Don't you think that Sandra Bullock should have undressed 20 years ago and not now when she is 45 years old?
She is FAR too old for such scenes now. It's the right time for her to play mothers of teenagers rather than single young ladies looking for a husband! Searching for lost youth is pathetic.
astat-2:
You sound superficial and ridiculous. Firstly, you barely see anything. It's all a blur for the most part. And just because you're not 25 anymore, you can't show your body briefly in a movie? Even if she was wrinkly and weighed 1,000 pounds, she can be naked in any movie they want her naked in. Nudity is often used for a cheap thrill, but it's also used frequently in a way not meant to entice the viewer as well. And let's not forget that she looked fantastic. Her body didn't look like that of someone "old" anyway.
Would you be saying these things if she were a man?
She wasn't playing a "single young lady looking for a husband." She was supposed to be a bit older, near 40. She wasn't looking for a husband, she only got married to get a green card. Did you pay any attention to the movie, or did you not see it, and you're just here to complain about the "nude" scene you heard about?
And just because Sandra's a 45 year old woman doesn't mean she needs to play mothers of teenagers. Being middle-aged doesn't mean the only acting roles are parents.
Yet again, would you be saying these things if she were a man? I don't see anyone complaining that George Clooney or Brad Pitt should cover up and play fathers.
The OP is an idiot.
shareGive me a break--she doesn't even look 45! And that's not old anyway.
Dammit Carol Sue, where is the vodka?!
She isn't playing a "young lady" here -- hello -- it is said that she is older than Ryan. Goldie Hawn and Susan Sarandon are but two actresses with younger husbands/mates. It happens.
She doesn't look a mom in that lingerie. If she does, it's definitely MILF territory. If you want to oogle at twenty somethings, see a different movie.
1. Exactly. Far too old for the role.
2. Yes, she is hot for her age but only for her age. You cannot cheat time. A 45-year-old woman should not undress in front of a camera. It's neither aesthetic nor tasteful. And as I said before, she should have done this (play in a naked scene) 20 years ago. If she decided not to do that, she should not change her decision now, when it's too late.
3. A 35-year-old actress (or younger), I don't know who exactly but it does not matter, would make this movie much better.
This is one of the most ridiculous posts I've ever read. I doubt anyone in your life, no less on IMDB, cares about your narrow-minded opinion. Have a great day!
Next stupid question. Sandra looks fine without any clothes. Ever laid with a woman in her 40's? You should try it sometime.
shareI'd rather see her naked than most of these so-called sexy actresses in their 20's. This woman is hot and always has been. End of story.
shareJust because someone is a lil older that doesnt make you ugly. Some older people look better and are in better shape than younger people. You're just discriminating here, cuz its not like she looked ugly. She has a great body for a 45 year old. Why shouldn't she show it? Thats difinatly something for her to be proud of :D
Whooo are youuu?