Don't you think that Sandra Bullock should have undressed 20 years ago and not now when she is 45 years old?
She is FAR too old for such scenes now. It's the right time for her to play mothers of teenagers rather than single young ladies looking for a husband! Searching for lost youth is pathetic.
what are you, 16, 17? You think someone in their 40's is OLD? Wow, you really have zero life experience, don't you? Yeah, she's a bit older than Ryan, but in case you didn't notice...her body is f##king AMAZING, especially for a 40+ mother.
I'm 20 years her junior, and I would rather see her naked than half of the actresses half her age. She is adorable, sexy, and spunky. If you can't see that, I pity you, because surely, somewhere, your balls must be rolling down the hallway of a seedy motel. Go find them, grow some hair on them, and maybe then you'll see what people who aren't blinded by abject stupidity and age-ism see.
Honestly, if she's half as great in person as she is in interviews and in her films, even if she weren't famous, I would date her before I'd date, say, Megan Fox. In a heartbeat. Even though she's older. Wouldn't matter to me.
she looks hot naked. 40s or 20s. i mean how about brooke shields, cindy crawdford, etc once they hit 40 should they stop too? i mean why should a 40 some year old actress stop doing nudity? as long as she looks hot if she was 50 and naked she would look sexy.
Sandra Bullock can get naked in all of her movies if she wants she's hot and looks great naked.. She's a good actress and does a good acting job in 99 percent of her movies. but Speed 2 that was junk not her fault though.