Will this movie show us how the predator acquired the musket he gave to Danny Glover in Predator 2?
That would be pretty sick for sure.
shareThat would be pretty sick for sure.
shareThe pistol has an inscription reading: "Raphael Adolini 1715".
There was a comic that explained the entire backstory - Raphael Adolini was a pirate and the captain of a pirate galleon who encountered a Predator off of the Guinea Coast, Africa, in 1718.
Sounds like a cool plot, should have used that instead of making this anti-white feminist wank.
Why is it anti-white? What do you have against feminism?
shareIt portrays whites, especially males, as inherently evil.
Modern feminism breeds phoney victimhood, entitlement, and a hatred of males.
None of this crap should be forced into Hollywood entertainment.
It gets released next month. What were you watching? The trailer shows a very brief shot of white men shooting rifles. This was not evil last time I looked.
Feminism is just the idea that women can be the equal of men. There is no need for you to twist it into something else.
Yeah nice try, wokist. Unfortunately your cult has been exposed too many times for your gaslighting to work here.
The invading whites who historically ‘stole’ the land from the natives will of course be portrayed as evil, as per the woke agenda. Why on earth would it be different here? Why on earth would anyone give Hollywood the benefit of any doubt?
Your fake definition of feminism might have applied to one of its early iterations, but doesn’t remotely describe ‘modern feminism’ which was what I raised, as you know full well.
Do you have any more pathetic gaslighting attempts..?
🤢
share☝🏻 Your gaslighting made this guy want to puke, Ranb.
shareI was polite. You decided to be rude because you were making up crap you have no reason to believe it true.
I used an actual definition of feminism. Just because you use you own definition for a word does not mean the rest of us have to be stupid and follow along.
You weren’t polite, you were being a gaslighting prick and I called you on it and, true to form, you’re continuing it here.
Now you’re strawmanning, I didn’t use my ‘own definition’ of feminism, I specifically described ‘modern feminism’ and you’re dishonestly and transparently trying to pretend otherwise.
You’re too dumb to pull off the rhetorical tricks you’re attempting here. I’m banking on your combination of low IQ and oversized ego to ensure that you’ll try again despite your repeat failures. Don’t disappoint now…
So how do you define "feminism" and "modern feminism" then?
You appear to be very threatened by feminism in general. This makes you weak and run for cover under the banner of "I've been gaslighted". How in the hell does being challenged on your weak attack on feminism make you question your own reality?
You are weak and your arguments will fail to stand up to the slightest scrutiny.
Feminism was about equal rights for women. Once we achieved that, the activists had nothing to complain about so they turned radical, hating on men, trying to undermine and humiliate them, portray masculinity as ‘toxic’, and joined the ‘intersectional’ Left in trying to destroy the nuclear family and tear down western civilisation.
I’m not ‘threatened by feminism’ because I know what modern third wave feminists are up to, but many poor fools like yourself are seduced by the ideology, and many women will only realise they were duped after their ovaries have long dried up.
You’re a blind, stupid, obnoxious NPC regurgitating the woke propaganda that has fucked your head, and you’re too stupid to realise that the people who made you believe all this shit hate you 🤦🏻♂️
When was equal rights for women obtained?
I think you're scared to death of a woman who will not get on her knees for you.
What is this "shit" you're talking about.
When was equal rights for women obtained?
I think you're scared to death of a woman who will not get on her knees for you.
What is this "shit" you're talking about.
Women do not have the same rights as men as people are allowed to discriminate against women just for being women.
I still think you're scared of real women who won't take your crap.
Calling my assertions BS does not mean anything coming from you.
1. Wrong, women have the same rights as men. If you think they don’t then name a right that men have that women don’t.
2. No you don’t, you’re just trying to pathologise dissent (and it isn’t working because you’re not bright enough to convince anyone).
3. I’m not ‘calling’ your assertions BS, I’m accurately describing them as such. Examine them and you’ll see.
A man can get a prescription drug that women cannot anymore. Have you read about the new restrictions wherein pharmacies are refusing to prescribe certain drugs to women because they can be combined with other drugs to induce an abortion? Doesn't matter if the woman is not pregnant, they're out of luck just because they're a woman.
shareI’m still waiting for you to give an example of a right that men have that women don’t. Come on…
shareYou mean that thing that has happened ONCE?
That's not exactly proving women can't get the drug. That's an example of a pharmacist using an existing law to refuse filling a prescription. They can refuse to fill ANY prescription if they don't feel comfortable doing it for any reason. The fact you have to pick one time this has happened to one person, and are inflating it to represent a new law, shows how desperate you are.
Answer the question. What right's are women being refused outright, that men are allowed.
lol! you conservatives are such snowflakes. get over it, it's literally a fucking movie.
shareI’m not a ‘conservative’, dickhead. You wokists really want to silence this discussion because it’s calling out your cult, but annoyingly for you Moviechat respects Free Speech. Oh well.
sharelol! "free speech" for conservatives is codeword for "sexist and racist". to you guys, free speech means "why cant i say the n word? it's just a word!" free speech for liberals mean everyone has a chance to be free and equal, including minorities and women, which im sure greatly upsets you.
if anything, you're upset at my freedom of speech, clearly as I got you all riled up. calm down, big man. i thought you alpha males dont get offended?
lol! "free speech" for conservatives is codeword for "sexist and racist". to you guys, free speech means "why cant i say the n word? it's just a word!"
free speech for liberals mean everyone has a chance to be free and equal, including minorities and women, which im sure greatly upsets you.
if anything, you're upset at my freedom of speech, clearly as I got you all riled up. calm down, big man. i thought you alpha males dont get offended?
you're definitely conservative. i know you think you're some sort of unique centrist, but you're definitely a conservative.
our definitions of freedom of speech are pretty much the exact same. did they teach you to read in the barn you were raised in?
and no, it's not a projection. i'm quite happy in my skin. are you? you seem very angry and insecure.
[deleted]
Be careful. You might drown in all those white tears. 😭
shareRacist prick.
shareProject much? It's time for you MAGAts to get a new playbook.
shareThe racism is coming solely from you, and your dumbass diversion to ‘MAGAts’ reveals low IQ and basic bitch tribalistic thinking. So again - racist prick.
share📽📽📽📽😆
shareSpewing emojis - the recourse of the humiliated loser with nothing of substance to say. Cringe.
shareLooking at the threading of this conversation, it was YOU who brought up race, since you replied to JakeSwitch's comment about the gun's origin. This means you ARE the racist in this particular instance.
shareYou may want to repost your reply to Drooch specifically. I believe that's who's racism you intended to point out.
I mean it's amazing they try to deny it when it's in black and white.
His thread is in reply to JakeSwitch, who said nothing of race in his post.
That is WHY I posted to his comment. And yes, it's in 'black and white', so we can all see that's who he posted his reply was to.
Not to belabor the point but you actually replied to me. Look at the nest. Plus I received a reply notification.
shareYes, I just noticed it was you I replied to, and thought you were someone else trying to correct me.
What I see is that your "White tears" comment and Drooch's first comment are both on the same colour thread band. This indicates to me that they are the same level. Meaning your comment was in reply to Jake, thus the first mention of skin colour in 'this' thread is your comment.
That said, it does look indented. For comparison, look under RanB's first comment. I see two replies to him in the same colour band, but without an indent.
Just to be clear, anyone who argues any point on race is clearly in the wrong. Including you.
That take is laughable. Calling out racist sentiments is never wrong. Attempting to neuter anti-racists is wrong and a conservative tactic and flaw possessed by many milquetoast liberals. Do better, better yet be better.
shareYou're a racist prick and "anti-racism" is code for "anti white"
shareSpoken like a true bigot. Need a tissue for your white tears.
shareCalling out racist sentiments is never wrong, you fucking racist prick.
shareProject much? Your gaslight is getting dimmer and dimmer.
Good luck with the "I know you are, but what am I?" schitck.
Don't you have a kids drag show you should be attending you fucking degenerate racist prick?
shareKids in drag?
Are you still waiting for JFK Jr. to join Cheetolini's ticket?
White supremacy has really rotted your brain. I've always wondered how shitheads keep the white hoods clean. Any idea?
They would have somehow found a way to inject that shit into it anyway.
shareDon't care. Would settle for an actual decent attempt at a good film which this franchise badly needs.
shareThis is probably the best view. Nobody should care about the content, as long as it's a good film.
I'm not holding my breath, though...
This movie was in the better tier for the franchise
shareI think that's pretty obvious.
shareNot exactly
The musket makes an appearance, complete with engraving so there’s no doubt it’s the same weapo , but doesn’t wind up with a predator.
Maybe the "Lost Hunters" collected it from Naru's tribe along with their buddy's head.
This is the very defintion of member berries. Remember the pistol. Where here it is without any rhyme or reason why its there.
So the main question now is. How did the Predator give it to Harrigan. Tehy just created a plot hole.
As the drinker said. Did the Predators come full force afterwards and wipe them out and take it.
If you watch the beginning of the end credits, the ones where primitive paintings are in the background, you'll see that the very last primitive painting shows ships descending out of the sky towards the native american village.
What I'm guessing is that the other Predators came to reclaim their fallen comrade's head and to make sure none of their tech remained in human hands. I don't think they'd wipe out the tribe. Rather I think they'd want to honor the one who killed their comrade as a great hunter. My guess is that she gave the pistol to them in some sort of ceremony honoring her, or they requested something of hers to take back to their home planet and she gave them the pistol.
I called it fellas!
shareNope. You'll have to wait for the sequel for that.
share