3.7/10??? Oh, come on!
This movie wasn't that bad. I enjoyed it
the average rating should at least be a 5.1 (although I gave it an 8/10)
Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009:
1. Sorority Row
2. h2 (Halloween 2)
This movie wasn't that bad. I enjoyed it
the average rating should at least be a 5.1 (although I gave it an 8/10)
Most Anticipated Movies Of 2009:
1. Sorority Row
2. h2 (Halloween 2)
I enjoyed this enough 2 give it a 7, almost an 8. Awesome job by the killer. "Why are you doing this to us?" "Because you were home."
shareYou obviously have NO taste in movies what so ever!
shareI fully agree.
I gave it an 8.2/10 and think it's average rating should be anywhere from a 5.0-5.6, because I know it's an average film, I just happenned to love it. Well, it SHOULD be considered an average film, not a "1/10 rating" worthy film...
What is your dream? How far would you go? Who could you trust?
I'm as big a slasher movie fan as anyone, but I gave this a 2 out of 10 because that's what I felt it deserved. It just wasn't very good. At all.
Notice you didn't use the words terrible, horrible, crappy, awful, dreadful, etc etc in any way, yet you still gave it a 2 out of 10?!
I mean, come on. If I gave every movie a 2 out of 10 just because I didn't think it was "very good", I wouldn't have gave any movie above a 7.
What is your dream? How far would you go? Who could you trust?
I mean, to be perfectly honest...I don't really care what you think.
It's still a "2" in my book.
Thanks for stopping by.
I don't care if you care what I think, I am just making a statement.
It shouldn't be a 2 in anybody's book just because they didn't think it was very good. You can do whatever you want with your rating and opinions for this movie, it's not like I can make you say otherwise. I'm still pointing out that I think you're terribly wrong for the choice, and it's not like that's a crime now, is it?
What is your dream? How far would you go? Who could you trust?
Like I said, I don't care what you think. It is STILL a TWO, regradless if you agree with me or not. So just stop talking.
[deleted]
[deleted]
The problem is that this movie was marketed as a horror flick when in fact it is a formulaic crime thriller. Besides is not suspenseful, is not scary, is not even funny.
The cinematography is nice, perhaps "too" nice. I think horror movies should have a rougher look which IMO fits the genre better.
In short: A man who kills their victims with a cutter could be scary 50 years ago, but today it looks like a joke.
Next time we'll see a somebody using a fork or a pencil! c'mon!
i liked it ..... but then again i liked halloween resurrection and crossroads (the britney movie)
shareI thought this movie was terrible. I mean other than Idris Elba there to make up for the bad acting there wasn't a positive thing about it.
Jack- "Actually, I'm the oldest."
Eric- "Yeah but I've lived the longest."
3.7? OUCH It's now a 3.6
I don't think it should be that low. I think a 6 would be fine. Let me vote now.
If you think that this movie deserved a higher rating then I'm sorry...there's no hope for you.
"You will get precisely the news you deserve if you accept mediocrity."
Nick Clooney
It was extremely cliche and lacked anything memorable but it certainly doesn't deserve a paltry 3.6.4.5 at the least.
shareI gave it a 2/10. It was much too cliched and tried too hard to be scary.
___________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/UofLCardFan08
movie deserves at least a 5.1...
...Or at the very least the original deserves a 3.5 :P
No it doesn't to either sentence. PN 08 was godawful.
Doug Roberts: What do they call it when you kill people?
The Towering Inferno
[deleted]
No, it couldn't have because it was horribly written with HUGE gaps in logic, like the cops' behavior.
Doug Roberts: What do they call it when you kill people?
The Towering Inferno
if you're rating a horror movie based on the intelligent decisions of the characters/victims then no horror movie would be rated about a 2/10. That's a silly way to rate it - to me this movie is a 5/10 period- wasnt great but wasnt godawful either- it was okay- a decent pg-13 popcorn flick - was it filled with stupidity? of course- but was it at least entertaining as a corny pg13 slasher film? yes
shareI hate when I see comments like this, but if you think this is a good film and are not under 11...you ARE stupid.
shareI agree, although id use a harsher term than stupid. The people who like this movie are the kind of people I would never be friends with in real life. If I find out one of my friends liked this movie, we couldnt be friends again.
shareI feel the same way as you. Although no one I'm friends with would ever like this "film," I wouldn't actually drop a friend just for liking it...but to be honest with you, the thought would cross my mind and I'd be thinking about it from time to time.
share[deleted]
I gave it a six. There is not a movie in the world that should be graded 1/10 IMO. 1/10 is like the movie doesn't even exist.
share