MovieChat Forums > Redbelt (2008) Discussion > Have Your Redbelt Criticisms Refuted Her...

Have Your Redbelt Criticisms Refuted Here


Bring 'em on. I'll start with the most common (clearly stupid) ones:

1) It was all a plot to make Mike earn the Redbelt

Stop being stupid. You can not have damn near 100 people orchestrate the same fantasy without paying them all. In THE GAME, which was kinda stupid really, everyone was getting paid. No one had a financial interest in tricking Mike Terry into "earning" the redbelt.

2) People would not go so far to get Mike to fight.

No one cared if Mike fought on the undercard or not. They just offered it to him to shut him up. The con had nothing to do with Mike fighting. Wake up. They were just trying to buy him off so he'd shut up.

3) Fight fans would not enjoy such an unfair arrangement (black/white stone).

No *beep* The promoters were complaining that there are not enough fight fans. They wanted to use this GIMMICK to get poeple who don't care about fighting to watch... This was clear in Jerry Weiss's early comment "we could make it like a reality show"... who watches reality shows? Not sports fans - the masses! They wanted to appeal to the masses, not the fans of the sport. They don't give a *beep* about the fans - more than part of Mike Terry's beef with the whole arrangement.

4) The bullet.

No *beep* way they could have the bullet shell. It was a bluff. The lawyer realised this, so she said "we'll go straight to court." She would not be stupid enough to try a bluff if she didn't know she was being bluffed. Too bad for the bluffers, except that the cop wasn't in on the bluff, fell for it, and offed himself... oops... now Mike is pissed... "gonna blow it wide open."

5) The Emperor's Belt/Red Belt

G'damn. These are the best fighters in the world. You're all MMA/jiujitsu fans, but you can't recognise the difference between a fight over money/a girl and a fight over the honor of the sport? Well, guess what, the best of the best of course can. They knew, in a heartbeat, what Mike Terry was fighting for, after seeing him fighting one of the word's best fighters after having his name taken off the undercard. These are true martial artists, FFS... they know it when they see a real fight, opposed to competition ("competition weakens the fighter").

6) The con was too elaborate

It wasn't elaborate. You are mistaking happenstance for planned events. Jerry Weiss was just WISE enough to use those events to his advantage when the situation arose. He didn't plan for Mike to know he'd given him a stolen watch. He didn't plan for the lawyer to stupidly let off a gun in the jiu jitsu school. He just took advantage of these facts to steal Mike's black/white stone idea. he convinced you dumbasses that he planned it all from the beginning of the movie because his name is Mr. WISE and yours is Mr. STUPID.

Anything else?
...................
It's a movie, people! It's not, nor is it meant to be, real life!

reply

after finding so many terrible interpretations of the movie yours is a wonderously steady voice of reason. thanks for your post(s).

reply

HULK SMASH!!!!! LOL, good job man. i love this movie.



R.I.P. Bernie Mac

reply

ok, i'm taking up the challenge. here's where i refute all of your refutations.

01/02) "It was all a plot to make Mike earn the Redbelt.People would not go so far to get Mike to fight."

ah, but the promotor did provide quite an incentive (blackmail) to get him to fight. later on in the movie they offer to pay him off with a rigged fight. why not pay him off to begin with, and save the trouble of blackmailing him? sure, he asked for $200,000 but he really only had a pressing need for the $30,000 his wife owed the loanshark. is he really going to spend all that time pursuing a lengthy court battle when he could pay his debts right away?

3) "Fight fans would not enjoy such an unfair arrangement (black/white stone)."

true, but neither would these hard-core samurai fighters, none of whom seem to have a problem besmirching the honor of the sport. and if it's so dishonorable, what does that say about the guy who came up with it and uses it in his teachings?

4) "No *beep* way they could have the bullet shell. It was a bluff.

of course they had the bullet shell. they had pictures of it. they also knew whose fingerprints were on it. what, they took photos, dusted it, threw it away, and THEN tried to use it in a blackmail?

5) "The Emperor's Belt/Red Belt"

dude, screw the belts, the COPS would've busted that thing up waaay before mike could get to the stage. and leaving all that aside - he already beat the guy; why go for the cliche karate kid ending in the ring? cheap.

6) The con was too elaborate

"It wasn't elaborate. You are mistaking happenstance for planned events. He didn't plan for Mike to know he'd given him a stolen watch. He didn't plan for the lawyer to stupidly let off a gun in the jiu jitsu school. He just took advantage of these facts to steal Mike's black/white stone idea."

no, no and no. here's the thing. there was no need for a con of any kind. once the manager stole the idea there was no need for him to do anything. even if he's too slimy to pay a dime, so? people get sued all the time, and guess what? the guy with the money usually wins. the manager could just say mike had traded the idea for the producing credit. hell, he could've legitimately traded the idea. and why fix the undercard fight? if "the money's in the rematch", as the promotor says?

neither the stolen watch nor the gun incident at school had any bearing on the idea being stolen. and yet, it had to have been set up earlier, or else why would mike's wife have told about the gun incident? i mean seriously, imagine that phone call:

WIFE: "hi, mr hollywood manager? even though i'm not supposed to know at this point in the movie that you're in league with the fight promotor, and even though your client's wife ditched me, resulting in me owing $30,000 to a loan shark, i thought you might like to have this shell casing, which you can use to blackmail my husband with. even though he's trying to sue you and get $200,000, more than enough to pay our debts. maybe instead you can use this info i've given you to cause my husband to fight in a match that for all i know he might lose."

MANAGER: "gee, thanks wife. i really appreciate this phone call, especially because he hasn't sued me yet. i guess all those phone numbers we gave you that didn't work started working again, and you were able to get ahold of me"

because that is literally what would've had to have happen for this NOT to be a con. bottom line? there was an insanely unnecessary and elaborate con, which mamet did not work through, resulting in plot holes you could fly a zeppelin through. sorry to be so long winded here. see "my someone please explain WHY? (spoilers galore)" post for even more on the subject.

Game set and match. I win.




reply

"why not pay him off to begin with, and save the trouble of blackmailing him?"

Because that would be as good as admitting that they owe him royalties for the idea. Clearly the promoters weren't stupid enough to give away their hand, unlike someone else here (not pointing any fingers).

"...true, but neither would these hard-core samurai fighters, none of whom seem to have a problem besmirching the honor of the sport."

Who said they were ALL "hard-core samurai fighters". I don't think undercard fighters are generally gonna have much say in what is and isn't honorable in an organized fight. They're just trying to make a buck and a name.

"...and if it's so dishonorable, what does that say about the guy who came up with it and uses it in his teachings?"

He didn't come up with it. The samurai did. Next time you watch a movie, it might pay to pay attention. He used it for training, not competition. I can't imagine how you connect that to dishonor.

"of course they had the bullet shell. they had pictures of it. they also knew whose fingerprints were on it. what, they took photos, dusted it, threw it away, and THEN tried to use it in a blackmail?"

They had pictures of A shell. Could a been a CSI MIAMI prop for all you or anyone else knows. They knew whose prints were on it because the wife told them who the shell belonged to. It is possible they had the shell, but there's nothing to verify it but their claims. Which is why the lawyer didn't believe them... because she's a shade brighter than you and the dead cop.

"dude, screw the belts, the COPS would've busted that thing up waaay before mike could get to the stage."

He already took out all the security. And I highly doubt the fight promoters wanted the police involved in their little dispute over rigged fights. Even without that, you expect too much of your local police force.

"neither the stolen watch nor the gun incident at school had any bearing on the idea being stolen. and yet, it had to have been set up earlier, or else why would mike's wife have told about the gun incident? i mean seriously, imagine that phone call...because that is literally what would've had to have happen for this NOT to be a con. bottom line?"

Fail. Seriously, you need to pay more attention at the movies or stick to Disney features. Since you have no idea what happens in a movie unless it is spelled out for you, I'll help you connect the dots on this one:

Wife owes money to sharks. Can't repay. Husband is unhelpful. She quite naturally goes to her brother, who is in league with said sharks. She asks for help. Explains about the borrowed money, her husband's deal with movie star going sour, her deal with movie star's wife going sour as a result, all her other debts, husband's useless jujitsu center, broken windows; brother puts two and two together (cause he can read between the lines, unlike some), realizes this might be helpful with his FIGHT PROMOTION DEAL THAT THAT IDIOT MIKE IS MESSING UP! He gets the whole story out of her. Do you now have any idea who HIS next phonecall was to?

HELLO??? McFLY???

Like I said, it was not elaborate. His wife called the hollywood manager? Did you even know til now that her brothers were the people setting up the rigged fights with the fat fight promoter?

Like I said: fail. But thanks for playing.

...................
It's a movie. It's not, nor is it meant to be, real life!

reply

[deleted]

EDIT: I think I replied to the wrong post, but what the heck...


The whole fabric thing was simply Chet and his wife dropping Terry and his wife like toys they no longer want play with, probably under instruction from Chet's manager. The point being: The movie industry is corrupt and without honour, and people like Terry get shafted.

Chet was alone in the bar because he was a drunk and wanted to get into a fight because he hates his life, hates who he is. Terry saves him and Chet tries to pay him back the only way he knows how: get him into the movie business because hey, that what everyone wants. Money. Fame.

The manager gives him a hot watch because that the esteem he holds Terry in. The watch represents the corruption of Hollywood. How would they know that Terry would give the watch away?

Think about what happened. A cop has been suspended over the bent watch. A cop. The manager needs to get himself and Chet as far away from Terry and that watch as possible. Hence Chet vanishes and his wife stops taking calls.

The fight industry is corrupt and steals his idea. When they see that Terry could actually try and sue them (they are at a meeting with Terry and a lawer, that meeting had to be prearranged), they need leverage. Chet's manager is the link as to how the fight industry got to steal his marble thing. That is all. Once he appears, the lawer thinks they can prove they stole the idea. So the bullet incident comes to light.

(I am stumped as to how they get so much information, though. Perhaps the cop told them and betrayed Terry, hence the sucide?)

Later, when he finds further corruption within the fight game, again, money is the solution. They offer him a fixed fight in return where he can get 50k.

I don't see any big conspiracy, because ultimately, why would they want Terry to fight? He is a unknown, not some big name that would generate ticket revenue or sponsorship. They just want him to go away.

reply

3) Fight fans would not enjoy such an unfair arrangement (black/white stone).

No *beep* The promoters were complaining that there are not enough fight fans. They wanted to use this GIMMICK to get poeple who don't care about fighting to watch... This was clear in Jerry Weiss's early comment "we could make it like a reality show"... who watches reality shows? Not sports fans - the masses! They wanted to appeal to the masses, not the fans of the sport. They don't give a *beep* about the fans - more than part of Mike Terry's beef with the whole arrangement.

It's not really that fight fans wouldn't enjoy an unfair arrangement, but the way athletic commissions are now, they would never in a hundred years sanction such a bout. Strangely enough, it'd probably be for many of the reasons that people on this board claim that "fight fans wouldn't enjoy such an unfair arrangement". If you would really wanted to hold an event like this, you could, but it'd be untelevised and filmed in somebody's basement.

5) The Emperor's Belt/Red Belt

G'damn. These are the best fighters in the world. You're all MMA/jiujitsu fans, but you can't recognise the difference between a fight over money/a girl and a fight over the honor of the sport? Well, guess what, the best of the best of course can. They knew, in a heartbeat, what Mike Terry was fighting for, after seeing him fighting one of the word's best fighters after having his name taken off the undercard. These are true martial artists, FFS... they know it when they see a real fight, opposed to competition ("competition weakens the fighter").
Hmm. I can't see how any grandmaster would give his student a red belt for engaging in a street-fight and breaking people's arms willy-nilly. If anything was counter to the principles of Brazilian Jiujitsu, it'd probably be that. Even the corrupt, profit-mongering, evil and decadent UFC doesn't condone streetfighting, at least not on its reality shows.

I've been away for a while, so I'm kind of lost on your points. If you could so courteously reiterate what you mean, since your descriptions of the criticisms are quite brief, I would probably be able to inquire further on points that bothered me or criticisms that I held of this movie.

For one thing, I understand that the cop shot himself over a watch, but it was a very silly thing to do. Add to that, he left his weapon unattended and unlocked and in plain view of a stranger, which makes two points of why this man is not suited to be a police officer, and any further mourning of his death in the movie was unnecessary (he was an idiot, let us pray).

When I'm 60, I still won't be able to get over the "competition weakens the fighter" axiom . Since I don't see Mike Terry running out in the street starting random fights, because that would most likely go against the mores of the society he lives in, can I then assume that he actually means "fighting weakens the fighter"? In which case, I can apply this to all professions where the stakes are high... why should soldiers, cops bother competing at anything? It obviously weakens them.

I can tell it's not based in real life. In fact, I am certain this all occurs in David Mamet's fantasy land and the planned sequel was to feature him drawing back the shades, letting in the light, and allowing the residents of Mametland to finally become self-aware. (Ohmigod.... we're.... we're trapped in an awful movie? What's with the repetitive dialogue? What's with the repetitive dialogue?)

...I hope you understand as you prepare your response that I'm not attacking you with all this sarcasm, I'm just attacking the film.

reply

"Ohmigod.... we're.... we're trapped in an awful movie? What's with the repetitive dialogue? What's with the repetitive dialogue?"

Man, I can't believe I read all your drivel for that one good line. And then you want me to repeat my thoughts? What's up with that. Plenty of other people got what I was on about, what are you on about?

Everyone knew they weren't just watching some random street fight. They were fighting for a purpose (dignity of the sport). Of course UFC doesn't condone such actions - they don't get paid.

Yes, the cop wasn't too bright. He also wasn't a very happy person. His wife was obviously planning to leave him (pay attention to the details, sparky), and he was apt to lose his badge if not serve jail time. Smarter people have offed themselves over less.

'can I then assume that he actually means "fighting weakens the fighter"?'

You can assume whatever you like, but you're not making much sense. Pretty sure he meant fighting for money/pride/fame weakens the fighter. Your cop/soldier comparison, again, and not surprisingly, misses the point: cops and soldiers engage in competition for training and practice, not for venal reasons.

Or maybe he meant that if you engage in too many fights, you tend to feel a bit tender around the edges: no good comin' home from fightnight with a busted nose only to find some ahole ransacking your house and you being in no condition to defend your harem. All your womens are belong to Terry.

...................
It's a movie, people! It's not, nor is it meant to be, real life!

reply

Man, I can't believe I read all your drivel for that one good line. And then you want me to repeat my thoughts? What's up with that. Plenty of other people got what I was on about, what are you on about?

You have certainly found the fastest way to issue a rebuttal without having to say anything of substance. Of course you won't answer - having to defend a story that is weak as *beep* won't net you major e-points for the most contrite retraction you've ever written... assuming you DO realize the error in your ways before Jesus (Read: Mamet's Self-Perceived Image) returns.

"You want me to repeat my thoughts?????!?!?!?!!??!" I won't ask, since it's too lofty of an expectation. Nope, plenty of other non-morons, unlike myself, got it... so you, nor Mamet, have to explain yourselves to the unintelligent mob that either didn't understand or didn't care to watch Redbelt.
Everyone knew they weren't just watching some random street fight. They were fighting for a purpose (dignity of the sport). Of course UFC doesn't condone such actions - they don't get paid.
How exactly would everyone know they weren't watching a streetfight? It's not like Mike Terry is famous. If I saw two dudes fighting at a UFC event in the hallway or something, it would probably be classified by major media networks, websites, fight fans, and YouTube as... a streetfight. And boohoo, really, about the UFC. When Brazilian Jiujitsu masters decry streetfighting, it's noble. When Dana White does it, there's obviously an ulterior motive. You offer no justification for your double standard... you just state it as if it were fact. I honestly thought you weren't petty like that.
Yes, the cop wasn't too bright. He also wasn't a very happy person. His wife was obviously planning to leave him (pay attention to the details, sparky), and he was apt to lose his badge if not serve jail time. Smarter people have offed themselves over less.
Great justification on why we should care about the cop shooting himself. "Smarter people" have done stupider things. What a concept. Next time you refute anything on this thread, topic, messageboard, I shall remember your truism.
You can assume whatever you like, but you're not making much sense. Pretty sure he meant fighting for money/pride/fame weakens the fighter. Your cop/soldier comparison, again, and not surprisingly, misses the point: cops and soldiers engage in competition for training and practice, not for venal reasons.
Had to have made some sense for you to understand me. I had to look up venal, honestly, and it seems to mean "associated with or characterized by bribery". My response to that is you're an unschooled whelp. You don't know that military hand to hand systems originate from martial arts with strong competitive backgrounds such as Judo, Brazilian Jiujitsu, Muay Thai, and gasp, even MMA, do you? The fighters there are motivated by whatever you wish, glory, fame, pride... perhaps even the noblest aspirations of purity and self-enlightenment... but the ancillary benefit is that we can study the best of them and how they apply their art. This is not something you would get without competition. Without competition, far and lazy theorists (Honestly tell me that you're not one of these, because I'm developing a mental picture of you) would sit around debating the finer aspects of pugilism without practicing it. To develop and design a system of fighting like Brazilian Jiujitsu requires you to devote lots of time and study to it... time and study that could be spent being compensated in some other occupational field. But since you chose to be a martial artist, you must either teach, fight professionally, or moonlight. It is not a "venal practice", it is simply fight capitalism. Before you bag on a fighter for getting paid to fight, maybe you should look in the mirror and ask yourself how you put food on the table. Oh, did you... have to compete against others? In school? For a job? To make a living? Yeah, that's what I thought. Maybe it won't seem so corrupt then, while you and Mamet peer outside your self-enclosed, philosophical nonsense bubbles.
Or maybe he meant that if you engage in too many fights, you tend to feel a bit tender around the edges: no good comin' home from fightnight with a busted nose only to find some ahole ransacking your house and you being in no condition to defend your harem. All your womens are belong to Terry.
Even if YOU read this a second time, you would agree this is a stupid, puerile attempt at escaping scrutiny of your rather flimsy argument.

reply

[deleted]

I would have bust a cap in my head at the beginning of the film, if I was the copper married to that grotbags.
When she was moaning about money and saying "who's gonna pay the bills Mike?"
Made me want to punch her lights out. I've never dreamt of hitting a woman before but she would get a body punch at least lol.

reply

My question is... why is the con activated in the first place?

I don't think Weiss simply capitalized on a good situation, there is simply too much coincidence. The Chet bar fight is too staged and the presence of the magician and the responding officers at the fight supports the idea that this is part of the con.

Plus Chet and his wife have to be in on it b/c of the disconnected numbers. Why would she disconnect the numbers at the say so of Weiss, espescially if she honestly liked Sondra's fabrics? The war film's fight choreographer's presence at the fight also supports Chet's involvement. (Maybe he's the link from Chet to Mike)

That begs the question: If the con was set up before Mike made the (forced and overly obligatory) revelation of his fight gimmick, then why was it executed in the first place? If they knew about it before hand, then why didn't they use it without getting him to tell them about it?

The answer is simple. It's a contrived thematic conspiracy and not a realistic conspiracy. Mamet wants to comment on the state of capitalism affecting the purity of just about anything... including jiujitsu. In this version, everyone is in on it, and the hero is ultimately rewarded for his purity. It's frustrating because if Mamet was able to make this conspiracy plausible and improve the thematic scope of his film, it could've been a great film. As is, it's good. Better than the average flick.

Are you chewing gum??!!!

reply

HULK-SMASH you are cracking me up. Plus I also agree with your insights. I loved this movie! What a hidden gem!
And Kudos for "controlling your opponents by controlling yourself." (you must be exhausted)
I cant understand WHY people who dont like a movie would spend any time whatsoever on a board about it!? WTF move on.


Be the Change You Wish to See in the World. Gandhi
There is NO Gene for the Human Spirit. Gattaca

reply

Hey Hulk, why does Mike Perry go after Mr. Flynn at the end?

Be the Change You Wish to See in the World. Gandhi
There is NO Gene for the Human Spirit. Gattaca

reply

I guess he thinks Mr. Flynn will be as disgusted as he to hear about the fight fixing.

...................
It's a movie, people! It's not, nor is it meant to be, real life!

reply

yes thats what I thought too, thanks!

Be the Change You Wish to See in the World. Gandhi
There is NO Gene for the Human Spirit. Gattaca

reply

One big hole in this movie for me was the cop's suicide.

From the beginning of the movie, the cop was not portrayed as a weak character.

Why wouldn't he have charged the guy that was shady and didn't pay him for his services? He was a cop, could have done so easily surely.

And why after hearing that his friend would sort out the watch incident would he go and shot himself?

Okay perhaps he hears that he might get in trouble about the gun incident, that is still not enough to shot yourself.

And another thing that bugged me is the wife. Her husband lying in his office with a bullet in his head and her reaction. WHO"S GOING TO PAY THE BILLS.

WHATEVER!

The wife would be a complete mess, possibly having a breakdown of sorts. Not immediatley worried about the bills. I mean come on!

If that was 3 weeks later, yeah sure maybe.

reply

Actually I'm not so sure that Joe committed suicide. I think it's a little ambiguous.

reply

Re: cop's suicide.
______________________

I fear you don't know what a plot hole is, jrcharming. Weak motivation for a character's actions does not a plot hole make. Also, the motivation for the guy's suicide was not weak, though your reading of the character may well be.

It was established early that the cop was having marital problems; plobably heading for divorce. It was also established that he didn't have all that much heart. During training, he gave up his sparring matches when it got tough. As you pointed out, he let the mobster owners of the bar he worked at screw him round on his pay. Your claim that he was a strong character has no backing. He's no Dirt Diver.

He also had more than just the shooting incident to worry about. He'd been done for hocking a stolen watch. Suspended and possibly gonna lose his badge - for sure if word of the shooting incident gets to his betters (which the fight promoters were threatening to do) - and already he had to work second jobs to make ends meet. With the wife already considering leaving him because there's "not enough steaks in the freezer," the film gives more than enough motivation for his suicide.

My only complaint about his suicide is that he was gullible enough to believe the fight promoters' claims of evidence, but, as has been shown, he wasn't the strongest of characters. Mike said he was gonna fix the watch problem. Then, all of a sudden, he hears that evidence of the shooting incident may come to light. Goodbye badge. Goodbye pension. Hello dishonorable discharge. He cracked under too much pressure. A lot of people do.

As for the wife complaining about the bills, I guess you've never heard of subtext. She is not complaining about the bills. She is complaining about her dead husband, something she perceives (arguably rightly) Terry to have caused. People don't generally say what they mean. If a high school student had written the script, quite probably she would have been moaning, "You killed my husband! You killed my husband!" This would make for poorly written dialogue, but I guess it would save you some confusion.

You also don't know if she would be an immediate mess or not. Her husband was just found dead. People in a state of shock are often relatively calm. She wasn't worried about the bills, she was just saying the first thing that came to her mind while attempting to impart to Terry that he has royally screwed up her day.

Seriously, if one can't read between the lines of a dramatic exchange (something most people do instinctively), it's best to say, "I don't get it," and maybe have someone fill you in. You're not gonna come off too clever announcing, "Oh, this dialogue is so silly; it doesn't make any sense." Better to say nothing and have people think you a fool...

...................
It's a movie, people! It's not, nor is it meant to be, real life!

reply

Mike Terry would've faced many, many charges of aggravated assault for his 'valiant' behavior. The script needed more time in the oven.

reply

Outstanding!

















reply

[deleted]

HULK-SMASH = Smartest guy on IMDB message boards.

I don't get all the hate for this movie, or why so many people are convinced it is one convoluted long con. It is a series of events in the life of a man trying to live by a code in a world of people who have no code.

Mamet has said, this is his Samurai film. It is not The Spanish Prisoner or House of Games. I love it for what it is.

reply