MovieChat Forums > The Blind Side (2009) Discussion > This (racist) movie annoyed Michael Oher

This (racist) movie annoyed Michael Oher


Michael Oher is really, really frosted that they made it look like Leigh Anne Tuohy had to show him how to play football.

Oher wrote this book to explain to kids that there is more to escaping a life of great poverty and need than waiting around to be adopted by rich people. He wrote it to recognize some of the other people besides the Tuohys (about whom he writes with tremendous love and devotion) who were so important to the changes in his life. He wrote it to offer advice to those who have heard the story and want to help kids who are in the foster care system.

But if I had to guess what put him over the top, and what made this naturally reticent guy decide to pull the trigger and work on a book about himself, I'd guess it was the scene in the film where Sandra Bullock, as Leigh Anne Tuohy, drags him around football practice explaining what blocking is. Oher devotes only a couple of paragraphs to his reaction to the film, but here's part of what he has to say:

I felt like it portrayed me as dumb instead of as a kid who had never had consistent academic instruction and ended up thriving once he got it. Quinton Aaron did a great job acting the part, but I could not figure out why the director chose to show me as someone who had to be taught the game of football. Whether it was S.J. moving around ketchup bottles or Leigh Anne explaining to me what blocking is about, I watched those scenes thinking, 'No, that's not me at all! I've been studying — really studying — the game since I was a kid!' That was my main hang-up with the film.

But ultimately, what's really interesting about the book isn't just the correcting of the record about his knowledge of football. It's in the title, in fact: I Beat The Odds. It's true, of course. Poverty, foster care, spotty school attendance, living in an unsafe environment with a frequently absent mother — there are a lot of reasons why, statistically speaking, the odds were not with young Michael.

What the story underscores as he tells it is just how many things have to happen for those odds to be overcome. Of course, it begins with Oher himself, and an impressive determination not to repeat his mother's life. (Interestingly, he says he believed from a young age that sports would be his exit strategy, though he originally thought it would be basketball.)

But think about it: Here's a guy who had a certain number of built-in tools to work with. He's intelligent, he's determined, he stayed largely (if not totally) out of trouble, and — oh, right — he has a level of innate athletic ability, as well as a physical build, that has allowed him to become a professional football player.

And yet.

And yet, when you read his story, what resonates is how many other people had to get involved in order for him to get as far as college at Ole Miss (putting aside the great fame and fortune of the NFL). Let's start tallying.

He had friends who were as determined as he was to get out. He had brothers and sisters who helped keep him alive. He had a social worker who, he now understands, was making tenacious efforts to keep track of him as he was making equally tenacious efforts to evade her. He had foster families which, while very uneven, included some placements where he was exposed to discipline and routine and was made to go to school.

Later, he zeroed in on the Hendersons, a friend's family already living outside the projects that had achieved some of what he wanted for himself, and he stuck close. That's the family that brought him to Briarcrest, the private school where he met the Tuohys. Then Briarcrest accepted him, a variety of school families took him in for a few nights here and there, the Tuohys took him in permanently, he got a private tutor who was utterly devoted to him, he took correspondence courses to bring his grades up ...

This is the picture he's trying to paint in this book. What happened in his life is instructive not because the process was magical like it looks in the movie, but because it's so enormously daunting. This is what was required — this level of heavy lifting by everyone, starting with Oher, and the additional advantages afforded by the Tuohys' willingness to share some of their considerable wealth — this is what it took to turn things around for a guy who started out as an amazing natural athlete with rare gifts and a passionate desire to change his life.


http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2011/02/08/133590180/beyond-the-bli nd-side-michael-oher-rewrites-his-own-story

reply

I just saw the movie last night.

I didn't see that scene as her trying to teach him the technical side of how to play football. That's what his coach was for. Instead, it was her trying to get him to put his heart into the game, to use his strong "Protective instinct" on the field the same way he did with her family. It was like the same way her husband got him to take an interest in literature. His tutor (Kathy Bates) kept suggesting stuff like Dickens or Jane Austen, but he couldn't relate. But when Sean described the poem "The Charge of the Light Brigate" and started explaining it in terms of sports and courage and character, suddenly he could relate and that inspired him to write an essay that got his grades up enough to get a college scholarship.

reply

[deleted]

LOL All that vitriol. Funny how often bigotry is borne of hatred.

reply

Nothing there about Oher saying the film is racist. He just didn't like all of the choices they made as they adapted the story for the film.

Of course, having him be a natural athlete who was already good at football would have made the major plot element about the investigation less sympathetic to Oher and the family, and thus weakened the film.

reply

I could see why Michael Oher would view this film as making him look stupid.
It's a good performance by Quinton Aaron, but not a greatly flattering portrayal.

reply

Here's a recent interview with Oher about the film,and how he feels that it's hurt him in some ways:


http://blogs.indiewire.com/shadowandact/michael-oher-says-the-blind-side-has-ruined-his-football-career-20150618

reply

I just watched this movie for the first time and found it funny, heartwarming, and inspirational. But I couldn't wait to get on IMDB because I somehow knew some poster would say the movie was racist. Some people can find racism in anything. It is laughable and sad at the same time. Get over yourself, not everything is racism.

reply

I just watched this movie for the first time and found it funny, heartwarming, and inspirational. But I couldn't wait to get on IMDB because I somehow knew some poster would say the movie was racist. Some people can find racism in anything. It is laughable and sad at the same time. Get over yourself, not everything is racism.

I agree chrisstout. There is a large portion of the population that thinks everything is racism. But I believe there is a larger portion of the population that feels the way you do. In my experience, you are part of the majority.


reply

It didn't annoy Michael Oher when it came out. It only annoyed him a few years later when his skills declined to the point he was no longer as effective as someone else on the football field.

reply

Sure thats why he goes from a 5 year contract getting 14 million in 2009 to a 4 year contract in 2014 getting 20 million thats really a major step back....

reply

I remember listening to a podcast review of the movie and while the reviewers liked the movie they said one of the things that bothered them was how they made Michael Oher seem like he had little mental faculty. They said they see a lot more light and intelligence behind his eyes in real life than was portrayed in the movie.

reply

This is a movie based on a true story. It is not a documentary of the exact story. It was never supposed to be.

reply

I read your post, Ebonie123, and wonder - I'm not sure if you are quoting from some other source or whether you are expressing your own thoughts - I wonder just how long amateur film critics here actually want their films to be.

A film is an abbreviated snapshot of lots of things typically using some licence aimed at getting paying customers through the door, not an academic treatise, encyclopedic work or anthropological study.

Incidentally - you can shove your description "This (racist) movie ..." - a tedious made up excuse for a whole class of people to sit around doing nothing but whinge and to demand money from people who have determination, industry and love for a happy, satisfying life.

reply