Functioning addict


I get that we are probably supposed to hate Jackie, but I can't help but hate everyone else in her life. She was doing just fine, popping her pills, doing her job, taking care of her family. It's not until other people decide she needs their help that her life goes to *beep* Literally EVERY time someone decides Jackie needs their help, something goes wrong. She was an addict, yes. But she wasn't hurting anyone but herself. Other people should've just left her alone instead of forcing their "help" on her.

Two rules, man: Stay away from my *beep* Percocet and do you have any *beep* Percocet

reply

I get where you're coming from, but Jackie did do a lot of bad things to the people around her. The thing that pops in my mind is using O'Hare's money to buy drugs rather than her daughters education.

With that being said though, people are way to quick to point a judgmental finger at drug users. There are many people who are capable of being functioning drug users without stealing or putting their loved ones in danger. Just because someone uses drugs, it does not mean they need help. Most users are not addicts. But reading these message boards it seems most people don't realize that

reply

You know, I think you're totally right. it seemed like she was totally fine in the beginning. She was using, but she was working and being a good mom and doing what she had to. Then people decided she needed help and I think that made things worse because she now had to find even more ways to hide it and it just snowballed from there.

reply

I have to agree. She was doing fine. Sure she had some problems. Everyone does. But She was clean a week and her life when to sh!t. Living life with everyone watching you like a hawk is way too much pressure. Especially when they are watching and waiting for her to screw up. And accusing her whether she was guilty or not.

reply

I understand where you're coming from. It can be argued that the laws and the social traditions against drug use are the direct cause of the deceptive and illegal behaviors of the addict. It's the same argument that it was Prohibition, not liquor, that caused a decade of American crime.
If Jackie had been a tobacco addict in the days before the leaf was connected to cancer, the only ill result might have been her early death--and maybe some harm to others through second-hand smoke. But if tobacco had been outlawed, her need for it may have forced her into the secrecy, deception, and lies we see her practicing throughout this series.
But there is a real difference in the nature of the substance being abused. The reason, for instance, that liquor became known as dangerous long before cigarettes were suspected is the irrational thinking and behavior it induces. Even though alcohol hasn't been outlawed (another industry "too big to fail"), AA groups and other support organizations sprang up all over the world--for good reason.
Likewise, it is the behavior caused by certain drugs that is exposed in NURSE JACKIE. While it is true that a certain level of drug usage can support periods of high functioning, it is very difficult for those who develop addiction to estimate how much to use and when to draw the line. While it is true that we have historical examples of successful drug users (e.g. Sigmund Freud)--even fictional types (e.g. Sherlock Holmes)-- these are the exceptions not the rule.
Yes, a fair amount of Jackie's wretched behavior is caused by the laws enforcing her secrecy. But the drugs themselves are also responsible for her losing touch with reality (the 800cc mistake!), and that irrationality is the essential reason for all the rules and hospital policy.

reply

I won't agree or disagree with you, but I think your take on this show is pretty interesting and lends itself to great conversation.

reply

Does the end justifies the means? I personally dont believe it does.

You might say that she saved 1000 people over the years and if she would have killed one person in the future, it is still worth it. I feel that if you are an addict but your work is great still doesnt give you a pass.

To be honest the one year through season 5 where she is sober clean - she is at her best, she doesnt do any mistakes, compared to other seasons. She finds love that is filled by love and not by addiction (which is essentially her relationship with Eddie).

reply

I have to ask though, why is it wrong for her to be a addicted to painkillers if she can still do all the things she needs to. Happy home life, performing wonderfully at work, can very much afford her habit. Is it still wrong then? If so, why? It's not hurting other people.

reply

I guess it's because it's not a sustainable habit. She would need increasing dosages of painkillers for the same effect, and that has at least two issues: 1. affordability (can she really afford her habit?) 2. ability to function - at increasing dosages, she would feel the same, but her abilities become increasingly impaired. Plus, it becomes more difficult for her to judge how much to take.

I suppose that being an addict is not just about whether she can sustain the habit, but that her whole life revolves around taking those pills. That is her first priority, and that is hurting other people (especially her daughters).

Just a thought, though. I'm not exactly an expert.

reply

As you mention, whats the harm if she can still properly function. Considering she is having sex with Eddie in order to get the drugs. I cant call that properly functioning and it clearly hurting her husband and her daughters.

The problem with any drug is that your body creates tolerance to it and the normal dosage that you consumed at the beginning ain't working anymore. This leads to higher dosage that starts to affect your performance.

If she could simply buy the pills from a dealer without putting a strain on her finances - there is no problem. Unfortunately the show presented us that she goes to great lengths to get the drugs by lying and cheating. That's a big wrong.

reply

She was doing just fine, popping her pills, doing her job, taking care of her family. It's not until other people decide she needs their help that her life goes to *beep*


Not true. When the pill o matic was installed in the pharmacy, in season 1, and Eddie was let go, Jackie used Zoey's and Thor's access numbers to get her drugs for herself. This was before anyone started helping her.
Also, in season 1, when Jackie tells Zoey to give a dosage of meds to a patient, and the patient almost died. Zoey wrote down exactly what Jackie told her. Jackie, of course, threw Zoey under the bus and said that Zoey misheard Jackie. And Jackie threw Zoey under the bus several more times in season 1. So yes, I would say that Jackie was hurting other people. Zoey and Thor could have lost their nursing license because Jackie used their access numbers. Zoey could have been in serious trouble if they didn't work to save the patient. People were hurt by Jackie. Just Jackie had a really good cover for her mistakes at that time.

reply

She was NOT functional. Her addiction affected every relationship she had, ended her career and her life. Bad mom. Bad wife. Bad employee. Bad person. That is assuredly not functional.

reply

Do you know what a functioning addict is? She had been doing drugs for over 10 years without a single incident and without anyone's knowledge. She doesn't start to fall apart until her source of pills taken away and she has to resort to extreme means.

reply