MovieChat Forums > Water for Elephants (2011) Discussion > The Positive Rob Pattinson Reviews

The Positive Rob Pattinson Reviews


As far as I can tell, Rob seems to have gotten around 70% or more positive reviews for this movie. People keep posting negative rhetoric so I thought I'd start a thread to just compile the positive stuff. The movie currently stands at 60% Fresh on RT and 77% from the Broadcast Film Critics Association but Rob got quite a bit more positives than that. Most negative reviews seem hung up on Edward Cullen which says more about the reviewer than Rob's capabilities, in my opinion. Stole a couple of these from moviejunkie on Rob's board and I'll add more as the days go by.

CNN
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/21/water.for.elephants.r eview/index.html?hpt=Sbin

As for Pattinson, this slender, smoldering 24-year-old is destined to be patronized by the critics and probably a good part of the male population for a while, but he looks like the real deal to me. He has the bone structure, but he also has a sensitivity and seriousness that should stand him in good stead.


Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/gog/movies/water-for-elephants,1169505/c ritic-review.html
In his meatiest major-studio role outside the “Twilight” canon, Pattinson acquits himself well.


NBC
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/blogs/popcornbiz/120369779.html
While "Water for Elephants" isn't without some serious script-related stumbles (sorry, Hal), it's a pedigreed drama of great beauty that announces Pattinson as a star to be reckoned long after the dust of "Breaking Dawn" settles.


Rolling Stone
http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/reviews/water-for-elephants-2011042 1
Pattinson and Witherspoon smolder under the golden gaze of Rodrigo Prieto's camera.


TIME
http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,2066707,00.html#ixzz1KGzM SHON

Is there life beyond the living dead? Can Robert Pattinson, the 24-year-old Englishman who achieved a teen-talisman celebrity playing the dreamboat vampire Edward, find longevity in a post-Twilight Saga acting career?

For a few moments in Water for Elephants, the answer seems yes. As Jacob Jankowski, a part that requires him mainly to be shy and watchful, RPattz radiates a slow magnetism that locks the viewer's eyes on him.


Variety
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945058?refcatid=31
Looking far more handsome than Holbrook ever did, Pattinson brings the same sullen sensitivity to 23-year-old Jacob that he has to the "Twilight" pics -- perfectly fitting for an overnight orphan so recently derailed from his intended life path.
<snip>

Considering the unassuming roots of the book on which "Water for Elephants" is based, along with its misfit-focused subject, there's no small irony that the pic should attract such a first-choice roster of collaborators: From dream-cast headliners Pattinson, Witherspoon and Waltz all the way down the line to d.p. Roberto Prieto, composer James Newton Howard (whose rich orchestral score sadly lacks a clear theme) and production designer Jack Fisk, the show is strictly A-list.


ABC
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/hollywood_wrap&id=8 089526
Pattinson continues to impress outside the world of "Twilight." In this movie, he's a gentle wounded soul,


The Hollywood Reporter
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/water-elephants-movie-review-1 80802
—may be well-worn but can always work in the right hands, and Reese Witherspoon, Robert Pattinson and Christoph Waltz are all more than up to the task.

<snip>

Looking 300 per cent better than he did in his last non-”Twilight” outing, “Remember Me,” Pattinson is entirely convincing as Jacob, a Cornell veterinary school student who escapes from the ruin provoked by his parents' untimely death by almost inadvertently joining the circus.


Japan Times
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/rss/ff20120217a2.html
So "Water for Elephants comes as a surprise, because Pattinson in the lead role is, to put it bluntly, excellent. Director Francis Lawrence ("I am Legend") deploys Pattinson's particular privileged-but-unhappy aura to full advantage, and the movie reaps heaps of benefits from his skittishness, his subtle note of unreliability and that calculated lopsided grin. Plus, he takes a punch in the face, which is more than a little gratifying to witness. Win-win, all round.


Buffalo News
http://www.buffalonews.com/entertainment/gusto/movies/movie-reviews/ar ticle400539.ece
And, are you ready, the love triangle is acted splendidly by Witherspoon, Waltz and, yes, Pattinson as the young vet. It’s going to surprise people who’ve only seen Pattinson in “Twilight” foolishness that he can hold his own onscreen with a couple of Oscar winners, but the boy can.


CBS News Online, Showbuzz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBrl8pbBZgA
"This film transforms Pattinson into a full fledged movie star, holding his own against both Academy Award winner Christoph Waltz and Reese Witherspoon."


At the Movies
http://www.abc.net.au/atthemovies/txt/s3206367.htm
This is a most fabulous film, the performances of the three leads are exemplary,


Total Film
http://www.totalfilm.com/reviews/cinema/water-for-elephants
Drum roll, deathly hush… and glory be, he’s very watchable indeed in this lush, Depression-era melodrama, based on Sara Gruen’s US bestseller.

<snip>

He’s anchoring a movie that’s old-fashioned in the best sense; one that likes its spectacle big and spangly (lions and tigers and coochie girls, oh my!) and its emotional arc bigger, so Jacob’s mixture of restrained doe-eyed suffering, idealism, and hot-headed protectiveness fits it like a tuxedo.

Believability in a period role takes some doing, but Pattinson’s understated aw-shucks courtesy and retro Montgomery Clift vibe pulls it off with élan.

<snip>

Verdict:

A swoony, enjoyable, old-time romance whose best acts are a period-perfect Pattinson and a playful pachyderm.


Atlantic Highlands Herald
http://www.ahherald.com/columns-mainmenu-28/at-the-movies/10761-review -water-for-elephants
The movie is just so well done and so well cast. Who the heck is Robert Pattinson? We are talking a serious heart throb who can really act. Totally dominates the screen and is the hero on to the animals and people alike.


Irish mail
http://thinkingofrob.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/top-bmp.jpg
But up on the big screen, it's quite wonderful: beautiful to look at, immensely moving at times, and extraordinarily well cast and well acted.

Above all, this is the movie that surely proves Robert Pattinson will have a film career once the Twilight Saga comes to a close. Hollywood is chock-full of handsome young hunks but few are quite as photogenic, and here the camera absolutely loves him. Reminiscent of James Dean in some scenes, and more a young George Clooney in others; as long as he picks his projects wisely and looks after himself, Pattinson could be around for a long time.

And if he keeps making films as food as this, I won't be complaining.


Moviefone
http://www.moviefone.co.uk/2011/05/04/water-for-elephants-review-we-gi ve-our-verdict/
What's good about it?
<snip>

Pattinson could have been forgiven for phoning in his performance, relying solely on miraculous cheekbones and his current tidal wave of adoration. Instead, he acts his chops off, running around with a lot more colour in his cheeks than poor old Edward Cullen ever enjoyed. Pattinson fans needn't worry, the boy's proved there'll be life in him post-Twilight.


Killer Movie Reviews
http://www.killermoviereviews.com/main.php?nextlink=display&dId=14 05&subLinks=
Performances find the truth in the artifice of circus life, and of the movies. Witherspoon in particular is tough without being hard. Waltz, as in his Oscar™-winning turn in INGLORIOUS BASTERDS, makes evil fascinating and not a little seductive, while Pattinson, freed from the white pancake and clunking dialogue of the undead, brings a sweet innocence to the part, one that makes the symbolism of Rosie’s trunk curling up to his chin as he talks with Marlena disingenuous, almost sweet, rather than vulgar and obvious. And there is no getting around that the elephant playing Rosie holds her own in moments of both pathos and pure joy.


Hitfix
http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/review-water-for-ele phants-is-effective-old-fashioned-melodrama
It makes me laugh that Robert Pattinson is playing a character named Jacob in this one, but honestly, he continues to impress me as a guy who just needs to get past this particular moment in his career so he can start being viewed as an actor and not just his franchise.

<snip>

For me, Pattinson and Waltz are the movie.


Access Hollywood
http://www.accesshollywood.com/moviemantz/moviemantz-review-water-for- elephants_articletab_46945
not only does Pattinson give an impressive performance, but he also holds his own alongside his Oscar-winning co-stars,


The Sunday Mirror
http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/film/film-reviews/2011/05/01/fall-punch -trunk-in-love-with-water-for-elephants-115875-23097197/#ixzz1L2oN7uyG
Robert Pattinson takes a break from his moody vampire in the Twilight films to play a moody would-be vet in this elegant tale, and despite his role being as much about his looks as his performance, he is ­impressive as a penniless Pole who finds work and romance under the big top.


The CW
http://weblogs.thecwdc.com/entertainment/movies/willie-waffle/2011/04/ water-for-elephants-review.html
Pattinson is great with the longing looks, yearning for the woman he shouldn't pursue and the way he brings Jacob's compassion for the animals through to the audience,


Moviehole
http://www.moviehole.net/201139965-michael-predicts-water-for-elephant s-one-of-2011s-best-films
But the main attraction here is the performances of the three stars. Witherspoon has been very scarce on screen since winning the Best Actress Oscar in 2005 for “Walk the Line.” In the six years before winning the award she appeared in no fewer than nine films. Since, she has appeared in half that number. Her work here is perfectly nuanced in a role that could have quite easily been cliché’d. Waltz is perfect as August in a role that shows us why that Oscar win was so well deserved. But the surprise here, for me anyway, is Pattinson. Quiet and brooding in the “Twilight” films he seems to jump off the screen here, matching Waltz and Witherspoon scene for scene. Who knew this kid could act?? Well done young man.


MacLeans
http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/opening-weekend-water-for-elephants -african-cats-bill-cunningham-new-york/
Pattinson delivers a solid, well-modulated performance that shows there’s a real actor lurking in the skin of Twilight‘s Edward Cullen,


News of the World
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/notw/nol_showbiz/nolcelebrity_movies/1 284402/Verdict-Empathy-and-ivory.html
Plus, Pattinson's massive face looks quite a lot like Buster Keaton's - he's got a silent-movie-star quality that makes him a perfect choice for the lead. (Also, he's really good.)


Three Movie Buffs
http://www.threemoviebuffs.com/review/waterforelephants
As a fan of Witherspoon, but not normally of Pattinson, I would have guessed before the film that I would have liked her better, but while he actually does a great job, Reese seems miscast.


The Stirling Observer
http://www.stirlingobserver.co.uk/stirling-news/local-news-stirling/ne ws-stirling/2011/09/16/animal-attraction-of-elephant-movie-51226-29430 281/
Water For Elephants has a feel of old Hollywood glamour and storytelling about it. It is beautifully shot, has more than a hint of the movie romances of yesteryear and features strong performances from its leads.

<snip>

Pattinson doesn’t float my boat, but there’s no denying that he has a Rudolph Valentino screen idol look to him ideally suited to this movie.


Reel Talk Reviews
http://www.reeltalkreviews.com/browse/viewitem.asp?type=review&id= 3646
Plus various situations in the Big Top and on a train as the circus travels from town to town add considerable suspense to the film, and stars Reese Witherspoon (Oscar winner for Walk the Line), Robert Pattinson (Twilight), and Christoph Waltz (Oscar winner for Inglourious Basterds) deliver excellent performances in the key roles here. Pattinson surprised me with his sensitive portrayal of Jacob, a young veterinarian student who drops out of college after his parents die in a tragic accident.


The Movie Guy
http://entertainmentspectrum.com/index/movies/1163/waterforelephants.h tml
Pattinson shows maturity in his acting. He holds up his end as the central figure and also serves as the voice-over narrator for the bulk of the movie. His winning chemistry with the elephant is apparent from their initial meeting.


The Scorecard
http://thescorecardreview.com/review/film-reviews/2011/04/22/water-for -elephants/19593
Robert Pattinson as Jacob: He’s good. You can easily see why the ladies on the train throw themselves at him.
He gives Rob's performance a 7/10 and has a few snarky remarks but I count this as very positive since he gives Christoph and Reese 5 and 6, respectively.

Cole Smith The Smartest Film Critic in the World
http://www.colesmithey.com/capsules/2011/04/water-for-elephants.html
Set during the Depression, the film follows the adventures of Polish immigrant Jacob Jankowski (well played by Robert Pattinson).


Urban Cinefile
http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=17788&s=Reviews
A rich, layered story filled with emotional undercurrents, Water for Elephants is both a love story and a character drama, and satisfying on all counts. The three leads deliver wonderful characterisations and the screenplay (well adapted from the novel) adds depth and resonance to the love triangle in a way that rejuvenates the old device.

Robert Pattinson is completely free of his famous Twilight vampire persona as Jacob, and makes an effective, likeable (and minimalist) Jacob. There is just the right chemistry between him and Reese Witherspoon as Marlena, who clings to her domineering and volatile husband August, played with wonderful nuance by Christoph Waltz. The three of them, often on screen together, create a terrific dynamic.


Big Daddy Kev
http://www.bdkreviews.com/recent.php#waterforelephants
Anyone who thinks Robert Pattinson is just that kid from Twilight needs to watch this film or Remember Me. He is extremely talented and once Twilight is over, I really do feel that he's going to prove himself to be one of the best working actors today. His chemistry with Reese Witherspoon and Christoph Waltz, two Academy Award Winners, was perfect. The emotional range of Christoph Waltz mixed with the emotions of Pattinson and Witherspoon is what makes the film work.


The Daily Express
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/244966/Film-review-Water-For- Elephants/
Twilight heart-throb Pattinson is well cast.

Jacob is meant to be awkward, bashful and shy and Pattinson’s earnest performance supplies just those qualities, while having to spout dialogue such as: “You are a beautiful woman, you deserve a beautiful life.”


Liverpool Echo
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-entertainment/echo-reviews/20 11/05/06/film-review-water-for-elephants-100252-28643145/
Pattinson acquits himself well in this adaptation of the novel by Sara Gruen about a doomed love affair in a 1930s circus troupe, playing to his strengths – angry-ridden glances straight into the camera – as one point of a volatile love triangle that’s destined to end in tragedy.

He demonstrates impressive emotional range and although screen chemistry with Reese Witherspoon doesn’t exactly set our hearts aflutter, they are an attractive pairing.


What Would Toto Watch
http://whatwouldtotowatch.com/2011/04/22/water-for-elephants-movie-rev iew-toto-pattinson/
Frankly speaking, it’s a pleasure to get lost in this world. And while Pattinson can’t heat things up with Witherspoon, he’s a fine audience surrogate for the craziness under the big top. He oozes decency, which makes him stand out like a 3-D effect in this seedy terrain.


The Age
http://www.theage.com.au/entertainment/movies/water-for-elephants-2011 0519-1eu8i.html

Witherspoon is a tad twee while Pattinson puts in his best non-vampire work yet,


The Herald Sun
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/entertainment/movies/film-review-water-for -elephants/story-e6frf8r6-1226054557365
IF good looks could kill, Robert Pattinson would be facing charges of mass murder simply for stepping before the cameras.

The lady-slaying heart-throb of Twilight fame is not required to act in the conventional sense of the word.

Having been blessed with a delicately sculpted cranium that catches the light just so, all Pattinson needs to do is to remain relatively still and stare intently in an appropriate direction.

All the better for everyone else to stare intensely in his direction.

Needless to say, Water for Elephants is stacked with moody money shots of the Pattinson dial, which may never change channels in our lifetime.


Vulture
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/04/movie_reiew_robert_pattin son_l.html
In fact, Pattinson's beauty crowds out just about everything else.
This is actually said in a negative manner. I actually consider this a positive. In my opinion, what the viewer is reacting to is Rob's powerful screen presence. I think that's why some people had an over the top reaction. You can't take your eyes off him and it needs to be discussed whether positively or negatively.




Water for Elephants
http://tinyurl.com/6jpsf6p

reply

http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/film/film-reviews/2011/05/01/fall-punch -trunk-in-love-with-water-for-elephants-115875-23097197/#ixzz1L2oN7uyG

Fall punch-trunk in love with Water For Elephants
by Mark Adams, Sunday Mirror 1/05/2011

Four stars


THE STARS

Robert Pattinson, Reese Witherspoon, ­Christoph Waltz.

THE STORY

In the Depression era, veterinary student Jacob (Pattinson) finds work with a circus and falls for the star performer, ­Marlena (Witherspoon), much to the anger of the circus’s brutal ringmaster August (Waltz).

THE VERDICT

The unrepentantly old-fashioned Water for Elephants is a glorious piece of romantic drama that impressively recreates an old-time circus atmosphere and throws into the pot lingering glances, barely-restrained ­passions and a super-cute elephant. Slick, schmaltzy and tear-jerkingly entertaining, it is a very classy affair.

Robert Pattinson takes a break from his moody vampire in the Twilight films to play a moody would-be vet in this elegant tale, and despite his role being as much about his looks as his performance, he is ­impressive as a penniless Pole who finds work and romance under the big top.

The film is adapted pretty faithfully from Sara Gruen’s best-selling novel about lust and longing, with good-looking young Jacob finding work after walking the rails ­following the death of his parents.

Circus boss August (another mesmerising performance from Christoph Waltz, who won an Oscar for Inglourious Basterds) is set to throw Jacob off the circus’s train until he finds out he knows about animals.

This soon brings him close to August’s sexy wife, Marlena, the star act of the circus and a woman the ringmaster jealously guards. With her peroxide blonde hair and feisty manner, Reese Witherspoon looks the part but never truly convinces as a master of bareback horse riding. And while she and ­Pattinson look good together, their romance rarely ­smoulders.

But luckily between Pattinson, Waltz and Rosie the elephant, there is enough ­melodrama to keep things entertaining.

The film is beautifully shot and has a wonderful sense of Americana that helps bolster the period atmosphere.

The film comes together as a ­romance when Rosie arrives, with ­August’s menace and charm coming to the surface as he ­torments the beast and his wife.

And with a hunky and moody vet waiting in the wings, where else would any ­self-respecting circus beauty look for solace and support than in his manly arms?




Water for Elephants
http://tinyurl.com/6jpsf6p

reply

Moviefone
http://www.moviefone.co.uk/2011/05/04/water-for-elephants-review-we-gi ve-our-verdict/

Water For Elephants (12A)

Starring: Reese Witherspoon, Robert Pattinson, Christoph Waltz, Hal Holbrook
Director: Francis Lawrence
Running Time: 115 minutes
Trailer: Watch it here

What's it about?
In the aftermath of family tragedy, veterinary student Jacob (Robert Pattinson) jumps on a train and runs away with the circus. As the show moves between towns of heartland America, Jacob finds love under the Big Top with star performer Marlena (Reese Witherspoon), but also danger at the hands of her dastardly husband and circus-owner August (Christoph Walz).

What's good about it?
There's a lot of fun at this fair. Despite being set in the Depression era, the combination of trains to jump on, dwarves to sit on, elephants to ride on, all mean Water for Elephants has colour and vitality to support its central love story - in itself, a romping good yarn of forbidden love and being kind to animals.

Pattinson could have been forgiven for phoning in his performance, relying solely on miraculous cheekbones and his current tidal wave of adoration. Instead, he acts his chops off, running around with a lot more colour in his cheeks than poor old Edward Cullen ever enjoyed. Pattinson fans needn't worry, the boy's proved there'll be life in him post-Twilight.

What's not so good?
If Pattinson HAD tried to phone this one in, he would have got an engaged signal. Christoph Waltz walked off with an Oscar for his changeable Nazi in Inglourious Basterds, so perhaps it's understandable he's just hit the Reprise button here. But frankly, even on his loving days, he's just not attractive enough to explain Marlena sticking around instead of packing her trunk and saying goodbye.

Verdict:
With its penniless but handsome youth set to rescue fair, endangered maiden, it's basically Moulin Rouge set in the world of the Big Top. Or Titanic. Or any fairytale you care to mention. And with a big, soppy Dumbo set to save the day, well, what's not to love? Water for Elephants is a trumpety-trump triumph.





Water for Elephants
http://tinyurl.com/6jpsf6p

reply

Can we add Australian Reviews as well?

"Life is the most spectacular show on earth" - WFE

reply

Sure, go ahead and post them here and I'll add them. I was mainly keeping to RT reviewers because that percentage is easy to figure out and they are so-called legit critics but hey at this point why not post everything.



Water for Elephants
http://tinyurl.com/6jpsf6p

reply

Rob was really good as Jacob.

"Life is the most spectacular show on earth" - WFE

reply

Two of the Australian critics that helped pushed WFE's RT score to fresh. C&P from Rob's board. They called all three leads exemplary.

http://www.abc.net.au/atthemovies/txt/s3206367.htm

Water for Elephants
Rated M
Review by Margaret Pomeranz
One of the most popular books of recent years has been Sara Gruen's 2006 novel WATER FOR ELEPHANTS. It stars ROBERT PATTINSON as Jacob Jankowski a young man of immigrant parents who is just about to sit his final exams in veterinary science at Cornell University when he learns his parents have been killed in a road crash.

The year is 1932, it is the Depression. With no money and no family, Jacob takes to the roads and the railway tracks, lucking onto a circus train. Joining the circus he becomes, because of his background, the carer of Rosie the elephant on which the star of the circus, Marlena, REESE WITHERSPOON, will shine..

Marlene's increasingly unstable husband August, CHRISTOPH WALTZ, is suspicious of the relationship between his wife and Jacob..

This is a most fabulous film, the performances of the three leads are exemplary, I've never seen Reese Witherspoon better and Waltz dazzles, he is just so good. But there's so much more. The sheer magic of the circus - the big top going up is so exhilarating - the performances, particularly of Rosie just make you remember how wonderful that world is.

Of course in the film it has its dark side, but both are well handled by director Francis Lawrence, a music video director who has ventured into film with CONSTANTINE and I AM LEGEND. I was totally entranced by WATER FOR ELEPHANTS from the opening moment to the end.



Water for Elephants
http://tinyurl.com/6jpsf6p

reply

[deleted]

And Fresh on RT with 61 percent.

reply

And Fresh on RT with 61 percent.


I should start updating more of Rob's positive reviews but I've been so busy lately. I'll find time this week. I love reading all the positive things about this movie. I hope studios make more like it. It's easily one of the best movies this year.



Water for Elephants
http://tinyurl.com/6jpsf6p

reply

Still fresh and in theaters, $112 million worldwide.
.

reply

I'm really happy Rob got so many good reviews for this movie. It's an uphill struggle for a talented teen heartthrob but it's a struggle all have to endure. The good ones make it so I'm really excited to see Cosmopolis next. Breaking Dawn reviews are usually pre-written by fanboy critics months before plus the source material was never greatness anyway.



Water for Elephants
http://tinyurl.com/6jpsf6p

reply

Breaking Dawn reviews are usually pre-written by fanboy critics months before plus the source material was never greatness anyway.



I've always thought that Rob is generally receiving the best reviews from three of them. It was so in Twilight and Eclipse, right? He rocks that Edward guy But it can always be better, and I think they all will improve in BD, since they know by now what critics and audience expect from them!

reply

Edward is lovely. What I mean is, even if Rob provides a brilliant oscar worthy performance because it's Breaking Dawn and the critics have already written their useless reviews, I'm pretty sure he won't get more positive reviews than he did for WFE. Cosmopolis on the other hand should provide at least the same level or more. It will not matter whether or not Rob is better in Breaking Dawn. Sad but true. Critics have become really unprofessional and unable to actually write reviews based on what they're seeing on the screen.



Water for Elephants
http://tinyurl.com/6jpsf6p

reply

Well according to Rob, Breaking Dawn is going to be a horror movie, and they seldom get nod from the Academy. I have no idea what Summit is going to put in theaters, but when they were shooting, Rob saw it as a horror film.

When questioned about the birth scene he said:
"Yeah, I’ve done it," RPattz laughed, "I’ve chewed it, spat it out!"

Pattinson promises that Breaking Dawn will be "very different to the other films - more like a horror film."

Says Pattinson, "It's a horror movie. (laughs) Incredibly strange, it's a totally different genre. The first part of it is really a straight-up horror movie. The second one is more similar - well, there are a couple of weird bits in the second.

The first one is like, 'Huh?' (laughs) It's really left the box behind. But it's fine - it's such a long shoot, there's no consistency to which movie we're shooting at any time. I just know there's no way to avoid the freakishness of the story. The key story points are the weirdest parts of the story. It might end up being a cult movie."

Read more:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/04/15/PKD31ING4J DTL&ao=all#ixzz1JdzR1z5E
.

reply

Some new pics to ease the distress of not getting the DVD next month.

http://i891.photobucket.com/albums/ac118/ROBsessedBlog2/Movies/Water%2 0For%20Elephants/Tumblr/RobertPattinsonWFEDVD3-1.png

The rest here:
http://www.robsessedpattinson.com/2011/08/new-images-of-robert-pattins on-from.html
.

reply

Comments from the DVD, from the ROBsessedBlog tinyurl.com/3pshwb:

° They say Rob has a method to start sweating and go all pale but they won't reveal.

° Rob did his own stunt running alongside the track and catching the train. Francis was really nervous because if something got wrong it could be really awful.

° When Reese is with Silver Star in the train car, they ran out of time to shoot Rob's close up, so they did it 2 months later when Reese had already wrapped. Rob is talking to a television playing the take at the floor of the train car.

° Again, Rob did his own stunt when he's almost thrown out of the train. It was not so fast as it appears to be but it was a moving train.

° Francis thinks Rob does a good drunk

° They say Rob was a really good sport about everything. He never complained about a thing. He was always in a great mood.

° They are talking about Rob being sick and they think it was very funny. And the fact that Francis was all the time saying things like "ok, now grab her leg. Strap, strap, strap. Put her dress down. Reese, go for his belt" Their point is that in the day didn't sound romantic at all.
.

reply

The intro paragraph to this article mentions Rob as an Alister w/ Brad, George & Ryan:

Brad Pitt stars in "Moneyball," Ryan Gosling and George Clooney in "The Ides of March," and Robert Pattinson returns in "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 1" -- this year's fall movie lineup is packed with A-list men!

http://extratv.warnerbros.com/2011/08/a_guide_to_fall_2011_films.php
.

reply


ITA, chrisellgold.
Critics write reviews and pretend to know all about the movie without even having read the book. I think it's essential that when you write your judgement of an actor, you have to know how his character has to be performed. Since WFE is an adaptation of a book it seems only normal to me that you can only judge acting abilities after you've read the book or at least the script. But, having read all reviews on RT, I was almost upset to see their lack of aknowledge of the book's story and protagonists. Idem ditto with the Twilight series.
I understand a critic can't read all books but then his opinion has to be nuanced which often isn't the case.

reply

ITA, but according to the book and from what we know he had to "suffer" through the movie, it should be damn Oscar worth performance

reply

I'm really excited to see how Breaking Dawn turns out. It's actually occasionally my favourite book because it's completely nuts.


Water for Elephants
http://tinyurl.com/6jpsf6p

reply

[deleted]

New review. They thought Rob was great but didn't love the chemistry between him and Witherspoon. I thought the chemistry was fine. It seems to be the fall back complaint by critics though. I personally found far more chemistry in the movie than there was in the book itself.

The Stirling Observer
http://www.stirlingobserver.co.uk/stirling-news/local-news-stirling/ne ws-stirling/2011/09/16/animal-attraction-of-elephant-movie-51226-29430 281/

Water For Elephants has a feel of old Hollywood glamour and storytelling about it. It is beautifully shot, has more than a hint of the movie romances of yesteryear and features strong performances from its leads.

<snip>

Pattinson doesn’t float my boat, but there’s no denying that he has a Rudolph Valentino screen idol look to him ideally suited to this movie.



Bel Ami
http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lor68jncXv1qdv8gho1_500.gif

reply

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AW7fp5fnco
From the DVD special features: Rob Pattinson in the Spotlight.
.

reply

Mark Kermode's DVD review:

There's a genuine old-fashioned warmth to Water for Elephants (2011, Fox, 12), a throwback Depression-era melodrama in which Twilight star Robert Pattinson runs away to join the circus and finds himself torn between showgirl Marlena (the ever reliable Reese Witherspoon) and her scarily jodhpurred husband (Christoph Waltz).

Based on a novel by Sara Gruen, this good-looking, gently paced, something-for-all-the-family affair has oodles of charm, moments of high drama and innumerable opportunities for Waltz to steal the show with his clipped Teutonic diction and trademark smile-cum-sneer.

There's also plenty of picturesque animal action, ranging from jolly elephant antics to the most sanitised horse death scene ever committed to celluloid. Cynics may sneer, but the slow yet steady storytelling pays dividends and the performers (both two- and four-legged) give it their eager all.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/04/julias-eyes-13-assassins-dv d
.

reply

You know, I found the movie slower on DVD than it was in the theatre. Maybe because I watched it about 3 times before I got the DVD. It seemed to go by really fast when I watched it on the big screen.


Bel Ami
http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lor68jncXv1qdv8gho1_500.gif

reply

http://www.spunk-ransom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/WFE.jpg
Review from Australian magazine, Flash, Oct. 2011:

The film is... just like a circus act: spectacular looking, compelling, and breathtakingly beautiful. Breaking out of his Twilight mold, Pattinson does an exceptional job as the film's hero. Witherspoon notches up another great romantic performance, and if you're a movie producer looking for a good villain, you need to call Waltz's agent, right now.
.

reply

Thanks for posting Cullenista.

reply

From the Guardian article:

The director of Breaking Dawn, Bill Condon, describes him as supersmart: "That's the first thing you notice. He's very thoughtful and analytical. And he's a cineaste, you know? He loves a lot of genres and actors, so he seems like someone who can't wait to go explore."

His choice of roles in the past year bears this out. In May he starred in the Depression-era romance Water for Elephants, as a dashing vet who joins a circus after his parents die. Next year he'll appear in an adaptation of Guy de Maupassant's Bel Ami, which will involve him being a thoroughly bad egg and sleeping with Christina Ricci, Uma Thurman and Kristin Scott Thomas.

And then there's David Cronenberg's adaptation of the Don Delillo novel Cosmopolis, a Joycean story about a cheating Manhattan billionaire who loses his fortune in a single day. He has described the script as "insane and difficult"; the cast includes Samantha Morton, Paul Giamatti and Juliette Binoche. It's the big league, by any standard. More the choice of an actor seeking a challenge than a pretty boy looking for safe harbour.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/nov/06/robert-pattinson-interview- reality-bites
.

reply

Cronenberg talking about Rob again.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/11/20/david-cronenberg-on-a -dangerous-method-robert-pattinson-s-acting-and-s-m-with-keira-knightl ey.html

Another young actor whose acting ability has polarized critics is Twilight star Robert Pattinson, who stars as a millionaire enduring a limo-driven odyssey across Manhattan in Cronenberg’s next film—an adaptation of Don DeLillo’s novel Cosmopolis.

“I think that [skeptics] are being critical of the Twilight series, they’re not being critical of him,” said Cronenberg. “He’s just a cog in that machine and they’re confusing the nature of that project with him. He’s a terrific actor, trust me. I’ve directed some of the best in the world, and he’s terrific.”
.

reply

Rob has a new film that's called The Rover, and the teaser it getting a great reception:

“This is one of the best teasers since Interstellar – give this one a watch right away.” @firstshowing #TheRover

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7C95zhu7yA
The Rover teaser. It's a bit darker than WFE.

reply

http://tinyurl.com/6psmh2k

11 — "Water for Elephants":I'm always leery of movies that feature actors who have found a niche in a wildly popular series. In this case, Robert Pattinson of "Twilight" fame, actually shows how good an actor he really is. Based on a best-selling book, the movie about a college dropout who joins a circus is incredibly moving. Ironically, Pattinson plays a guy named Jacob.




Bel Ami
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1440732/#lb-vi642620953

reply

http://www.mininggazette.com/page/content.detail/id/523877/Zach-of-All -Trades-Zach-Kukkonen.html?nav=5061

A few movies worth watching from 2011

"Water for Elephants" - A great book was made into an almost equally great movie. Sprawling, grand sets explore the life of a circus in the Great Depression. While Robert Pattinson and Reese Witherspoon do solid jobs as the stars of the movie, Christoph Waltz steals the movie as August, the owner of the circus.




Bel Ami
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1440732/#lb-vi642620953

reply