternal societies, whether it was the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Arabs, Persians, Turks, Mongols, etc.

Eh no you are wrong, they would not because in Hellenistic Egypt the ruling elite Greeks were passing laws that prevented intermixing between Greeks and Egyptians. In Greek law only a FREE Greek was seen as a Greek citizen with all the privilege that title comes with and having native blood of conquered natives who were not free did not equate you as a Greek even if a Greek soldier bonked some native broad. A free Greek required both parents to be Greek. You would know this if you knew the laws of the period we are discussion. Like I told you go read "Gnomos of the Idios Logos".  Only someone who was of Greek blood and FREE
could gain recognition as a Greek. Hence the ruling Greek elites were able to reassert the status quo and standings through such policies over and against any native populations or any intermix populations.

Let me know if you want me to post Ptolemy I quote, he makes his disgust very clear of "half breed mixed" native kids ruling over their Conquerers the Greeks. lol

 You're just contradicting yourself. You just said it yourself that Egyptians were discriminated against and forced to be lower-class citizens. Yet now you're saying most of those Fayyum portraits are native Egyptians, even though the elite class of that city were Greeks. Like I said before, only the wealthy elites could afford to commission paintings of themselves, not lower-class
peasants. Those Fayyyum portraits are not lower-class Egyptian peasants, but members of the elite class who identified themselves as "Greeks". Also, the genetic studies on the mummies show that they have much greater genetic affinity to Egyptians rather than
Greeks or Europeans, not that they have no affinity with Greeks or Europeans. The greater genetic affinity with native Egyptians is obviously because of mixing.

No I did not contradict myself, I've been saying the same thing for several posts already. Those Fayyum mummies were predominantly Egyptians, and there was a large Arab population among them as well given the fact that there were not many Greeks in Fayyum. Fayyum was made up largely of native Egyptians and Arabs. Stop making things up just because the evidence doesn't fit you opinions. Those mummies showed no genetic affinity with Greeks or Europeans because the majority of them were not Greeks nor Europeans. Greeks were largely concentrated in 3 Greek cities in Egypt: Alexandria, Naukratis and Ptolemais Hermiou. In these three Greek cities it was illegal for the members of the Greek elite citizen-body to contact marriages with natives, and the citizens of these cities retained most of their pure Hellenic stock through out the Ptolemaic period. Hence why there is more Greek/European admixture found in Northern Egypt among Egyptians then Southern Egypt, and even today in Alexandria one can find Egyptians of Greek stock who look purely European, case in point Antigone Costanda and Marina Papaelia:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigone_Costanda
http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/NewFashion/MarinaPapaelia2.jpg

Those mummies you keep harping about were not representations of wealthy Greek elites but largely of Coptic Egyptians. That's why they show more similarities with Egyptians then Greeks or Europeans. As I explained to you in numerous other posts those Mummy portraits are of mostly Copts, heck they are even from the Coptic period. Read:

Mummy portraits or Fayum mummy portraits (also Faiyum mummy portraits) is the modern term given to a type of naturalistic
painted portraits on wooden boards attached to mummies from the Coptic period. 

They date to the Roman period, from the late 1st century BCE or the early 1st century CE onwards. It is not clear when their
production ended, but recent research suggests the middle of the 3rd century. They are among the largest groups among the very few survivors of the highly prestigious panel painting tradition of the classical world, which was continued into Byzantine and Western traditions in the post-classical world, including the local tradition of Coptic iconography in Egypt.

Like I said on numerous times, those mummies are mostly of Egyptians. Heck they even look like Copts look today.

 Learn the difference between modern and pre-modern societies. In most pre-modern societies, most migrations were majority male. It's only in modern times where the male-female ratio in most migrations has become more balanced. The only exception in pre-modern times is slavery, where female slaves would be forced to migrate en masse as well as the males, with some pre-modern societies such as the Arabs even preferring foreign female slaves. However, there is no such indication that the
Greeks had any such preference for female slaves like the Arabs later did.

Learn about the historical time periods being discussed without inflecting your own modern ideological views to them. A child of a native conquered female or female slave would never be given citizenship status under Greek law nor seen as Greek because the child wouldn't be Free. I explained this already in my above comments.

Read the papyri of Hellenistic Egypt, many of those Greek soldiers brought their Greek families with them. The documents of the time show many of them, as we know from the legal papyri of the time period, had European wives. In the 3 cities that Greeks were largely concentrated in it was illegal for the Greek eilte citizen-body to contact marriages with natives, and the citizens of these cities retained their pure Hellenic stock through out the Ptolemaic period. 

And I also notice you didn't answer my original question regarding blacks, probably because it doesn't fit whatever opinions you hold and are trying to promote. Again: So are black Africans who moved and started living in Western white countries NOT black any more but become white? Yes or no? 

 As for the Roma "Gypsies", the male Y-DNA is over 1/2 Indian and under 1/2 European, while the female MT-DNA is about 1/3 Indian and 2/3 European. While it might be easy to tell them apart from other Europeans, it's just as easy to tell them apart from Indians as well. Just from appearance it's easy to tell the Roma are mixed.

As I explained to you already your Romani gypsies example is a bad one because Romani rarely ever intermix with Europeans, hence why their genetic markers both maternal and paternal are overwhelmingly South Asian. They typical keep to themselves and have never really integrated into any of the European host countries they migrate to. That's why historically Gypsies have been such easy foreign scapegoats for Europeans to target when things go wrong. 

reply share

add reply

formatting help