Quote: "I don't remember the specific episode all that well, but I'm sure not all of it is controversial."
Passta, ANYTHING can be controversial for some idiots. None of the Tintin albums was "racist" - and certainly not Hergé himself. What you can discern in the original version of "Tintin au Congo" is not racism, but a kind of "paternalism" for the Africans and it was quite common in these years.
Editing out these scenes, or the drinking habits of Captain Haddock, not only would be totally stupid, but what I call revisionism.
You must also consider that Hergé wasn't Walt Disney, not only Tintin & Milou's adventures were realistic, but European kids were, and still are, much more mature than their American counterparts.
And it's still the case, look on IMDb for horror movies for instance, a film classified "above 18" (or something like it) is generally restricted to Under 12 in France for instance. And furthermore, the US version can be cut, and the French version totally uncut.
You want edit Haddock's alcoholism, you can as well erase the character.
WC Fields, to my knowledge, is an alcoholic in practically all his movie, and what do you want? Forbidding all his movies, who are masterpieces of American cinema?
In the past, American have sanitized Lucky Luke, another Belgian creation, in showing him with a flower between his lips unstead of his usual cigarette. The result? movie crap.
Nobody became alcoholic or smoker in watching a movie. I discovered Tintin when I was nine, and practically never drink any alcohol, excepted when I'm at a dinner with friends, and this happens, perhaps, no more than ten times a YEAR.
Walt Disney and his aseptized version of Nature was certainly more nocive than the Hergé world. It explains why adult Europeans are often much more mature than American adults.
reply
share