MovieChat Forums > Zack Snyder's Justice League (2021) Discussion > What is the maximum IQ you can have and ...

What is the maximum IQ you can have and still be able to enjoy this movie?


87?

reply

Nope, that's the IQ required to pose such a question. Have some break before you start to tackle the 88...

reply

Ok, but what IS the maximum IQ you can have to enjoy this movie?

reply

Obviously you don't get it. There is not such a thing like a maximum IQ for enjoying a movie. There is a MINIMUM IQ required to understand a movie.

reply

What is the minimum IQ you need to understand that this movie sucks?

reply

You need a minimum IQ to understand that this does not suck. But I am sure you are working on it. So maybe one day...

reply

Maybe I am off with the IQ thing. It is probably just a question of maturity. What is the maximum mental age you can have to be immature enough to think that a movie with a terrible script, a dumb plot and zero substance is good because it has lots of slo-mo shots and an depressingly dull colour palette?

reply

terrible script, a dumb plot and zero substance

Let's be honest (and mature!): That's something, both - Marvel as well as DC movie adaptations - have in common. Must be the sources, which are probably not written for noble-prize-winners...
Concerning slow motion: Way too much of it you can find in every John Woo film. In contrast to that Snyder is pretty decent.
Color palette: Yes, DC tries to look different than Marvel. I prefer the DC palette, because Marvel in all those CGI action scenes looks a little like a damn Pollock painting in motion.

reply

The ubiquitous "I'm too mature" to enjoy this movie. This question is a certain symptom of an immature mind: a person so concerned that he is all grown up he disparages anything he perceives as too "childish," "young," or "immature" for him.

reply

I don't think the movie is childish. It is just terrible. I am saying you have you have a childlike mind to be able to enjoy it.

reply

The usual response.

de gustibus non disputandem est. Taste is dependent on the person and cannot be disputed. You don't like it. That is your right and your opinion is no better or worse than mine or anyone else's.

People look for different things in entertainment. People who enjoy this film are looking for different things than you are. It doesn't make them wrong or you wrong. However, it is the mark of an adult that you respect the differences among different people.

You can discuss the film, and indicate why you do not enjoy it. However, you should do it in an adult manner. Explain your issue. Give examples. Understand that people will disagree with your interpretation.

I've posted this type of discussion many times, as have other posters. This is far from the first film that has seen a post such as yours. (It isn't even the hundredth post like it.) Ad hominem attacks are not an effective or rational means to advance your position. It is one of the methods for others to dismiss your opinion as irrelevant.

reply

Good luck trying to have a rational discussion with a Snyder fanatic.

reply

I am sometimes a masochist.

reply

I don't know what you need to enjoy it. But you probably need a lot of coffee to keep yourself awake to get through it.

reply

LOL you are such a moron for make that question and the fact you still have not changed the title just show you still dont get what you write wrong

reply

Eleventy-cee

reply

You're the one who thinks Whedon's hack is better than Snyder's restoration, in spite of Zack's having a much higher user rating.

What's your IQ? Moron = 50-69 Imbecile = 30-49 Idiot = 29 & below.

reply

A human rutabaga...

reply