McAdams ruined this.


It was like watching her doing an impression of Jennifer Garner doing an impression of Meg Ryan. The movie was funny, the whole supporting cast was delightful. She single handidly tanked it. I've never seen such an annoying unlikeable performance.

"I said no camels, that's five camels, can't you count?"

reply

She did a great job - maybe a bit over the top, but she wasn't terrible. And let's face it - Rachel McAdams was likely cast more as eye candy than anything else.

reply

No. I have to disagree with the OP. I thought Mcadams was cute and adorable and sincere in this role. Sure it may not be to your liking, but Mcadams gave the performance her "all" and I thought she shined wonderfully. Plucky.

reply

I disagree with the OP...Rachel acted well in this. I actually was quite surprised she could be as funny as she was in the film. The role requires her to be hyperactive...so I guess that's why there r some ppl who find her a bit annoying in this role. But for me....a job well done, rachel!

reply

LOL she was awful, or maybe it was her character. But eitherway the performance stunk like french cheese.

reply

Rachel was great in this...She was working with what she was given, which in my opinion, wasn't much.

The problem with Rachel's character is that we never really know why she is overcompensating and being so hyperactive. Her dad is mentioned a few times but that really doesn't make sense in the larger context. Maybe it's her age? I couldn't figure out why she tried so hard. Usually people who do that have larger issues.

I guess the annoying part of Rachel's character is that I couldn't understand her dream of wanting to be producer of the Today show. What kid wants to grow up to be a producer? Not very many. If she wanted to be an anchorwoman, or a stylist, or even the set designer, then maybe I would get it.

This movie could be more interesting, as I thought at one point Harrison Ford's character would for sure commit suicide. That being said, the movie worked because of the wonderful chemistry. I felt the connections between these characters and that made me invested in the story. Loved the scene when Harrison made frittatas!

reply

While I thought this movie was decent and Rachel McAdams was just fine - she ABSOLUTELY was playing a DEAD-ON Jennifer Garner...there were times in the movie I forgot who was playing character...

reply

I think it was the character you guys were having issues with. She was socially inept but was also a workaholic. This would make her character when trying to have a relationship with her very challenging. But what I liked about it is that Patrick Wilson's character understood she was a workaholic and was willing to work with it. The relationship in the movie is what someone else said it was. It was a way for Rachel to find out more and more about Ford's character. She was a workaholic so everything had to do with work even a relationship. She didn't know how to put work on hold and Patrick's character actually helped her with that by taking her phone away from her. As much as it was weird for Rachel's character in the long run she actually appreciated it.

I also believe the reason she tried so hard had a lot to do with her mother's little speech after she got fired. I thought "What a bitch." It wasn't that her parents didn't want her to do that job, it was that they didn't believe she could do it. I believe that is what drove Rachel's character to give it her all.

Also she was a woman of her word and that can frustrate a lot of people actually. People say they want a fully honest person that keeps every promise but I believe in reality they don't. It becomes boring in a sense. There is no spontaneity. People like that too.

She gained respect from her workers when she fired the pervert or whatever he was because it was something I guess no one else had actually had the balls to do and he wasn't helping Daybreak any. She was under an enormous amount of pressure and didn't want to be unemployed again, especially with this economy. So she gave it her all and fixed things that needed fixing and did whatever she had to do to make it happen. If it meant firing people, she did it. If it meant putting people in their place, she did it. If it meant changing things up a bit she did it.

Overall, I loved her performance and thought she did shine here. I also preferred Wilson's, Keaton's and Ford's performance as well. Ford's grumpiness and sense of obligated respect was hilarious when you look at his socks. That was funny. I was thinking, you expect me to take you so seriously and bow down to you but then you wear those socks with that suit. Uh no. You need to be put in your place and Rachel put him in his place. Favorite scene where I thought Rachel really shined was when it was her first day on the job and everyone was throwing everything at her and it looked like she was fumbled and didn't catch what everyone said and then you realize she did and the delivery was awesome.

reply


gtfo, she was the best part of the movie.


When there's no more room in hell, The dead will walk the earth...

reply



I love her!


reply

She was great like always.

reply

Seriously? Do people not understand that actors are playing a part? She was supposed be upbeat and quirky. She was playing the part and did it very well. Any other actress would have been told to act the same way!

reply

I totally 100% completely disagree with you. She was awsome as always. I love her movies. And that smile its beautifull.

reply