MovieChat Forums > Crossing Over (2009) Discussion > Too much nudity.

Too much nudity.

posted 16 years ago by Motown82
91 replies | jump to latest

I'm not gay I just think that it wasn't necessary. I mean was it really important to see the Aussie womans' tits all the time. At first I'm like "ah yeah!" but then I realized I was getting more horny than informed.

I also think it was ironic that the middle eastern sister was brutally murdered for displaying her body in public by wearing low cut shirts, and then the actress being flat out naked on film. That being said it's like "Yeah we understand that the display of certain body parts are offensive to certain people in the world, and we're trying to be informative and sensitive at the same time. So let's bend this lady over on the bed and have her taking a cock from behind in this next shot" Good job guys I really think I get the point, it's a big *beep* you (literally) to their religion and beliefs. But, as a westerner I think she had a fantastic body, it was like living art. Thank You.

[–] hxrd-1337 16 years ago

The contrast is the point.

[–] ncrdrg 16 years ago

Pretty much.
I think both nudity scenes proved their point. This is trying to represent reality, not a fairy dream that parents would like their kids to believe.

For the aussie, I do think it was overplayed but I saw the point, it was to show how closed she was during sex. She was stark naked, had that other man playing with her and you could see how, in her face, she was in another world, how she was completely cold. And showing that kind of scene with the woman hiding under the sheets is completely illogical.

As for the killing scene, it was supposed to show how the killer went mad on the scene by catching in the act. What are they gonna do, catch them in the act having sex with their clothes on? Of course not, they were having sex together. Like they'd really put their clothes on when a guy with a gun enters you room.

I'm of the advice that a scenario shouldn't be modified to include sex scenes... but also that a scenario shouldn't be altered to remove these. And what you suggest is removing those to make it a sweet little fairy dream for children. This movie was not about children, it was quite clearly directed towards adults.
If you want to complain about nudity, aim your arrows at the blockbuster flicks which always have very clear sexual connotations for no reason other than showing off a hot girl to bring more viewers.

Finally, I watched that movie with my mom. I don't see why anyone would feel awkward watching this with their parents. It's not like I was saying "Wow man, look at those tits" during the sex scenes." We're both adults.

[–] maridgelyjr 15 years ago

This movie sucked ass. The nudity was the only reason it's worth watching. Disappointed Ashley didn't show off her sweet melons.

[–] kamen555 15 years ago

Ashley Judd is a B cup, not much to see. Alice Eve is a C cup, much nice to see. Perfect tits.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] kai70 15 years ago

there can never be too much nudity! for my liking!! However Its funny that nudity is the issue that rates a comment but senseless violence in a gun crazed culture doesn't rate a mention! get some perspective!

[–] ly_p31 15 years ago

I thought they should of shown what he made her do while on all four on the bed. He used her and degraded her. The crying in the shower really get the viewers to feel sad for her but would be even more emotional if see how she suffer just for stupid green card. so sad.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] ca01007 15 years ago

No complaints on the nudity here.

Let's get dangerous!