Why did the guys rape and assault Jennifer?
Seems like a basic question, but if you think about it, the answer isn’t simple/obvious. Or rather, it may seem obvious to individuals, but if you compare what people think, I think you’d find people are not in agreement.
Maybe the question can’t be answered since, technically, this didn’t really happen.
But if the assumption is that this could happen, there is probably a reason why.
So what do you think?
To start it off:
You often hear people, coming from a certain perspective, insist that “Rape is really about power [and not sex]”. I agree that rape is sometimes (or often, etc) about power, but I don’t agree with the implication that it is only power and not about sex. In fact, I think consensual sex, too, is very often “about power.”
Interestingly, I think the situation in this film is one where power does play a huge role…though sex does, too. And maybe some other things, too. Further, what sort of “power”? Why is this “power” being asserted?
Your film gods: Lee Van Cleef and Laura Gemser
Chili-P