Why did this movie get BETTER reviews than An Unexpected Journey?
I can't figure out why the first Hobbit film got so much negative response when it was released, but then the second one came out a year later and numerous professional critics and fans on the internet were saying it was "much better" and an "improvement" over the first one.
Those who hated AUJ mainly ranted about the useless filler to pad the story, the long running time, and how the IMAX version with the higher frame rate hurt their eyes (I didn't see the movie in the higher frame rate, so this was a non-issue to me. Sorry they picked the wrong theater but that's no reason to bash the film itself). Yet DoS had the same issues as the first film, and they gave it a pass this time around.
I always thought AUJ was the best of The Hobbit trilogy. It had a sense of lightheartedness and fun that the latter two lacked, and I loved the "Misty Mountains" song (which was sorely missing from the second and third films). I didn't watch DoS until it came out on DVD, and I found it to be the weakest of the trilogy -- it suffered from "middle chapter" syndrome because it didn't resolve anything and went on forever, and I found most of the "filler material" in the second one was far less interesting than the "filler material" in the first one. AUJ had some great iconic scenes, like the Dwarfs arriving at Bilbo's home, the Misty Mountains song, Riddles in the Dark, Bilbo being captured by the three trolls who try to roast him alive until Gandalf turns them into stone, etc. Pretty much the only parts of DoS that were worth watching was when Smaug FINALLY showed up. And even that part, as cool as it was, had an underwhelming "conclusion" because Peter Jackson decided to leave it on a cliffhanger for the third movie.
Looking at the RT scores, AUJ got 64% fresh whereas DoS got a 74% fresh.
For those who prefer the second film over the first one, WHAT exactly do you like BETTER? It contains all the SAME flaws that you mercilessly bashed the first movie for, and a far less compelling set of events.
I don't get it.