It was ambiguous, indeed.
I think she was being supportive and tried to be helpful more than anything else. I vaguely remember someone asking Beth what she'd do if chess didn't exist (or something like that). And she didn't answer. I think she wanted the boy to think about it because he obviously didn't see anything else but chess! ("I don't understand", he kept saying). The flipside to Beth's chess talent/obsession is the way she copes (drugs and alcohol) with what comes with it and she could foresee that happening to him too, maybe.
So, the boy not being a threat anymore, she has no reason to keep being mean for nothing and, seeing him a mini-Beth, she didn't want him to make the same mistakes she did (and still does). Because if chess goes sideways... what coping mechanism will he use? Will it be self-destructive, like Beth's ? Having more than one interest and more than one goal in life (something she doesn't have) could probably prevent that.
After planting that seed in his mind, she did tell him "You're the best I've ever played". She wouldn't have said that if she was still in a mean state of mind, I think.
It's making me think just now.. it's a bit of how Mr Shaibel was austere and cold with her. But she could still perceive his benevolence. Especially when she asked "You think I'm good?" and he told her "Honestly kid? You're outstanding."
Her attitude with the boy was resembling that since she felt threatened by him, not unlike Mr Shaibel felt threatened by her when she started beating him (he was frustrated at some point). But ultimately he wanted the best for her and acted accordingly.
I also just thought of another thing. The boy was russian. Just like the only player Beth said she was afraid of. Borgov. So maybe that just added up to everything else and contributed to her unsympathetic attitude toward him at first.
All in all, she was inviting him to consider expending his horizons in order to not put all his eggs in the same basket, which could be dangerous, I think.
reply
share