At least in 3 they were actually trying. 4 isn't awful, but it mostly just feels like a stale reunion movie.
shareI think its cuz when 3 came out it wasnt really liked compared to 1+2, 4 was many years later and was kind of a return to formula
shareMe too. I prefer part 3 so much more. Mainly because it actually felt like a "Scream" movie. This one had strange lighting, and the cast wasn't as likeable as the other ones. All the cameos in the beginning were also annoying.
shareScream 4 felt like a Scream movie to me, Scream 3 is the one where it missed the mark and was toned down... this wasn't.
shareIt's a little better, but honestly they're both garbage compared to 1, 2 and 5.
shareScream 3 just wasn't very good. It was ok at best.
shareI like 4 way more than 3! The 10 years in between made it feel really special to have Scream back. The killer reveal in 4 was pretty surprising, as opposed to 3, where I didn't really care when I found out.
The one thing Scream 3 has going for it, is that it calls out Hollywood executives for being pieces of crap wayyy before anyone else did. Wes Craven was literally using Weinstein's dollars to make a movie that calls him out! The balls on Wes Craven! R.I.P.!
LOL
shareI'm not a fan of Scream 4, in fact it's the only one I don't own, But it does have one of the best kills of the series - Olivia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZRFyUk64GI&ab_channel=pedrinho7874
Scream 4 had a better idea, but Scream 3 feels more like a Scream movie, despite all its stupidity. I do have a stronger dislike for 3, though, because it was so extremely disappointing at the time. When 4 came out, I just didn't really care anymore.
shareIt lost me with the villain at the end. Horrible.
share