What a BRILLIANT ending !!! (spoilerish) - Spread (2009) Discussion

[–] j_captain 15 years ago

Wasn't it awesome how that damn tail was bugging the frog?

reply

[–] luiza_giacchino 15 years ago

Hey, I wanted to see if something else happened in the end, but the cinema guy kicked me out.

So, was it just the frog and the tail until the very end?

reply

[–] dimagic 15 years ago

yes. the frog swallows the tail too by the end of the credits, and then it ends.

good movie, i think many people just can't take kutcher seriously, judging him by his public persona. maybe they feel some sort of hypocrisy in him, so they don't like the film because of it. i think it's a mistake, the film is very well made, it's about something serious and important, and has no happy ending which is brave decision for such movie. it maybe didn't earn hundreds of millions of dollars, like that other terrible movie with diaz, but it's way better and meaningful.

reply

[–] addison 15 years ago

It was a nice metaphor for the whole movie.
The frog (the powerful people in L.A.) eating the mouse (the Nikkis and Heathers).

reply

[–] dimagic 15 years ago

It was a nice metaphor for the whole movie.
The frog (the powerful people in L.A.) eating the mouse (the Nikkis and Heathers).

Sometimes the frog is just a frog. I think it's better than cliche and over-stretched metaphors.

reply

[–] blueharvest16 15 years ago

It was a metaphor that Nick was a frog in a world where women kiss a lot of frogs before they meet their prince. Nick was realizing his destiny that he was no woman's prince and was the frog in so many womens' lives

reply

[–] T_Man 15 years ago

i thought it was to show that ashton had changed by the end of the movie and instead of other people feeding and taking care of him, he was finally feeding and taking care of something.

reply

[–] holmswede 15 years ago

Bingo, to T_Man!

And I'd add, that even the frog had a hard time swallowing it, but was able to after some struggle.

reply

[–] Tanchalum 15 years ago

dimagic, you're doing the same thing you claim you don't want other's doing. that 'terrible' movie with Diaz aka 'what happens in vegas' isn't a terrible movie at all. It's one of my favorite comedies of the last several years. My sis and I watch it everytime we run across it on HBO. And it's on HBO a lot.

I liked this movie a lot too but finally became kind of board or thought I knew were it was going so I bailed. Might have to finish it some time.

reply

[–] biskvito 15 years ago

sometimes the frog opens his mouth, eventually he finishes his meal and puts on a satisfaction face

reply

[–] porfle 15 years ago

"Hey, I wanted to see if something else happened in the end, but the cinema guy kicked me out."

The closing credits are part of the movie that you paid to see. You're entitled to sit there and watch it until the screen goes blank!

bumscorner.com
myspace.com/porfle
hkfilmnews.blogspot.com

reply

[–] raythorne2005 15 years ago

it probably wasnt the cinema guy, probably it was because he pirated the movie and they cut out the credits (they do that to make the movie smaller)

reply

[–] MinaBabaei 15 years ago

wtf? Why would you think that, that doesn't make any sense at all?!

reply

[–] trixx_72 15 years ago

does anyone know the specific breed of the frog?

thanks

reply

[–] ddiago 15 years ago

Was the frog CGI?

reply

[–] Apolyon 15 years ago

Per Ashton's commentary the frog was real and it was an African Bullfrog. Also he said it had to do with the whole "kissing a lot of frogs to find a prince" thing.
He also said take your own metaphor and drop it in here and the answer is yes.

reply

[–] ivanhoe1-1 15 years ago

Absolutely briljant. I think it was a toad btw. Never ever looked the credits always through with so much interest :-). Just waiting when will the tail go in and guess wat it was about when the catering was credited. Briljant part of Hubba untill the verry end with his satisfacturing burps.
Not a verry entertainig movie for the first half to me but I must say Ashton Kutcher looks like a verry good actor.

reply

[–] monty39 15 years ago

FROGS EAT MICE?! Jesus, I'm going to have nightmares tonight...

reply

[–] goldplateddog 15 years ago

Depends on the species. Since bullfrogs are large, they're likely to eat large prey, including rodents, snakes, birds, and other frogs.

Smaller frogs like types of tree frogs, usually eat things like crickets and moths.

reply

[–] tb-balla 15 years ago

What an ugly frog, i totally dissed that part!

reply

[–] digiscript34 15 years ago

Well, buggers, I had to stay to the end just to get to the truly educational part... ribbitt! I think that scene was transplanted from an IMAX I recently saw at the science museum.

reply

[–] bellapeligrosa 15 years ago

He was a bullfrog. His name was Jeremiah. He was a good friend of mine. He didn't listen to a damn word I said though.

:)

It's too cerebral! We're trying to make a movie here, not a film!

reply

[–] shellyduck 15 years ago

Hated the ending. I am horified of frogs and insanly scared of mice so the 2 together sheesh....could have went my whole life without seeing that.

reply

[–] gjw 15 years ago

Actually, I think it would have been better to have ended the movie when he's leaving Samantha's house for the last time, after he had delivered the groceries.

reply

[–] tramlaw301 15 years ago

It would've been cooler if it were a snake.

~~~~
I'm the Most Special.

reply

[–] PussyCrusher_Principal 15 years ago

yeah, but, see, then the metaphor (which blueharvest nailed correctly BTW) wouldn't have meant anything...y'see, there was foreshadowing halfway through the film, when he "apologized" to the frog when he "insulted" it but by the end he realizes that in a world divided into frogs and princes, he's a frog...see? No snakes. Frogs. And princes. Princes. Frogs. No snakes. Get it?

Ahh, what's the point?

reply

[–] mrcheekychappy 15 years ago

All these metaphors with the frog you lot suggested are cool, but i think its just a simple idea that he has changed ! As he was making fun of his only friend who owned pet frogs (half way through the movie) ! wala

reply

[–] SaoWhit 15 years ago

The ending made this movie good, I hate frogs..like HATE them, but i understood what it all meant, loved it.

Oh Nooooos..... www.myspace.com/saowhit

reply

[–] mailejs 14 years ago

In my humble opinion, the ending is brillant in several different respects: first, it accurately distills the theme(s) of the movie with a rather simple but visually compelling metapor (no matter how offensive or disgusting it may seem to some; obviously, life isn't often pretty). Read into it whatever one might regarding the message, it is hard to take one's eyes off the scene until the end. Second, I believe that the prior posts suggest several different and valid interpretations: that's good - movies should offer at least a little something to think about, dispute, and discuss. Third, the ending clearly bucks the typical fairy tale ending - and that can be hard to swallow...

reply

[–] Calinks 14 years ago

The frog is my uncle. It was his first major role and he loved doing it. The director told him that he was one of them most important characters in the film, funny thing is, my uncle said he almost choked on that mouse but thankfully everything went off without a hitch.

"Cool will get ya dead." -Former NBA Power Forward, Karl Malone

reply

[–] Joel_S 14 years ago

Are we being serious or saracastic in this thread? I honestly can't tell. I don't know much about filmmaking, but the frog ending seemed unbelievably lazy, like something tacked on at the end by an 8th grader trying to finish a report.

reply

[–] harveyblunts 14 years ago

shoulda ended like 1 minute earlier, with the gate closing and a full screen of metal bars.

reply